Eva Andrea Enns1, Szu-Yu Kao, Katy Backes Kozhimannil, Judith Kahn, Jill Farris, Shalini L Kulasingam. 1. From the *Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health; †J. Kahn and Associates, LLC; ‡Healthy Youth Development - Prevention Research Center, Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School; and §Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mathematical models are important tools for assessing prevention and management strategies for sexually transmitted infections. These models are usually developed for a single infection and require calibration to observed epidemiological trends in the infection of interest. Incorporating other outcomes of sexual behavior into the model, such as pregnancy, may better inform the calibration process. METHODS: We developed a mathematical model of chlamydia transmission and pregnancy in Minnesota adolescents aged 15 to 19 years. We calibrated the model to statewide rates of reported chlamydia cases alone (chlamydia calibration) and in combination with pregnancy rates (dual calibration). We evaluated the impact of calibrating to different outcomes of sexual behavior on estimated input parameter values, predicted epidemiological outcomes, and predicted impact of chlamydia prevention interventions. RESULTS: The two calibration scenarios produced different estimates of the probability of condom use, the probability of chlamydia transmission per sex act, the proportion of asymptomatic infections, and the screening rate among men. These differences resulted in the dual calibration scenario predicting lower prevalence and incidence of chlamydia compared with calibrating to chlamydia cases alone. When evaluating the impact of a 10% increase in condom use, the dual calibration scenario predicted fewer infections averted over 5 years compared with chlamydia calibration alone [111 (6.8%) vs 158 (8.5%)]. CONCLUSIONS: While pregnancy and chlamydia in adolescents are often considered separately, both are outcomes of unprotected sexual activity. Incorporating both as calibration targets in a model of chlamydia transmission resulted in different parameter estimates, potentially impacting the intervention effectiveness predicted by the model.
BACKGROUND: Mathematical models are important tools for assessing prevention and management strategies for sexually transmitted infections. These models are usually developed for a single infection and require calibration to observed epidemiological trends in the infection of interest. Incorporating other outcomes of sexual behavior into the model, such as pregnancy, may better inform the calibration process. METHODS: We developed a mathematical model of chlamydia transmission and pregnancy in Minnesota adolescents aged 15 to 19 years. We calibrated the model to statewide rates of reported chlamydia cases alone (chlamydia calibration) and in combination with pregnancy rates (dual calibration). We evaluated the impact of calibrating to different outcomes of sexual behavior on estimated input parameter values, predicted epidemiological outcomes, and predicted impact of chlamydia prevention interventions. RESULTS: The two calibration scenarios produced different estimates of the probability of condom use, the probability of chlamydia transmission per sex act, the proportion of asymptomatic infections, and the screening rate among men. These differences resulted in the dual calibration scenario predicting lower prevalence and incidence of chlamydia compared with calibrating to chlamydia cases alone. When evaluating the impact of a 10% increase in condom use, the dual calibration scenario predicted fewer infections averted over 5 years compared with chlamydia calibration alone [111 (6.8%) vs 158 (8.5%)]. CONCLUSIONS: While pregnancy and chlamydia in adolescents are often considered separately, both are outcomes of unprotected sexual activity. Incorporating both as calibration targets in a model of chlamydia transmission resulted in different parameter estimates, potentially impacting the intervention effectiveness predicted by the model.
Authors: Eline L Korenromp; Mondastri K Sudaryo; Sake J de Vlas; Ronald H Gray; Nelson K Sewankambo; David Serwadda; Maria J Wawer; J Dik F Habbema Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Lee Warner; Katherine M Stone; Maurizio Macaluso; James W Buehler; Harland D Austin Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: N Low; A McCarthy; J Macleod; C Salisbury; R Campbell; T E Roberts; P Horner; S Skidmore; J A C Sterne; E Sanford; F Ibrahim; A Holloway; R Patel; P M Barton; S M Robinson; N Mills; A Graham; A Herring; E O Caul; G Davey Smith; F D R Hobbs; J D C Ross; M Egger Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Katherine M E Turner; Elisabeth J Adams; Nigel Gay; Azra C Ghani; Catherine Mercer; W John Edmunds Journal: Theor Biol Med Model Date: 2006-01-20 Impact factor: 2.432
Authors: Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Amy B Knudsen; Jonathan Ozik; Nicholson Collier; Karen M Kuntz Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 4.755