TSG-6 is an inflammation-induced protein that is produced at pathological sites, including arthritic joints. In animal models of arthritis, TSG-6 protects against joint damage; this has been attributed to its inhibitory effects on neutrophil migration and plasmin activity. Here we investigated whether TSG-6 can directly influence bone erosion. Our data reveal that TSG-6 inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation/activation from human and murine precursor cells, where elevated dentine erosion by osteoclasts derived from TSG-6(-/-) mice is consistent with the very severe arthritis seen in these animals. However, the long bones from unchallenged TSG-6(-/-) mice were found to have higher trabecular mass than controls, suggesting that in the absence of inflammation TSG-6 has a role in bone homeostasis; we have detected expression of the TSG-6 protein in the bone marrow of unchallenged wild type mice. Furthermore, we have observed that TSG-6 can inhibit bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2)-mediated osteoblast differentiation. Interaction analysis revealed that TSG-6 binds directly to RANKL and to BMP-2 (as well as other osteogenic BMPs but not BMP-3) via composite surfaces involving its Link and CUB modules. Consistent with this, the full-length protein is required for maximal inhibition of osteoblast differentiation and osteoclast activation, although the isolated Link module retains significant activity in the latter case. We hypothesize that TSG-6 has dual roles in bone remodeling; one protective, where it inhibits RANKL-induced bone erosion in inflammatory diseases such as arthritis, and the other homeostatic, where its interactions with BMP-2 and RANKL help to balance mineralization by osteoblasts and bone resorption by osteoclasts.
TSG-6 is an inflammation-induced protein that is produced at pathological sites, including arthritic joints. In animal models of arthritis, TSG-6 protects against joint damage; this has been attributed to its inhibitory effects on neutrophil migration and plasmin activity. Here we investigated whether TSG-6 can directly influence bone erosion. Our data reveal that TSG-6 inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation/activation from human and murine precursor cells, where elevated dentine erosion by osteoclasts derived from TSG-6(-/-) mice is consistent with the very severe arthritis seen in these animals. However, the long bones from unchallenged TSG-6(-/-) mice were found to have higher trabecular mass than controls, suggesting that in the absence of inflammationTSG-6 has a role in bone homeostasis; we have detected expression of the TSG-6 protein in the bone marrow of unchallenged wild type mice. Furthermore, we have observed that TSG-6 can inhibit bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2)-mediated osteoblast differentiation. Interaction analysis revealed that TSG-6 binds directly to RANKL and to BMP-2 (as well as other osteogenic BMPs but not BMP-3) via composite surfaces involving its Link and CUB modules. Consistent with this, the full-length protein is required for maximal inhibition of osteoblast differentiation and osteoclast activation, although the isolated Link module retains significant activity in the latter case. We hypothesize that TSG-6 has dual roles in bone remodeling; one protective, where it inhibits RANKL-induced bone erosion in inflammatory diseases such as arthritis, and the other homeostatic, where its interactions with BMP-2 and RANKL help to balance mineralization by osteoblasts and bone resorption by osteoclasts.
TSG-6,4 the
∼35-kDa secreted product of TNF-stimulated gene-6
(1), is expressed in response
to various inflammatory mediators and growth factors
(2). It is comprised almost
entirely of contiguous Link and CUB modules and binds to a diversity of
protein and glycosaminoglycan ligands, including pentraxin-3,
thrombospondin-1, thrombospondin-2, aggrecan, versican,
inter-α-inhibitor, bikunin, bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2),
fibronectin, hyaluronan (HA), heparin, heparan sulfate, chondroitin 4-sulfate,
and dermatan sulfate (1,
3–16).
The three-dimensional structure of the Link module from humanTSG-6 (produced
in Escherichia coli and termed Link_TSG6
(17)) has been determined by
both NMR spectroscopy and x-ray crystallography
(13,
14,
18), where the ligand binding
sites for HA, bikunin, and heparin have been mapped onto this domain
(8,
19,
20). In addition, we have
recently expressed the CUB_C domain from humanTSG-6 (termed CUB_C_TSG6
(12)), which comprises the CUB
module and C-terminal region of the protein, and have used this material to
obtain an x-ray structure for the TSG-6CUB
module.5Current data suggest that TSG-6 is not constitutively expressed in normal
adult tissues, but rather that it is associated with inflammatory diseases
(2,
21,
22) such as asthma
(23) and arthritis
(24,
25). However, TSG-6 is
produced in ovulating ovarian follicles, where it has an essential
physiological role in female fertility
(26,
27). TSG-6 has been most
extensively studied in the context of articular joint disease; it has been
detected in the synovial fluid, cartilage, and synovia of osteoarthritis and
rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients but not in the corresponding normal tissues
(24,
25). It is likely that TSG-6
is produced locally at disease lesions in joints, as its expression can be
induced in cultured human chondrocytes by TNF, IL-1, IL-6, TGF-β, and
platelet-derived growth factor
(28,
29), and it is constitutively
expressed by synoviocytes from RA patients, where its production is further
enhanced by treatment with IL-1, TNF
(24), and IL-17
(30). A number of studies have
revealed that TSG-6 has a protective role in experimental models of arthritis
(31–35).
