Literature DB >> 16702247

The Third International Intercomparison on EPR Tooth Dosimetry: part 2, final analysis.

A Wieser1, R Debuyst, P Fattibene, A Meghzifene, S Onori, S N Bayankin, A Brik, A Bugay, V Chumak, B Ciesielski, M Hoshi, H Imata, A Ivannikov, D Ivanov, M Junczewska, C Miyazawa, M Penkowski, S Pivovarov, A Romanyukha, L Romanyukha, D Schauer, O Scherbina, K Schultka, S Sholom, V Skvortsov, V Stepanenko, J A Thomas, E Tielewuhan, S Toyoda, F Trompier.   

Abstract

The objective of the Third International Intercomparison on EPR Tooth Dosimetry was to evaluate laboratories performing tooth enamel dosimetry <300 mGy. Final analysis of results included a correlation analysis between features of laboratory dose reconstruction protocols and dosimetry performance. Applicability of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) tooth dosimetry at low dose was shown at two applied dose levels of 79 and 176 mGy. Most (9 of 12) laboratories reported the dose to be within 50 mGy of the delivered dose of 79 mGy, and 10 of 12 laboratories reported the dose to be within 100 mGy of the delivered dose of 176 mGy. At the high-dose tested (704 mGy) agreement within 25% of the delivered dose was found in 10 laboratories. Features of EPR dose reconstruction protocols that affect dosimetry performance were found to be magnetic field modulation amplitude in EPR spectrum recording, EPR signal model in spectrum deconvolution and duration of latency period for tooth enamel samples after preparation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16702247     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nci549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  5 in total

1.  Radiation dose reconstruction from L-band in vivo EPR spectroscopy of intact teeth: Comparison of methods.

Authors:  E Demidenko; B B Williams; A Sucheta; R Dong; H M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.898

2.  Q-band electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry in tooth enamel: biopsy procedure and determination of dose detection limit.

Authors:  Alex Romanyukha; François Trompier; Ricardo A Reyes
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  External dose reconstruction in tooth enamel of Techa riverside residents.

Authors:  E A Shishkina; A Yu Volchkova; Y S Timofeev; P Fattibene; A Wieser; D V Ivanov; V A Krivoschapov; V I Zalyapin; S Della Monaca; V De Coste; M O Degteva; L R Anspaugh
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Camel molar tooth enamel response to gamma rays using EPR spectroscopy.

Authors:  N A El-Faramawy; I El-Somany; A Mansour; A M Maghraby; H Eissa; A Wieser
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Electron spin resonance (ESR) dose measurement in bone of Hiroshima A-bomb victim.

Authors:  Angela Kinoshita; Oswaldo Baffa; Sérgio Mascarenhas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.