Literature DB >> 18590333

Ligand-binding pocket shape differences between sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptors S1P1 and S1P3 determine efficiency of chemical probe identification by ultrahigh-throughput screening.

Stephan C Schürer1, Steven J Brown, Pedro J Gonzalez-Cabrera, Marie-Therese Schaeffer, Jacqueline Chapman, Euijung Jo, Peter Chase, Tim Spicer, Peter Hodder, Hugh Rosen.   

Abstract

We have studied the sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor system to better understand why certain molecular targets within a closely related family are much more tractable when identifying compelling chemical leads. Five medically important G-protein-coupled receptors for S1P regulate heart rate, coronary artery caliber, endothelial barrier integrity, and lymphocyte trafficking. Selective S1P receptor agonist probes would be of great utility to study receptor subtype-specific function. Through systematic screening of the same libraries, we identified novel selective agonist chemotypes for each of the S1P1 and S1P3 receptors. Ultrahigh-throughput screening (uHTS) for S1P1 was more effective than that for S1P3, with many selective, low nanomolar hits of proven mechanism emerging. Receptor structure modeling and ligand docking reveal differences between the receptor binding pockets, which are the basis for subtype selectivity. Novel selective agonists interact primarily in the hydrophobic pocket of the receptor in the absence of headgroup interactions. Chemistry-space and shape-based analysis of the screening libraries in combination with the binding models explain the observed differential hit rates and enhanced efficiency for lead discovery for S1P1 versus S1P3 in this closely related receptor family.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18590333      PMCID: PMC2597349          DOI: 10.1021/cb800051m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Chem Biol        ISSN: 1554-8929            Impact factor:   5.100


  29 in total

1.  Crystal structure of rhodopsin: A G protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  K Palczewski; T Kumasaka; T Hori; C A Behnke; H Motoshima; B A Fox; I Le Trong; D C Teller; T Okada; R E Stenkamp; M Yamamoto; M Miyano
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Alteration of lymphocyte trafficking by sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor agonists.

Authors:  Suzanne Mandala; Richard Hajdu; James Bergstrom; Elizabeth Quackenbush; Jenny Xie; James Milligan; Rosemary Thornton; Gan-Ju Shei; Deborah Card; CarolAnn Keohane; Mark Rosenbach; Jeffrey Hale; Christopher L Lynch; Kathleen Rupprecht; William Parsons; Hugh Rosen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-03-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The immune modulator FTY720 targets sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors.

Authors:  Volker Brinkmann; Michael D Davis; Christopher E Heise; Rainer Albert; Sylvain Cottens; Robert Hof; Christian Bruns; Eva Prieschl; Thomas Baumruker; Peter Hiestand; Carolyn A Foster; Markus Zollinger; Kevin R Lynch
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-04-19       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Reproducing the conformations of protein-bound ligands: a critical evaluation of several popular conformational searching tools.

Authors:  J Boström
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Molecular recognition in the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor family.

Authors:  Truc-Chi T Pham; James I Fells; Daniel A Osborne; E Jeffrey North; Mor M Naor; Abby L Parrill
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 2.518

Review 6.  Signaling and biological actions of sphingosine 1-phosphate.

Authors:  Timothy Hla
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.658

7.  Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor subtypes S1P1 and S1P3, respectively, regulate lymphocyte recirculation and heart rate.

Authors:  M Germana Sanna; Jiayu Liao; Euijung Jo; Christopher Alfonso; Min-Young Ahn; Melissa S Peterson; Bill Webb; Sophie Lefebvre; Jerold Chun; Nathanael Gray; Hugh Rosen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-01-19       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Sphingosine 1-phosphate pathway therapeutics: a lipid ligand-receptor paradigm.

Authors:  Hugh Rosen; Jiayu Liao
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Immune cell regulation and cardiovascular effects of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor agonists in rodents are mediated via distinct receptor subtypes.

Authors:  M Forrest; S-Y Sun; R Hajdu; J Bergstrom; D Card; G Doherty; J Hale; C Keohane; C Meyers; J Milligan; S Mills; N Nomura; H Rosen; M Rosenbach; G-J Shei; I I Singer; M Tian; S West; V White; J Xie; R L Proia; S Mandala
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2004-01-27       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Development of an intact cell reporter gene beta-lactamase assay for G protein-coupled receptors for high-throughput screening.

Authors:  Priya Kunapuli; Richard Ransom; Kathy L Murphy; Doug Pettibone; Julie Kerby; Sarah Grimwood; Paul Zuck; Peter Hodder; Raul Lacson; Ira Hoffman; James Inglese; Berta Strulovici
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 3.365

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacological tools for lysophospholipid GPCRs: development of agonists and antagonists for LPA and S1P receptors.

Authors:  Dong-Soon Im
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  S1P1 signaling just keeps going and going and going...

Authors:  Stuart Cahalan; Hugh Rosen
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 15.040

3.  A basis for reduced chemical library inhibition of firefly luciferase obtained from directed evolution.

Authors:  Douglas S Auld; Ya-Qin Zhang; Noel T Southall; Ganesha Rai; Marc Landsman; Jennifer MacLure; Daniel Langevin; Craig J Thomas; Christopher P Austin; James Inglese
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  A quantitative high-throughput screen for modulators of IL-6 signaling: a model for interrogating biological networks using chemical libraries.

Authors:  Ronald L Johnson; Ruili Huang; Ajit Jadhav; Noel Southall; Jennifer Wichterman; Ryan MacArthur; Menghang Xia; Kun Bi; John Printen; Christopher P Austin; James Inglese
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2009-06-19

5.  Novel selective allosteric and bitopic ligands for the S1P(3) receptor.

Authors:  Euijung Jo; Barun Bhhatarai; Emanuela Repetto; Miguel Guerrero; Sean Riley; Steven J Brown; Yasushi Kohno; Edward Roberts; Stephan C Schürer; Hugh Rosen
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 5.100

6.  Crystal structure of a lipid G protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  Michael A Hanson; Christopher B Roth; Euijung Jo; Mark T Griffith; Fiona L Scott; Greg Reinhart; Hans Desale; Bryan Clemons; Stuart M Cahalan; Stephan C Schuerer; M Germana Sanna; Gye Won Han; Peter Kuhn; Hugh Rosen; Raymond C Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Bitopic Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor 3 (S1P3) Antagonist Rescue from Complete Heart Block: Pharmacological and Genetic Evidence for Direct S1P3 Regulation of Mouse Cardiac Conduction.

Authors:  M Germana Sanna; Kevin P Vincent; Emanuela Repetto; Nhan Nguyen; Steven J Brown; Lusine Abgaryan; Sean W Riley; Nora B Leaf; Stuart M Cahalan; William B Kiosses; Yasushi Kohno; Joan Heller Brown; Andrew D McCulloch; Hugh Rosen; Pedro J Gonzalez-Cabrera
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 4.436

8.  Full pharmacological efficacy of a novel S1P1 agonist that does not require S1P-like headgroup interactions.

Authors:  Pedro J Gonzalez-Cabrera; Euijung Jo; M Germana Sanna; Steven Brown; Nora Leaf; David Marsolais; Marie-Therese Schaeffer; Jacqueline Chapman; Michael Cameron; Miguel Guerrero; Edward Roberts; Hugh Rosen
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 9.  Dissecting influenza virus pathogenesis uncovers a novel chemical approach to combat the infection.

Authors:  Michael B A Oldstone; John R Teijaro; Kevin B Walsh; Hugh Rosen
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.616

Review 10.  Innovation in academic chemical screening: filling the gaps in chemical biology.

Authors:  Samuel A Hasson; James Inglese
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.