Lance R McMahon1. 1. Department of Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA. mcmahonl@uthscsa.edu
Abstract
RATIONALE: Anandamide and Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) sometimes produce different discriminative stimulus effects and, therefore, appear to differ in their mechanism of action. In order to understand the widespread use of cannabis and the therapeutic potential of cannabinoids, mechanisms responsible for behavioral effects need to be identified. OBJECTIVE: Drug discrimination was used to compare the mechanism of action of Delta(9)-THC, anandamide, and two structural analogs of anandamide in rhesus monkeys. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Monkeys discriminated Delta(9)-THC (0.1 mg/kg i.v.) from vehicle. Delta(9)-THC, anandamide, methanandamide, and arachidonylcyclopropylamide (ACPA) were administered i.v. alone and in combination with at least one dose of rimonabant. Schild analysis and single-dose apparent affinity estimates were used to estimate the potency of rimonabant as an antagonist of each cannabinoid; these values were compared to examine whether the same receptors mediated discriminative stimulus effects. RESULTS: Delta(9)-THC, ACPA, methanandamide, and anandamide produced greater than 96% of responses on the Delta(9)-THC lever. The ED(50) values were 0.024 mg/kg for Delta(9)-THC, 0.14 mg/kg for ACPA, 0.28 mg/kg for methanandamide, and 1.7 mg/kg for anandamide. The duration of action of Delta(9)-THC was 4-6 h and longer than the duration of action ACPA, methanandamide, and anandamide (i.e., each less than 50 min). Rimonabant surmountably antagonized the discriminative stimulus effects of each agonist, and the apparent affinity estimates (pA (2) and pK (B) values) were 6.24-6.83. CONCLUSIONS: Rimonabant can produce surmountable antagonism of the behavioral effects of not only Delta(9)-THC but also anandamide, methanandamide, and ACPA, and the interactions appear simple, competitive, and reversible. These cannabinoid agonists act at the same receptors to produce discriminative stimulus effects.
RATIONALE: Anandamide and Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) sometimes produce different discriminative stimulus effects and, therefore, appear to differ in their mechanism of action. In order to understand the widespread use of cannabis and the therapeutic potential of cannabinoids, mechanisms responsible for behavioral effects need to be identified. OBJECTIVE: Drug discrimination was used to compare the mechanism of action of Delta(9)-THC, anandamide, and two structural analogs of anandamide in rhesus monkeys. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Monkeys discriminated Delta(9)-THC (0.1 mg/kg i.v.) from vehicle. Delta(9)-THC, anandamide, methanandamide, and arachidonylcyclopropylamide (ACPA) were administered i.v. alone and in combination with at least one dose of rimonabant. Schild analysis and single-dose apparent affinity estimates were used to estimate the potency of rimonabant as an antagonist of each cannabinoid; these values were compared to examine whether the same receptors mediated discriminative stimulus effects. RESULTS:Delta(9)-THC, ACPA, methanandamide, and anandamide produced greater than 96% of responses on the Delta(9)-THC lever. The ED(50) values were 0.024 mg/kg for Delta(9)-THC, 0.14 mg/kg for ACPA, 0.28 mg/kg for methanandamide, and 1.7 mg/kg for anandamide. The duration of action of Delta(9)-THC was 4-6 h and longer than the duration of action ACPA, methanandamide, and anandamide (i.e., each less than 50 min). Rimonabant surmountably antagonized the discriminative stimulus effects of each agonist, and the apparent affinity estimates (pA (2) and pK (B) values) were 6.24-6.83. CONCLUSIONS:Rimonabant can produce surmountable antagonism of the behavioral effects of not only Delta(9)-THC but also anandamide, methanandamide, and ACPA, and the interactions appear simple, competitive, and reversible. These cannabinoid agonists act at the same receptors to produce discriminative stimulus effects.
Authors: A D Khanolkar; V Abadji; S Lin; W A Hill; G Taha; K Abouzid; Z Meng; P Fan; A Makriyannis Journal: J Med Chem Date: 1996-10-25 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Thomas F Gamage; Charlotte E Farquhar; Timothy W Lefever; Julie A Marusich; Richard C Kevin; Iain S McGregor; Jenny L Wiley; Brian F Thomas Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2018-03-16 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Thomas F Gamage; Daniel G Barrus; Richard C Kevin; David B Finlay; Timothy W Lefever; Purvi R Patel; Megan A Grabenauer; Michelle Glass; Iain S McGregor; Jenny L Wiley; Brian F Thomas Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2020-04-02 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Robert E Vann; Jonathan A Warner; Kristen Bushell; John W Huffman; Billy R Martin; Jenny L Wiley Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2009-05-23 Impact factor: 4.432