| Literature DB >> 18587525 |
Holger Kessler1, Thomas A Bayer, Daniela Bach, Thomas Schneider-Axmann, Tillmann Supprian, Wolfgang Herrmann, Manfred Haber, Gerd Multhaup, Peter Falkai, Frank-Gerald Pajonk.
Abstract
Disturbed copper (Cu) homeostasis may be associated with the pathological processes in Alzheimer's disease (AD). In the present report, we evaluated the efficacy of oral Cu supplementation in the treatment of AD in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial in patients with mild AD for 12 months. Sixty-eight subjects were randomized. The treatment was well-tolerated. There were however no significant differences in primary outcome measures (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, Cognitive subscale, Mini Mental Status Examination) between the verum [Cu-(II)-orotate-dihydrate; 8 mg Cu daily] and the placebo group. Despite a number of findings supporting the hypothesis of environmental Cu modulating AD, our results demonstrate that oral Cu intake has neither a detrimental nor a promoting effect on the progression of AD.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18587525 PMCID: PMC2516533 DOI: 10.1007/s00702-008-0080-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) ISSN: 0300-9564 Impact factor: 3.575
Fig. 1Outline of flowchart of subjects studied. SAE serious adverse event
Demographic and clinical data at baseline of the patients that completed the study
| Sex (no. of males; no. of females) | Placebo ( | Verum ( |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 1 | 1.48 | 0.23 | |
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD |
|
|
| |
| Age (years) | 69.4 ± 8.1 | 69.6 ± 6.6 | 1, 55 | 0.01 | 0.94 |
| Disease duration (months) | 25.2 ± 16.2 | 34.0 ± 31.2 | 1, 54 | 1.76 | 0.19 |
| Age at onset (years) | 67.4 ± 7.9 | 66.6 ± 6.1 | 1, 54 | 0.17 | 0.68 |
| Education (years) | 10.6 ± 1.9 | 11.6 ± 2.9 | 1, 54 | 2.28 | 0.14 |
| CDT (scores) | 2.8 ± 1.3 | 2.8 ± 1.2 | 1, 55 | 0.01 | 0.93 |
n Number of cases, SD standard deviation, no. number, F F statistics, χ 2 χ 2 statistics, P error probability for falsely rejecting the null hypothesis, that there are no mean differences between the treatment groups
Fig. 2Mean and standard deviation change in cognitive abilities. a Cognitive abilities assessed with ADAS-cog in Cu (verum) vs. placebo arms. b Cognitive abilities assessed with MMSE score in Cu (verum) vs. placebo arms