Literature DB >> 1858692

What are people really eating? The relation between energy intake derived from estimated diet records and intake determined to maintain body weight.

W Mertz1, J C Tsui, J T Judd, S Reiser, J Hallfrisch, E R Morris, P D Steele, E Lashley.   

Abstract

Two hundred sixty-six free-living human volunteers, 21-64 y old, were trained by dietitians to record daily their food intake for at least 7 d. Subsequently, they were fed diets of conventional foods adjusted in amounts to maintain their body weight for greater than or equal to 45 d. Comparing their estimated energy intake with the intake determined to maintain weight yielded mean differences of 2365 and 1792 kJ (565 and 428 kcal) in men and women, respectively, representing an underreporting of 18%. Twenty-two individuals (8%) overestimated and 29 (11%) were accurate to within 419 kJ (100 kcal) of their maintenance requirement. The remaining 215 individuals (81%) reported their habitual intake at 2930 +/- 1586 kJ (700 +/- 379 kcal) below that subsequently determined as their maintenance requirement. These findings suggest caution in the interpretation of food-consumption data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1858692     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/54.2.291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  42 in total

1.  Knowledge of calories and its effect on eating behavior in overweight, normal weight, and underweight individuals.

Authors:  B Mangweth; J I Hudson; H G Pope; S Oberleit; C De Col; J Kinzl; W Biebl
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 2.  Nutritional practices of male and female endurance cyclists.

Authors:  L M Burke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Clinical nutrition: 5. How much should Canadians eat?

Authors:  C Laird Birmingham; Peter J Jones
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Guidelines for daily carbohydrate intake: do athletes achieve them?

Authors:  L M Burke; G R Cox; N K Culmmings; B Desbrow
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  The control of food intake of free-living humans: putting the pieces back together.

Authors:  John M de Castro
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-05-05

6.  Brisk walking improves endurance fitness without changing body fatness in previously sedentary women.

Authors:  A E Hardman; P R Jones; N G Norgan; A Hudson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

Review 7.  Dietary trans fatty acids: review of recent human studies and food industry responses.

Authors:  J Edward Hunter
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.880

8.  Changes in self-efficacy and dietary adherence: the impact on weight loss in the PREFER study.

Authors:  Melanie T Warziski; Susan M Sereika; Mindi A Styn; Edvin Music; Lora E Burke
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2007-10-26

9.  Non-invasive monitoring of chewing and swallowing for objective quantification of ingestive behavior.

Authors:  Edward Sazonov; Stephanie Schuckers; Paulo Lopez-Meyer; Oleksandr Makeyev; Nadezhda Sazonova; Edward L Melanson; Michael Neuman
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.833

Review 10.  A rational approach to treating hypercholesterolaemia in children. Weighing the risks and benefits.

Authors:  S Tonstad
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.