Literature DB >> 1859070

Oral mucosal stimulation modulates intensity of breathlessness induced in normal subjects.

P M Simon1, R C Basner, S E Weinberger, V Fencl, J W Weiss, R M Schwartzstein.   

Abstract

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often report an increase in breathlessness when they breathe through a mouthpiece. We hypothesized that stimulation of receptors in the oral mucosa modulates the sensation of breathlessness. We studied 10 normal naive volunteers in whom breathlessness was induced by having them breathe for 4 min with an inspiratory resistive load (18 cm H2O/L/s) while breathing was stimulated by CO2 inhalation (end-tidal PCO2 maintained at 55 mm Hg). Initially, subjects breathed with a tight-fitting face mask and inspiratory flow was displayed on a storage oscilloscope. In subsequent trials, the subjects were asked to match this trace, which controlled ventilation and the pattern of breathing. Subjects performed eight trials, four with the tight-fitting mask only (M) and four with a mouthpiece and the mask (MM). M and MM were alternated; the initial condition was chosen at random. Following each of the trials, subjects rated the intensity of their breathlessness by choosing a number from a modified Borg scale. On the average, subjects were more breathless while breathing with the mask and mouthpiece than with the mask alone (mean ratings of breathlessness 6.6 +/- 1.1 and 5.6 +/- 1.8 units, p less than 0.01). Six subjects repeated the protocol on 2 additional days: 1 day with inhalation of warm (34 degrees C), humidified air and 1 day after topical application of 4% lidocaine to the oral mucosa. Both these interventions abolished the differences in breathlessness between mask and mouthpiece and mask alone. We conclude that afferent information from oral mucosal stimulation influences the intensity of breathlessness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1859070     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/144.2.419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis        ISSN: 0003-0805


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Acute dyspnoea].

Authors:  U Wagner; C Vogelmeier
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  Dyspnea: a sensory experience.

Authors:  R M Schwartzstein; H L Manning; J W Weiss; S E Weinberger
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.584

3.  Dyspnoea assessed by visual analogue scale in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease during progressive and high intensity exercise.

Authors:  A Noseda; J P Carpiaux; J Schmerber; J C Yernault
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  [Differential diagnoses of dyspnoea].

Authors:  A R Koczulla; C Vogelmeier
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  A mixed-methods pilot study of handheld fan for breathlessness in interstitial lung disease.

Authors:  Yet H Khor; Kirushallini Saravanan; Anne E Holland; Joanna Y T Lee; Christopher J Ryerson; Christine F McDonald; Nicole S L Goh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Impact of fan therapy during exercise on breathlessness and recovery time in patients with COPD: a pilot randomised controlled crossover trial.

Authors:  Alex Long; Martin Cartwright; Charles C Reilly
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2021-11-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.