Literature DB >> 11498713

(R)-methanandamide and Delta 9-THC as discriminative stimuli in rats: tests with the cannabinoid antagonist SR-141716 and the endogenous ligand anandamide.

T U Järbe1, R J Lamb, S Lin, A Makriyannis.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: (R)-methanandamide (AM-356), a metabolically more stable chiral analog of the endocannabinoid ligand anandamide, was used as a representative of fatty acid ethanolamide CB1 receptor ligands to characterize the discriminative stimulus functions of anandamides.
METHODS: Rats discriminated between 10 mg/kg (R)-methanandamide and vehicle administered IP 15 min prior to session onset. Another group of rats was initially trained to discriminate between 3 mg/kg Delta9-THC and vehicle given IP 30 min prior to session onset; for anandamide testing, the animals were retrained with 1.8 and 5.6 mg/kg Delta9-THC. A two lever operant methodology (FR10) was used.
RESULTS: Delta9-THC was more potent than (R)-methanandamide at both 15 and 30 min post-injection, irrespective of the training drug used. Additional tests with 10 and 18 mg/kg (R)-methanandamide suggested that the effects were declining by 1 h. The cannabinoid antagonist SR 141716 (0.3 and 1 mg/kg) produced rightward shifts in the Delta9-THC dose-response curve for Delta9-THC-appropriate responding and for (R)-methanandamide-appropriate responding (surmountable antagonism). SR-141716 (0.3 and 1 mg/kg) antagonized the ability of (R)-methanandamide to occasion either Delta9-THC-appropriate responding or (R)-methanandamide-appropriate responding. This antagonism was surmountable only at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg SR-1421716 in the (R)-methanandamide-trained rats. SR-141716 did not antagonize the rate-decreasing effects of (R)-methanandamide in either the Delta9-THC or the (R)-methanandamide trained rats. Response suppression precluded testing doses higher than 30 mg/kg (R)-methanandamide. Tests with SR-141716 (1 and 10 mg/kg) alone resulted in <3% Delta9-THC-appropriate responding. With 10 mg/kg SR-141716, response rate was significantly lower as compared to the rate observed during a vehicle test. Tests with anandamide (10 and 18 mg/kg) resulted in 41% and 85% (R)-methanandamide-appropriate responding at a 3-min pre-treatment time, but in a maximum of 15% (R)-methanandamide-appropriate responding at a longer (15 min) pre-treatment time. In the Delta9-THC (1.8 and 5.6 mg/kg) trained rats, anandamide never produced more than about 20% Delta9-THC-appropriate responding.
CONCLUSION: The results add to a growing body of evidence indicating that there are both similarities and dissimilarities between classical cannabinoids such as THC and endogenous fatty acid ethanolamides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11498713     DOI: 10.1007/s002130100730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  44 in total

1.  Cannabinergic aminoalkylindoles, including AM678=JWH018 found in 'Spice', examined using drug (Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol) discrimination for rats.

Authors:  Torbjörn U C Järbe; Hongfen Deng; Subramanian K Vadivel; Alexandros Makriyannis
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Synthetic Cannabinoids: Pharmacology, Behavioral Effects, and Abuse Potential.

Authors:  Sherrica Tai; William E Fantegrossi
Journal:  Curr Addict Rep       Date:  2014-06-01

3.  Cannabinoid agonists differentially substitute for the discriminative stimulus effects of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Lance R McMahon; Brett C Ginsburg; R J Lamb
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  [Future medications for tobacco and cannabis dependence].

Authors:  Bernard Le Foll; Zuzana Justinova; Gianlugi Tanda; Steven R Goldberg
Journal:  Bull Acad Natl Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.144

5.  Differentiation between low- and high-efficacy CB1 receptor agonists using a drug discrimination protocol for rats.

Authors:  Torbjörn U C Järbe; Brian J LeMay; Aneetha Halikhedkar; JodiAnne Wood; Subramanian K Vadivel; Alexander Zvonok; Alexandros Makriyannis
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Distinct pharmacology and metabolism of K2 synthetic cannabinoids compared to Δ(9)-THC: mechanism underlying greater toxicity?

Authors:  William E Fantegrossi; Jeffery H Moran; Anna Radominska-Pandya; Paul L Prather
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 5.037

7.  Endocannabinoid contribution to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol discrimination in rodents.

Authors:  Jenny L Wiley; D Matthew Walentiny; M Jerry Wright; Patrick M Beardsley; James J Burston; Justin L Poklis; Aron H Lichtman; Robert E Vann
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.432

8.  Antagonism of discriminative stimulus effects of delta(9)-THC and (R)-methanandamide in rats.

Authors:  Torbjörn U C Järbe; Quian Liu; Alexandros Makriyannis
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Discriminative stimulus functions of methanandamide and delta(9)-THC in rats: tests with aminoalkylindoles (WIN55,212-2 and AM678) and ethanol.

Authors:  Torbjörn U C Järbe; Chen Li; Subramanian K Vadivel; Alexandros Makriyannis
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Effects of sibutramine and rimonabant in rats trained to discriminate between 22- and 2-h food deprivation.

Authors:  David C Jewett; Thomas W Hahn; Travis R Smith; Britta L Fiksdal; Jason M Wiebelhaus; Andrew R Dunbar; Catherine R Filtz; Noah L Novinska; Allen S Levine
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.