For example, in collagen-induced arthritis (an autoimmune polyarthritis with a
histopathology similar to human RA) there was delayed onset of symptoms and
reduction of both disease incidence and joint inflammation/destruction in
TSG-6transgenic mice or wild type mice treated systemically with recombinant
humanTSG-6 (31,
32), where the TSG-6 transgene
mediated an effect comparable with anti-TNF antibody treatment in mice
(32). In cartilage-specific
TSG-6transgenic mice, the instigation of antigen-induced arthritis (a model
of monoarticular arthritis) resulted in delayed cartilage damage compared with
controls, with reduced degradation of aggrecan by matrix metalloproteinases
and aggrecanases (34).
Furthermore, there was evidence of cartilage regeneration 4–5 weeks
after the onset of disease in these animals. Similar chondroprotective effects
were seen in wild type mice where recombinant murineTSG-6 was injected
directly into the affected joint in antigen-induced arthritis or intravenously
in proteoglycan-induced arthritis (a model of human RA)
(33). The anti-inflammatory
and chondroprotective effects of TSG-6 observed in these studies are likely to
be due to more than one mechanism
(22). For example, TSG-6 is a
potent inhibitor of neutrophil extravasation in vivo
(36–38)
and has also been implicated in the inhibition of the protease network through
its potentiation of the anti-plasmin activity of inter-α-inhibitor
(8,
36,
37), where plasmin is a key
regulator of proteolysis during inflammation, e.g. via its activation
of matrix metalloproteinases. In this regard, TSG-6-/-
mice develop an accelerated and much more severe form of proteoglycan-induced
arthritis than controls, having extensive cartilage degradation and bone
erosion, which was attributed to increased neutrophil infiltration and plasmin
activity in the inflamed paw joints
(35).The data presented here demonstrate that TSG-6 inhibits bone erosion by
osteoclasts and that this is likely to be mediated via a mechanism that
involves its direct interaction with RANKL (the receptor activator of
NF-κB ligand), the major regulator of osteoclast activity and of joint
destruction in arthritis. We have also shown that TSG-6 binds to osteogenic
bone morphogenetic proteins (i.e. BMP-2, -4, -5, -6, -7, -13, and
-14) and provide evidence that TSG-6 has a physiological role in bone
homeostasis via the regulation of both bone formation and resorption.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Preparation of Recombinant TSG-6 Proteins—Full-length
recombinant human (rh)TSG-6 was expressed in Drosophila S2 cells and
purified as described previously
(39). Link_TSG6 (the Link
module of humanTSG-6, corresponding to residues 36–133 of the
pre-protein (1)) and CUB_C_TSG6
(the CUB domain and C-terminal 27 amino acids; i.e. residues
129–277 of the human pre-protein) were expressed in E. coli,
purified, and characterized as described in Day et al.
(17), Kahmann et al.
(40), and in Kuznetsova et
al. (12),
respectively.Effect of TSG-6 on RANKL-induced Human Osteoclast
Formation—To determine the effects of TSG-6 on RANKL-induced human
osteoclast formation, human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were
isolated from healthy male volunteers (age range 25–35 years) as
described in Sabokbar and Athanasou
(41). Briefly, blood was
collected in EDTA-treated tubes and diluted 1:1 in α-minimum essential
medium (αMEM) (Invitrogen), layered over Histopaque (Sigma-Aldrich),
then centrifuged (693 × g), washed, and resuspended in
αMEM with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Invitrogen).
