Literature DB >> 18592195

Protein subcellular localization prediction using artificial intelligence technology.

Rajesh Nair1, Burkhard Rost.   

Abstract

Proteins perform many important tasks in living organisms, such as catalysis of biochemical reactions, transport of nutrients, and recognition and transmission of signals. The plethora of aspects of the role of any particular protein is referred to as its "function." One aspect of protein function that has been the target of intensive research by computational biologists is its subcellular localization. Proteins must be localized in the same subcellular compartment to cooperate toward a common physiological function. Aberrant subcellular localization of proteins can result in several diseases, including kidney stones, cancer, and Alzheimer's disease. To date, sequence homology remains the most widely used method for inferring the function of a protein. However, the application of advanced artificial intelligence (AI)-based techniques in recent years has resulted in significant improvements in our ability to predict the subcellular localization of a protein. The prediction accuracy has risen steadily over the years, in large part due to the application of AI-based methods such as hidden Markov models (HMMs), neural networks (NNs), and support vector machines (SVMs), although the availability of larger experimental datasets has also played a role. Automatic methods that mine textual information from the biological literature and molecular biology databases have considerably sped up the process of annotation for proteins for which some information regarding function is available in the literature. State-of-the-art methods based on NNs and HMMs can predict the presence of N-terminal sorting signals extremely accurately. Ab initio methods that predict subcellular localization for any protein sequence using only the native amino acid sequence and features predicted from the native sequence have shown the most remarkable improvements. The prediction accuracy of these methods has increased by over 30% in the past decade. The accuracy of these methods is now on par with high-throughput methods for predicting localization, and they are beginning to play an important role in directing experimental research. In this chapter, we review some of the most important methods for the prediction of subcellular localization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18592195     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-59745-398-1_27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  12 in total

1.  Experimental and statistical post-validation of positive example EST sequences carrying peroxisome targeting signals type 1 (PTS1).

Authors:  Thomas Lingner; Amr R A Kataya; Sigrun Reumann
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2012-02-01

2.  Identification of novel plant peroxisomal targeting signals by a combination of machine learning methods and in vivo subcellular targeting analyses.

Authors:  Thomas Lingner; Amr R Kataya; Gerardo E Antonicelli; Aline Benichou; Kjersti Nilssen; Xiong-Yan Chen; Tanja Siemsen; Burkhard Morgenstern; Peter Meinicke; Sigrun Reumann
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 3.  Protein mislocalization: mechanisms, functions and clinical applications in cancer.

Authors:  Xiaohong Wang; Shulin Li
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-04-04

4.  ngLOC: software and web server for predicting protein subcellular localization in prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

Authors:  Brian R King; Suleyman Vural; Sanjit Pandey; Alex Barteau; Chittibabu Guda
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-07-10

5.  Network analysis of human protein location.

Authors:  Gaurav Kumar; Shoba Ranganathan
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Artificial neural network for the prediction of tyrosine-based sorting signal recognition by adaptor complexes.

Authors:  Debarati Mukherjee; Claudia B Hanna; R Claudio Aguilar
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2012-03-11

7.  Protein (multi-)location prediction: utilizing interdependencies via a generative model.

Authors:  Ramanuja Simha; Sebastian Briesemeister; Oliver Kohlbacher; Hagit Shatkay
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Non-canonical peroxisome targeting signals: identification of novel PTS1 tripeptides and characterization of enhancer elements by computational permutation analysis.

Authors:  Gopal Chowdhary; Amr Ra Kataya; Thomas Lingner; Sigrun Reumann
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 4.215

9.  Protein localization prediction using random walks on graphs.

Authors:  Xiaohua Xu; Lin Lu; Ping He; Ling Chen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  HybridGO-Loc: mining hybrid features on gene ontology for predicting subcellular localization of multi-location proteins.

Authors:  Shibiao Wan; Man-Wai Mak; Sun-Yuan Kung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.