Literature DB >> 18588484

Coverage is the key for effective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis in Australia.

David G Regan1, David P Wilson, Jane S Hocking.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rate of diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis (chlamydia) infection has risen dramatically in Australia. In response, the Australian government is planning to implement systematic screening and testing. Several decisions must be made, including whom to screen.
METHODS: To inform decisions surrounding screening, a dynamic transmission model of the chlamydia epidemic was developed and parameterized with Australian sexual behavior and epidemiology data. A range of screening strategies and coverage rates were evaluated targeting various groups based on age and sex. Rigorous uncertainty and sensitivity analyses were undertaken.
RESULTS: The model predicts that even moderate screening coverage in young adults (<25 years old) will reduce prevalence rapidly. The absolute numbers of people screened, rather than the sex targeted, is the key determinant in reducing prevalence. Sensitivity analysis determined that chlamydia transmission is strongly related to 2 biological parameters (the proportion of infections that are asymptomatic in women and the duration of infection in men) and 2 behavioral parameters (the frequency of sex acts for 20-24-year-olds and the level of condom usage).
CONCLUSIONS: The model predicts that routine annual screening can significantly reduce the prevalence of chlamydia within 10 years, provided that adequate screening coverage is achieved. The most effective screening strategies will be those that target 20-24-year-olds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18588484     DOI: 10.1086/589883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  29 in total

1.  The role of reinfection and partner notification in the efficacy of Chlamydia screening programs.

Authors:  Janneke C M Heijne; Christian L Althaus; Sereina A Herzog; Mirjam Kretzschmar; Nicola Low
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Testing-adjusted chlamydia notification trends in New South Wales, Australia, 2000 to 2010.

Authors:  Michelle Cretikos; Darren Mayne; Roderick Reynolds; Paula Spokes; Daniel Madeddu
Journal:  Western Pac Surveill Response J       Date:  2014-08-14

3.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in the Lifetime Risk of Chlamydia trachomatis Diagnosis and Adverse Reproductive Health Outcomes Among Women in King County, Washington.

Authors:  Laura C Chambers; Christine M Khosropour; David A Katz; Julia C Dombrowski; Lisa E Manhart; Matthew R Golden
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Transmission of Chlamydia trachomatis through sexual partnerships: a comparison between three individual-based models and empirical data.

Authors:  Christian L Althaus; Katherine M E Turner; Boris V Schmid; Janneke C M Heijne; Mirjam Kretzschmar; Nicola Low
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Using Multiple Outcomes of Sexual Behavior to Provide Insights Into Chlamydia Transmission and the Effectiveness of Prevention Interventions in Adolescents.

Authors:  Eva Andrea Enns; Szu-Yu Kao; Katy Backes Kozhimannil; Judith Kahn; Jill Farris; Shalini L Kulasingam
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 6.  Screening for genital chlamydia infection.

Authors:  Nicola Low; Shelagh Redmond; Anneli Uusküla; Jan van Bergen; Helen Ward; Berit Andersen; Hannelore Götz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-13

7.  Incentive payments to general practitioners aimed at increasing opportunistic testing of young women for chlamydia: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jade E Bilardi; Christopher K Fairley; Meredith J Temple-Smith; Marie V Pirotta; Kathleen M McNamee; Siobhan Bourke; Lyle C Gurrin; Margaret Hellard; Lena A Sanci; Michelle J Wills; Jennifer Walker; Marcus Y Chen; Jane S Hocking
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Current crisis or artifact of surveillance: insights into rebound chlamydia rates from dynamic modelling.

Authors:  David M Vickers; Nathaniel D Osgood
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  The experience of providing young people attending general practice with an online risk assessment tool to assess their own sexual health risk.

Authors:  Jade E Bilardi; Lena A Sanci; Christopher K Fairley; Jane S Hocking; Danielle Mazza; Dot J Henning; Susan M Sawyer; Michelle J Wills; Debra A Wilson; Marcus Y Chen
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Population movement can sustain STI prevalence in remote Australian indigenous communities.

Authors:  Ben B Hui; Richard T Gray; David P Wilson; James S Ward; Anthony M A Smith; David J Philip; Matthew G Law; Jane S Hocking; David G Regan
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.