PBMCs were counted after lysis of red cells with 5% (v/v) acetic acid and
seeded (at 5 × 105 cells/well) into 96-well tissue culture
plates containing either dentine slices or coverslips. After 2 h of
incubation, dentine slices and coverslips were removed from the wells and
washed vigorously in αMEM to remove non-adherent cells before transfer
into 24-well tissue culture plates containing 1 ml/well αMEM
supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum, 10 mm l-glutamine,
antibiotics (100 IU/ml penicillin and 10 μg/ml streptomycin), 25 ng/ml
macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF; R&D Systems Europe), and 50
ng/ml soluble (s)RANKL (PeproTech). After the addition of rhTSG-6 (30.1 kDa
(39)) at 0–50 ng/ml or
equimolar concentrations of Link_TSG6 (10.9 kDa
(17)) or CUB_C_TSG6 (16.8 kDa
(12)), cultures were
maintained for up to 21 days, during which time the entire culture medium
containing all factors was replenished every 2–3 days.Osteoclast formation was assessed cytochemically by determining the number
of multinucleated tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-positive cells after 14
days in culture. Cells on coverslips were fixed in 10% (v/v) formalin and
stained using napthol AS-BI as a substrate in the presence of 1.0 m
acetate-tartrate; the reaction was stopped with 0.5 m NaF. Bone
resorptive activity, an indicator of osteoclast activation, was determined by
the measurement of resorption lacunae on dentine slices. After 21 days in
culture dentine slices were removed from the wells, rinsed in PBS, placed in
1.0 m NH4OH overnight, and then sonicated for 5–10
min; this resulted in complete removal of cells from the dentine slice,
permitting examination of its surface. The slices were washed in distilled
water, stained with 0.5% (w/v) aqueous toluidine blue, pH 5.0, and examined by
light microscopy. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining was analyzed
using ImageJ software
(rsb.info.nih.gov/ij),
whereas for lacunar resorption the data were expressed as the mean percentage
area resorbed from four dentine slices per treatment. Each set of experiments
was repeated at least three times.Extent of Osteoclast Formation in TSG-6-deficient
Mice—TSG-6-/- mice were generated as described
previously (27) and
back-crossed into the BALB/c background
(35). Age-matched pairs of
female TSG-6-/- and wild type (WT) BALB/c mice (between 18
and 25 weeks of age) were used for experiments. All procedures carried out on
animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Rush
University Medical Center, Chicago, IL). Bone marrow cells from the long bones
of TSG-6-/- mice were isolated as previously described
(42). Briefly, mice were
killed by CO2 inhalation, and the femora and tibiae were
aseptically removed and dissected free of adherent soft tissue. The bone ends
were cut, and the marrow cavity was flushed out into a Petri dish by slowly
injecting αMEM at one end of the bone using a sterile 21-gauge needle.
The bone marrow suspension was carefully agitated with a plastic Pasteur
pipette to obtain a homogeneous suspension of cells, and these were incubated
for 2 h at a density of 5 × 104 cells/ml in 96-well plates
containing dentine slices. Non-adherent cells were removed from the dentine
slices (by vigorous washing in αMEM), which were then transferred to
24-well plates containing αMEM with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated serum and
antibiotics (as described above). Cultures on dentine slices were maintained
in the presence of 25 ng/ml M-CSF (R&D Systems Europe) and 30 ng/ml murine
sRANKL (PeproTech) for 10 days during which the culture media and factors were
replenished every 2–3 days. The extent of lacunar resorption was then
determined as described above.Micro-computerized Tomography (CT) Analysis of Long Bones from
TSG-6-deficient and WT Mice—Micro-CT analysis of the long bones in
TSG-6-deficient and WT mouse femurs was performed to determine any differences
in trabecular bone; four pairs of age-matched male mice (24–28 weeks)
were analyzed. Briefly, plastic-wrapped knees were mounted vertically on a
Skyscan 1172 micro-CT scanner and scans (6.77 μm with a voxel resolution of
6.9 μm2) were performed using a 20–100-kV microfocus x-ray
source with a 10-megapixel digital x-ray camera. The images obtained were
subjected to three-dimensional angular resampling (using Skyscan 3D-creator
software), and morphometric parameters were calculated for trabecular regions
of interest using a Marching Cubes model
(43) as described previously
(44).Immunolocalization of TSG-6 in the Mouse Knee Joint—Mouse
knee joints were prepared for confocal immunohistochemistry essentially as
described in Plaas et al.
(45). Briefly, mouse legs were
fixed in 10% (v/v) neutral-buffered formalin for 48 h, skin and muscle tissue
were removed, and joints were decalcified in 5% (w/v) EDTA in PBS for 14 days.
