Literature DB >> 18591987

Radiation dose reconstruction from L-band in vivo EPR spectroscopy of intact teeth: Comparison of methods.

E Demidenko1, B B Williams, A Sucheta, R Dong, H M Swartz.   

Abstract

In vivo EPR tooth dosimetry is a more challenging problem than in vitro EPR dosimetry because of several potential additional sources of variation associated with measurements that are made in the mouth of a living subject. For in vivo measurement a lower RF frequency is used and, unlike in the in vitro studies, the tooth cannot be processed to optimize the amount and configuration of the enamel that is measured. Additional factors involved with in vivo measurements include the reproducibility of positioning the resonator on the surface of the tooth in the mouth, irregular tooth geometry, and the possible influence of environmental noise. Consequently, in addition to using the theoretical and empirical models developed for analyzing data from measurements of teeth in vitro, other unconventional and more robust methods of dose reconstruction may be needed. The experimental parameter of interest is the peak-to-peak amplitude of the spectrum, which is correlated to the radiation dose through a calibration curve to derive the reconstructed dose. In this study we describe and compare the results from seven types of computations to measure the peak-to-peak amplitude for estimation of the radiation induced signal. The data utilized were from three sets of in vivo measurements of irradiated teeth. Six different teeth with different doses were placed in the mouth of a volunteer in situ and measurements of each tooth were carried out on three different days. The standard error of dose prediction (SEP) is used as a figure of merit for quantifying precision of the reconstruction. We found that many of the methods gave fairly similar results, with the best error of prediction resulting from a computation based on a Lorentzian line model whose center field corresponds to the known parameter of the radiation-induced EPR spectra of teeth, with corrections from a standard sample that was measured as part of the data acquisition scheme. When the results from the three days of measurement were pooled, the SEP decreased dramatically, which suggests that one of the principal sources of variation in the data is the ability to precisely standardize the measurements conditions within the mouth. There are very plausible ways to accomplish improvements in the existing procedures.

Year:  2007        PMID: 18591987      PMCID: PMC2083575          DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Meas        ISSN: 1350-4487            Impact factor:   1.898


  5 in total

1.  Electron spin resonance dosimetry of teeth of Goiânia radiation accident victims.

Authors:  A M Rossi; C C Wafcheck; E F de Jesus; F Pelegrini
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Linewidth analysis of spin labels in liquids. I. Theory and data analysis.

Authors:  B H Robinson; C Mailer; A W Reese
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 3.  In vivo EPR dosimetry to quantify exposures to clinically significant doses of ionising radiation.

Authors:  Harold M Swartz; Akinori Iwasaki; Tadeusz Walczak; Eugene Demidenko; Ildar Salikhov; Nadeem Khan; Piotr Lesniewski; Jerry Thomas; Alex Romanyukha; David Schauer; Piotr Starewicz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Considerations regarding the implementation of EPR dosimetry for the population in the vicinity of Semipalatinsk nuclear test site based on experience from other radiation accidents.

Authors:  Valeriy Skvortsov; Alexander Ivannikov; Dimitri Tikunov; Valeriy Stepanenko; Natalie Borysheva; Sergey Orlenko; Mikhail Nalapko; Masaharu Hoshi
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  The Third International Intercomparison on EPR Tooth Dosimetry: part 2, final analysis.

Authors:  A Wieser; R Debuyst; P Fattibene; A Meghzifene; S Onori; S N Bayankin; A Brik; A Bugay; V Chumak; B Ciesielski; M Hoshi; H Imata; A Ivannikov; D Ivanov; M Junczewska; C Miyazawa; M Penkowski; S Pivovarov; A Romanyukha; L Romanyukha; D Schauer; O Scherbina; K Schultka; S Sholom; V Skvortsov; V Stepanenko; J A Thomas; E Tielewuhan; S Toyoda; F Trompier
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 0.972

  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  Experimental Procedures for Sensitive and Reproducible In Situ EPR Tooth Dosimetry.

Authors:  Benjamin B Williams; Artur Sucheta; Ruhong Dong; Yasuko Sakata; Akinori Iwasaki; Gregory Burke; Oleg Grinberg; Piotr Lesniewski; Maciej Kmiec; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.898

2.  In Vivo EPR For Dosimetry.

Authors:  Harold M Swartz; Greg Burke; M Coey; Eugene Demidenko; Ruhong Dong; Oleg Grinberg; James Hilton; Akinori Iwasaki; Piotr Lesniewski; Maciej Kmiec; Kai-Ming Lo; R Javier Nicolalde; Andres Ruuge; Yasuko Sakata; Artur Sucheta; Tadeusz Walczak; Benjamin B Williams; Chad Mitchell; Alex Romanyukha; David A Schauer
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.898

3.  A Deployable In Vivo EPR Tooth Dosimeter for Triage After a Radiation Event Involving Large Populations.

Authors:  Benjamin B Williams; Ruhong Dong; Ann Barry Flood; Oleg Grinberg; Maciej Kmiec; Piotr N Lesniewski; Thomas P Matthews; Roberto J Nicolalde; Tim Raynolds; Ildar K Salikhov; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 1.898

4.  Physically-based biodosimetry using in vivo EPR of teeth in patients undergoing total body irradiation.

Authors:  Benjamin B Williams; Ruhong Dong; Roberto J Nicolalde; Thomas P Matthews; David J Gladstone; Eugene Demidenko; Bassem I Zaki; Ildar K Salikhov; Piotr N Lesniewski; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 2.694

5.  Radiation dose prediction using data on time to emesis in the case of nuclear terrorism.

Authors:  Eugene Demidenko; Benjamin B Williams; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Standard error of inverse prediction for dose-response relationship: approximate and exact statistical inference.

Authors:  Eugene Demidenko; Benjamin B Williams; Ann Barry Flood; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Development of in vivo tooth EPR for individual radiation dose estimation and screening.

Authors:  Benjamin B Williams; Ruhong Dong; Maciej Kmiec; Greg Burke; Eugene Demidenko; David Gladstone; Roberto J Nicolalde; Artur Sucheta; Piotr Lesniewski; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy in radiation research: Current status and perspectives.

Authors:  Sudha Rana; Raman Chawla; Raj Kumar; Shefali Singh; Antoaneta Zheleva; Yanka Dimitrova; Veselina Gadjeva; Rajesh Arora; Sarwat Sultana; Rakesh Kumar Sharma
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2010-04

9.  Comparison study of tooth enamel ESR spectra of cows, goats and humans.

Authors:  Ling Jiao; Zhong-Chao Liu; Yan-Qiu Ding; Shu-Zhou Ruan; Quan Wu; Sai-Jun Fan; Wen-Yi Zhang
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.724

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.