Literature DB >> 14524006

Results of an explorative empirical study on human mating in Germany: handsome men, not high-status men, succeed in courtship.

Alexander Pashos1, Carsten Niemitz.   

Abstract

Recent research on human mating depicts men as searching for physical attractiveness (PA) and women as searching for status. To identify the mechanisms which lead to universal, biologically interpretable structures in social processes, we focused on the proximate causes for inter- and intrasexual differences in human mating preferences, attraction, and tactics. We collected data on 180 young singles (mean age 26.9 years) without a steady relationship. A questionnaire and a video sequence (20-30 seconds) of each subject was taken. Next, each video sequence was rated by approximately 20 individuals of the opposite sex, who also participated in this study. Surprisingly, the answers given by male and female subjects regarding sociosexual behaviour and mating preferences are predominantly congruent. Sex differences among preferences for good looking and high-status partners were small or even insignificant. Lower educated subjects had considerably higher status preferences than higher educated individuals. In both sexes, PA was much more preferred in a potential partner than status. For both sexes, physical appearance was decisive for the subject's dating attractiveness. Male, but not female dating attractiveness also correlates with a kind and charismatic appearance. Furthermore, there was a positive linear relationship between men's PA and their number of sexual partners within the last year. Men with more than four sexual partners were all above-average in PA, while the most attractive women had a medium number of sexual partners. However, in this respect, status had no influence. The results show that sex differences in mating are more complex than hitherto assumed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14524006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anthropol Anz        ISSN: 0003-5548


  2 in total

1.  The contribution of the fusiform gyrus and superior temporal sulcus in processing facial attractiveness: neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  G Iaria; C J Fox; C T Waite; I Aharon; J J S Barton
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-06-08       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Brain responses to facial attractiveness induced by facial proportions: evidence from an fMRI study.

Authors:  Hui Shen; Desmond K P Chau; Jianpo Su; Ling-Li Zeng; Weixiong Jiang; Jufang He; Jintu Fan; Dewen Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.