Literature DB >> 21838837

Improving temporal efficiency of outpatient buprenorphine induction.

Erik W Gunderson1, Frances R Levin, Margaret M Rombone, Suzanne K Vosburg, Herbert D Kleber.   

Abstract

Buprenorphine induction poses a barrier for physician adoption of office-based opioid dependence treatment. We conducted a retrospective chart review of the first 41 patients inducted at a newly established outpatient treatment program to examine the induction process and determine strategies associated with greater induction efficiency. Timed withdrawal scales, medication log, and notes enabled reconstruction of the initial day of buprenorphine treatment. To assess change with experience, consecutive patients were divided into three chronological groups for analyses (Phases 1-3). The time required for induction was substantial in Phase 1 (mean 5.5 hours), but temporal efficiency improved to a mean 1.5 hours spent at the program by Phase 3 (p < .001). Phase 2-3 patients arrived to the program after significantly longer opioid abstinence and were in greater withdrawal, with mean Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale scores of 6, 10, and 10 for Phases 1-3, respectively (p < .01). Patients in the later phases had less time delay to medication initiation, 5 minutes in Phase 3 compared to 133 minutes in Phase 1 (p < .001). The mean 7-mg buprenorphine dose administered in the office did not differ between groups, but occurred over a smaller time interval for later phases indicating more rapid titration. Patients in the later phases had more rapid withdrawal relief after buprenorphine initiation and were more likely to have used preinduction ancillary withdrawal medication. The study sheds light on the induction barrier and provides practical procedural information to inform clinical guidelines and hopefully mitigate procedural aspects of the induction barrier. © American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21838837      PMCID: PMC3156625          DOI: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00153.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Addict        ISSN: 1055-0496


  26 in total

1.  Screening and intervention for illicit drug abuse: a national survey of primary care physicians and psychiatrists.

Authors:  P D Friedmann; D McCullough; R Saitz
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-01-22

2.  Using buprenorphine to facilitate entry into residential therapeutic community rehabilitation.

Authors:  Eric D Collins; Terry Horton; Katherine Reinke; Leslie Amass; Edward V Nunes
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2006-11-21

3.  Buprenorphine and midazolam act in combination to depress respiration in rats.

Authors:  Papa N Gueye; Stephen W Borron; Patricia Risède; Claire Monier; Françoise Buneaux; Marcel Debray; Frédéric J Baud
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  A comparison of levomethadyl acetate, buprenorphine, and methadone for opioid dependence.

Authors:  R E Johnson; M A Chutuape; E C Strain; S L Walsh; M L Stitzer; G E Bigelow
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-02       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Treating opioid addiction with buprenorphine-naloxone in community-based primary care settings.

Authors:  Ira L Mintzer; Mark Eisenberg; Maria Terra; Casey MacVane; David U Himmelstein; Steffie Woolhandler
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 6.  Buprenorphine: how to use it right.

Authors:  Rolley E Johnson; Eric C Strain; Leslie Amass
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Retention rate and substance use in methadone and buprenorphine maintenance therapy and predictors of outcome: results from a randomized study.

Authors:  Michael Soyka; Christina Zingg; Gabriele Koller; Heinrich Kuefner
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 5.176

8.  The Physician Clinical Support System-Buprenorphine (PCSS-B): a novel project to expand/improve buprenorphine treatment.

Authors:  James E Egan; Paul Casadonte; Tracy Gartenmann; Judith Martin; Elinore F McCance-Katz; Julie Netherland; John A Renner; Linda Weiss; Andrew J Saxon; David A Fiellin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Pharmacogenetic treatments for drug addiction: alcohol and opiates.

Authors:  Colin N Haile; Therese A Kosten; Thomas R Kosten
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.829

10.  Unobserved versus observed office buprenorphine/naloxone induction: a pilot randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Erik W Gunderson; Xin-Qun Wang; David A Fiellin; Benjamin Bryan; Frances R Levin
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.913

View more
  4 in total

1.  Treatment outcomes in opioid dependent patients with different buprenorphine/naloxone induction dosing patterns and trajectories.

Authors:  Petra Jacobs; Alfonso Ang; Maureen P Hillhouse; Andrew J Saxon; Suzanne Nielsen; Paul G Wakim; Barbara E Mai; Larissa J Mooney; Jennifer S Potter; Jack D Blaine
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2015-09-24

Review 2.  The dynamic interaction between pain and opioid misuse.

Authors:  Adrianne R Wilson-Poe; Jose A Morón
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Treatment of opioid dependence with buprenorphine: current update.

Authors:  Michael Soyka
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.986

Review 4.  Utilizing buprenorphine-naloxone to treat illicit and prescription-opioid dependence.

Authors:  Sofie Mauger; Ronald Fraser; Kathryn Gill
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 2.570

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.