BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The recent development of the UT ligand palosuran (1-[2-(4-benzyl-4-hydroxy-piperidin-1-yl)-ethyl]-3-(2-methyl-quinolin-4-yl)-urea sulphate salt) has led to the proposition that urotensin-II (U-II) plays a significant pathological role in acute and chronic renal injury in the rat. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In the present study, the pharmacological properties of palosuran were investigated further using a series of radioligand binding and functional bioassays. KEY RESULTS: Palosuran functioned as a 'primate-selective' UT ligand in recombinant cell membranes (monkey and human UT K(i) values of 4 +/- 1 and 5 +/- 1 nM), lacking appreciable affinity at other mammalian UT isoforms (rodent and feline K(i) values >1 microM). Paradoxically, however, palosuran lost significant (10- to 54-fold) affinity for native and recombinant human UT when radioligand binding was performed in intact cells (K(i) values of 50 +/- 3 and 276 +/- 67 nM). In accordance, palosuran also exhibited diminished activity in hUT (human urotensin-II receptor)-CHO (Chinese hamster ovary) cells (IC50 323 +/- 67 nM) and isolated arteries (K(b)>10 microM in rat aorta; K(b)>8.5 microM in cat arteries; K(b)>1.6 microM in monkey arteries; K(b) 2.2 +/- 0.6 microM in hUT transgenic mouse aorta). Relative to recombinant binding K(i) values, palosuran was subjected to a 392- to 690-fold reduction in functional activity in monkey isolated arteries. Such phenomena were peculiar to palosuran and were not apparent with an alternative chemotype, SB-657510 (2-bromo-N-[4-chloro-3-((R)-1-methyl-pyrrolidin-3-yloxy)-phenyl]-4,5-dimethoxybenzenesulphonamide HCl). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Collectively, such findings suggest that caution should be taken when interpreting data generated using palosuran. The loss of UT affinity/activity observed in intact cells and tissues cf. membranes offers a potential explanation for the disappointing clinical efficacy reported with palosuran in diabetic nephropathy patients. As such, the (patho)physiological significance of U-II in diabetic renal dysfunction remains uncertain.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The recent development of the UT ligand palosuran (1-[2-(4-benzyl-4-hydroxy-piperidin-1-yl)-ethyl]-3-(2-methyl-quinolin-4-yl)-urea sulphate salt) has led to the proposition that urotensin-II (U-II) plays a significant pathological role in acute and chronic renal injury in the rat. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In the present study, the pharmacological properties of palosuran were investigated further using a series of radioligand binding and functional bioassays. KEY RESULTS:Palosuran functioned as a 'primate-selective' UT ligand in recombinant cell membranes (monkey and human UT K(i) values of 4 +/- 1 and 5 +/- 1 nM), lacking appreciable affinity at other mammalian UT isoforms (rodent and feline K(i) values >1 microM). Paradoxically, however, palosuran lost significant (10- to 54-fold) affinity for native and recombinant human UT when radioligand binding was performed in intact cells (K(i) values of 50 +/- 3 and 276 +/- 67 nM). In accordance, palosuran also exhibited diminished activity in hUT (humanurotensin-II receptor)-CHO (Chinese hamster ovary) cells (IC50 323 +/- 67 nM) and isolated arteries (K(b)>10 microM in rat aorta; K(b)>8.5 microM in cat arteries; K(b)>1.6 microM in monkey arteries; K(b) 2.2 +/- 0.6 microM in hUT transgenic mouse aorta). Relative to recombinant binding K(i) values, palosuran was subjected to a 392- to 690-fold reduction in functional activity in monkey isolated arteries. Such phenomena were peculiar to palosuran and were not apparent with an alternative chemotype, SB-657510 (2-bromo-N-[4-chloro-3-((R)-1-methyl-pyrrolidin-3-yloxy)-phenyl]-4,5-dimethoxybenzenesulphonamide HCl). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Collectively, such findings suggest that caution should be taken when interpreting data generated using palosuran. The loss of UT affinity/activity observed in intact cells and tissues cf. membranes offers a potential explanation for the disappointing clinical efficacy reported with palosuran in diabetic nephropathypatients. As such, the (patho)physiological significance of U-II in diabetic renal dysfunction remains uncertain.
Authors: M Clozel; V Breu; K Burri; J M Cassal; W Fischli; G A Gray; G Hirth; B M Löffler; M Müller; W Neidhart Journal: Nature Date: 1993-10-21 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Matthias Heringlake; Thomas Kox; Orhan Uzun; Barbara Will; Ludger Bahlmann; Stephan Klaus; Sawas Eleftheriadis; Franz Paul Armbruster; Norbert Franz; Ernst Kraatz Journal: Regul Pept Date: 2004-09-15
Authors: Nambi Aiyar; Brian Guida; Zhaohui Ao; Jyoti Disa; Diane Naselsky; David J Behm; Jui-Lan Su; Frederick C Kull; Stephen A Douglas Journal: Peptides Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Stephen A Douglas; Diane Naselsky; Zhaohui Ao; Jyoti Disa; Christopher L Herold; Frank Lynch; Nambi V Aiyar Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2004-06-21 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Christopher S Breivogel; J Michael Walker; Susan M Huang; Mary Beth Roy; Steven R Childers Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: D J Behm; N V Aiyar; A R Olzinski; J J McAtee; M A Hilfiker; J W Dodson; S E Dowdell; G Z Wang; K B Goodman; C A Sehon; M R Harpel; R N Willette; M J Neeb; C A Leach; S A Douglas Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Alison Portnoy; Sanjay Kumar; David J Behm; Kelly M Mahar; Robert B Noble; John P Throup; Steven F Russ Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2013-04-29 Impact factor: 5.810