BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine is a safe, effective and underutilized treatment for opioid dependence that requires special credentialing, known as a waiver, to prescribe in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To describe buprenorphine clinical practices and barriers among office-based physicians. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred thirty-five office-based physicians waivered to prescribe buprenorphine in Massachusetts. MEASUREMENTS: Questionnaires mailed to all waivered physicians in Massachusetts in October and November 2005 included questions on medical specialty, practice setting, clinical practices, and barriers to prescribing. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with prescribing. RESULTS: Prescribers were 66% of respondents and prescribed to a median of ten patients. Clinical practices included mandatory counseling (79%), drug screening (82%), observed induction (57%), linkage to methadone maintenance (40%), and storing buprenorphine notes separate from other medical records (33%). Most non-prescribers (54%) reported they would prescribe if barriers were reduced. Being a primary care physician compared to a psychiatrist (AOR: 3.02; 95% CI: 1.48-6.18) and solo practice only compared to group practice (AOR: 3.01; 95% CI: 1.23-7.35) were associated with prescribing, while reporting low patient demand (AOR: 0.043, 95% CI: 0.009-0.21) and insufficient institutional support (AOR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.15-0.89) were associated with not prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: Capacity for increased buprenorphine prescribing exists among physicians who have already obtained a waiver to prescribe. Increased efforts to link waivered physicians with opioid-dependent patients and initiatives to improve institutional support may mitigate barriers to buprenorphine treatment. Several guideline-driven practices have been widely adopted, such as adjunctive counseling and monitoring patients with drug screening.
BACKGROUND:Buprenorphine is a safe, effective and underutilized treatment for opioid dependence that requires special credentialing, known as a waiver, to prescribe in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To describe buprenorphine clinical practices and barriers among office-based physicians. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred thirty-five office-based physicians waivered to prescribe buprenorphine in Massachusetts. MEASUREMENTS: Questionnaires mailed to all waivered physicians in Massachusetts in October and November 2005 included questions on medical specialty, practice setting, clinical practices, and barriers to prescribing. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with prescribing. RESULTS: Prescribers were 66% of respondents and prescribed to a median of ten patients. Clinical practices included mandatory counseling (79%), drug screening (82%), observed induction (57%), linkage to methadone maintenance (40%), and storing buprenorphine notes separate from other medical records (33%). Most non-prescribers (54%) reported they would prescribe if barriers were reduced. Being a primary care physician compared to a psychiatrist (AOR: 3.02; 95% CI: 1.48-6.18) and solo practice only compared to group practice (AOR: 3.01; 95% CI: 1.23-7.35) were associated with prescribing, while reporting low patient demand (AOR: 0.043, 95% CI: 0.009-0.21) and insufficient institutional support (AOR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.15-0.89) were associated with not prescribing. CONCLUSIONS: Capacity for increased buprenorphine prescribing exists among physicians who have already obtained a waiver to prescribe. Increased efforts to link waivered physicians with opioid-dependent patients and initiatives to improve institutional support may mitigate barriers to buprenorphine treatment. Several guideline-driven practices have been widely adopted, such as adjunctive counseling and monitoring patients with drug screening.
Authors: Joyce C West; Thomas R Kosten; Joshua Wilk; Dace Svikis; Elise Triffleman; Donald S Rae; William E Narrow; Farifteh F Duffy; Darrel A Regier Journal: Am J Addict Date: 2004
Authors: P G O'Connor; K M Carroll; J M Shi; R S Schottenfeld; T R Kosten; B J Rounsaville Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1997-10-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: W Ling; C Charuvastra; J F Collins; S Batki; L S Brown; P Kintaudi; D R Wesson; L McNicholas; D J Tusel; U Malkerneker; J A Renner; E Santos; P Casadonte; C Fye; S Stine; R I Wang; D Segal Journal: Addiction Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Chinazo O Cunningham; Hillary V Kunins; Robert J Roose; Rashiah T Elam; Nancy L Sohler Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-07-10 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Adam J Gordon; Hillary V Kunins; Darius A Rastegar; Jeanette M Tetrault; Alexander Y Walley Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-08-10 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Erin L Winstanley; Laura R Lander; James H Berry; James J Mahoney; Wanhong Zheng; Jeremy Herschler; Patrick Marshalek; Sheena Sayres; Jay Mason; Marc W Haut Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2019-05-08
Authors: Benjamin R Nordstrom; Elizabeth C Saunders; Bethany McLeman; Andrea Meier; Haiyi Xie; Chantal Lambert-Harris; Beth Tanzman; John Brooklyn; Gregory King; Nels Kloster; Clifton Frederick Lord; William Roberts; Mark P McGovern Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2016 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.702