Literature DB >> 18589061

Why are peer review outcomes less favorable for clinical science than for basic science grant applications?

Michael R Martin1, Teresa Lindquist, Theodore A Kotchen.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18589061      PMCID： PMC2517849          DOI： 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.03.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN： 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


× No keyword cloud information.
  17 in total

1.  The National Institutes of Health and clinical research: a progress report.

Authors:  D G Nathan; H E Varmus
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Careers in translational clinical research-historical perspectives, future challenges.

Authors:  David G Nathan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-05-08       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Educational-debt relief for clinical investigators--a vote of confidence.

Authors:  David G Nathan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Removing career obstacles for young physician-scientists -- loan-repayment programs.

Authors:  Timothy J Ley; Leon E Rosenberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Clinical research career development: the individual perspective.

Authors:  Myles Wolf
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Medicine. The NIH Roadmap.

Authors:  Elias Zerhouni
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research.

Authors:  Theodore A Kotchen; Teresa Lindquist; Karl Malik; Ellie Ehrenfeld
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Status of clinical research in academic health centers: views from the research leadership.

Authors:  E G Campbell; J S Weissman; E Moy; D Blumenthal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  New physician-investigators receiving National Institutes of Health research project grants: a historical perspective on the "endangered species".

Authors:  Howard B Dickler; Di Fang; Stephen J Heinig; Elizabeth Johnson; David Korn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise.

Authors:  Nancy S Sung; William F Crowley; Myron Genel; Patricia Salber; Lewis Sandy; Louis M Sherwood; Stephen B Johnson; Veronica Catanese; Hugh Tilson; Kenneth Getz; Elaine L Larson; David Scheinberg; E Albert Reece; Harold Slavkin; Adrian Dobs; Jack Grebb; Rick A Martinez; Allan Korn; David Rimoin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272
View more
  3 in total

1.  Factors Associated With Success of Clinician-Researchers Receiving Career Development Awards From the National Institutes of Health: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Kent A Griffith; Rochelle D Jones; Abigail Stewart; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  An analysis of preliminary and post-discussion priority scores for grant applications peer reviewed by the Center for Scientific Review at the NIH.

Authors:  Michael R Martin; Andrea Kopstein; Joy M Janice
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Peer review of health research funding proposals: A systematic map and systematic review of innovations for effectiveness and efficiency.

Authors:  Jonathan Shepherd; Geoff K Frampton; Karen Pickett; Jeremy C Wyatt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.