Specimens were then processed and embedded in paraffin. Thin sections (4
μm) were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and exposed to a rabbit anti-TSG-6
polyclonal antibody (prepared in collaboration with Dr. J. D. Sandy (Rush
University, Chicago, IL) and Affinity Bioreagents (Golden, CO) against the
peptide ASVTAGGFQIK, affinity-purified, and shown to recognize recombinant
murineTSG-6 (R&D Systems) and rhTSG-6
(39) by Western blotting; see
supplemental Fig. 1) at 10 μg/ml (IgG) in 1.5% (v/v) goat serum in PBS for
30 min, washed in PBS for 5 min, and then incubated with AlexaFluor-568 goat
anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes; 1:250 in PBS) for 1 h at room temperature.
Sections were co-stained for HA using 5 μg/ml biotinylated bovinecartilage
HA-binding protein/link protein complexes (isolated in the A1A1D6 fraction
after CsCl gradient centrifugation) followed by AlexaFluor-488-streptavidin
(Molecular Probes) as described in Plaas et al.
(45). Nuclei were stained with
TOTO-3 (Molecular Probes; 1:500 in PBS), and sections were examined by
confocal microscopy as detailed previously
(45).Effect of TSG-6 on BMP-2-induced Osteoblast
Differentiation—Murine MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells (European
Collection of Cell Cultures)
(46) and MBA-15.4
pre-osteoblastic marrow-derived cells
(47) were seeded on 24-well
plates (1.25 × 104 cells/ml) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum
(Invitrogen), 10 mm l-glutamine, and antibiotics (100 IU/ml
penicillin and 10 μg/ml streptomycin). Differentiation into osteoblasts was
induced with 100 ng/ml BMP-2 (R&D Systems Europe), and the effects of
adding rhTSG-6 (0–10000 ng/ml) or molar equivalents of Link_TSG6 or
CUB_C_TSG6 proteins were determined. Cells were cultured for 7 days in a
humidified atmosphere with 5% (v/v) CO2 at 37 °C, during which
time the culture media (including all factors) was replaced every 72 h. Cells
were washed in PBS and freeze-thawed 3 times, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP)
was released by scraping cells into 50 μl of 0.2% (v/v) Nonidet P-40
(Fluka) and subsequent sonication (5 s at 6 watts). ALP activity (pmol/μl
of material) was determined using the fluorescent substrate 4-methyl
umbelliferyl phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich). Briefly, 10 μl of cell lysate was
diluted in 50 μl of 0.16% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 10 mm Tris, pH
8.0, in the wells of a Nunclon Delta (Nunc) plate, and 100 μl of 0.2
mm methyl umbelliferyl phosphate was added. Plates were incubated
at 37 °C for 45 min, and the reaction was stopped by adding 100 μl of
0.6 m Na2CO3 to each well. Fluorescence was
measured using an excitation wavelength of 360 nm and an emission wavelength
of 450 nm (with a 435 nm cutoff) on a SPECTRAmax GEMINI microplate
spectrofluorometer. The yield of ALP was calculated by the preparation of a
standard curve of 0–1000 pmol of 4-methyl umbelliferyl phosphate (Sigma)
on the same plate and standardized against the total amount of protein/well
(in μg), determined using a BCA protein assay kit (Pierce).TSG-6 Binding ELISA—The BMP and sRANKL binding activities of
TSG-6 and its individual domains were determined colorimetrically using
ELISAs. All dilutions, incubations, and washes were performed in standard
assay buffer (SAB; PBS containing 0.2% (v/v) Tween 20) and at room temperature
unless otherwise indicated. BMPs (-2, -13, and -14 from PeproTech; -3, -4, -5,
-6, and -7 from R&D Systems Europe) or sRANKL (PeproTech) were coated
overnight on Polysorp (Nunc) microtiter plates (0–30 pmol/well) in PBS
at room temperature. After this and all subsequent steps, wells were washed
three times with SAB. All wells were blocked for 90 min at 37 °C in SAB
containing 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin and then incubated for 4 h with
rhTSG-6, Link_TSG6, or CUB_C_TSG6 at 2 or 5 pmol/well for the BMP and sRANKL
assays, respectively. Bound TSG-6 and CUB_C_TSG6 were compared by incubation
for 45 min with a rabbit polyclonal antiserum (RAH-1)
(48) diluted 1:4000 followed
by incubation with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG
(1:2000; Sigma-Aldrich) for an additional 45 min. Bound Link_TSG6 and TSG-6
were compared using the monoclonal antibody Q75
(49) at 1.25 μg/ml followed
by alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG (1:2000; Sigma-Aldrich),
where these were incubated for 45 min each. Disodium p-nitrophenyl
phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich) at 1 mg/ml in 0.05 m Tris-HCl, 0.1
m NaCl, 5 mm MgCl2·6H2O, pH
9.3, was added, and absorbance values at 405 nm were measured after 30 or 60
min of incubation (for BMP and sRANKL ELISAs, respectively) and corrected
against control wells (i.e. those containing no immobilized
protein).sRANKL Binding ELISA—TSG-6 or its individual protein domains
(0–30 pmol/well) were coated overnight onto microtiter plates, blocked,
and washed as described above. All wells were incubated with 30 ng/well
biotinylated-sRANKL (PeproTech) for 4 h, and bound sRANKL was detected with
ExtrAvidin alkaline phosphatase (Sigma-Aldrich) as described in Mahoney et
al. (19) except that
absorbance values at 405 nm were measured after a 60-min development time.Surface Plasmon Resonance—All experiments were performed on
a BIACore 2000 system in HEPES-EP running buffer (10 mm HEPES, pH
7.4, 150 mm NaCl, 3 mm EDTA, 0.005% (v/v) surfactant
P20) at a constant flow rate of 10 μl/min. BMPs or sRANKL (0.37–0.5
μm in 40 μl of 10 mm sodium acetate, pH 4.0) were
coupled onto commercially available CM5 sensor chips preactivated with
N-hydroxysuccinimide and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)
carbodiimide. After immobilization of these proteins, binding analyses were
performed using 0–10 μm rhTSG-6, Link_TSG6, or CUB_C_TSG6,
where 100 μl of the protein solution was passed over the sensor chip
surface, and maximum equilibrium binding was determined 600 s after the start
of the injection. Scatchard analysis was performed to determine the validity
of the 1:1 Langmuir association/dissociation model, and data were analyzed
with Origin software (MicroCal) using a sum of least squares iterative
improvement method. These experiments were performed twice, and an average
dissociation constant was calculated.Statistical Analysis—All data were normalized and expressed
as percentages relative to controls. Each set of experiments was repeated at
least three times unless otherwise stated. For in vitro work,
differences between groups were analyzed using the unpaired Student's
t test or a Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test. p <
0.01 was considered significant. For the histomorphometric analysis of distal
femurs, a non-parametrical Kruskall-Wallis test was used; p < 0.05
was considered significant.
RESULTS
Effect of TSG-6 on sRANKL-induced Osteoclast Formation and
Activity—Human PBMCs were incubated with M-CSF and sRANKL for 14
days on coverslips to allow visualization of newly differentiated osteoclasts
or for 21 days on dentine slices to assay for activity in the form of lacunar
resorption. The addition of full-length rhTSG-6 to these cultures resulted in
a dose-dependent inhibition of osteoclast-mediated dentine erosion, with an
IC50 value of ∼15 ng/ml (∼0.5 nm), as
illustrated in Figs. 1, . There was no apparent reduction in the number or the
size of the multinucleated osteoclasts formed in TSG-6-treated cultures, as
assessed by staining of cells grown on coverslips for tartrate-resistant acid
phosphatase (Fig. 1);
in contrast, lacunar resorption was markedly reduced in the presence of TSG-6
(Fig. 1). Overall
these findings suggest that TSG-6 affects osteoclast activation rather than
differentiation. A comparison of the effects of rhTSG-6 with equimolar
quantities of Link_TSG6 and CUB_C_TSG6 on sRANKL-induced lacunar resorption
(see Fig. 2) revealed that the
isolated CUB_C domain has little effect on osteoclast function. In contrast,
the Link module retains significant activity, although this is less than that
of the intact protein.
FIGURE 1.
TSG-6 inhibits RANKL-mediated osteoclastogenesis. a, human
PBMCs were cultured with sRANKL and M-CSF in the absence or presence of
rhTSG-6 (0–50 ng/ml) for 21 days on dentine slices. Lacunar resorption
was assessed by light microscopy following staining with toluidine blue. Data
are expressed as mean percentage resorption (n = 9) ± S.E.,
compared with RANKL/M-CSF alone, where ** and *** =
p < 0.01, p < 0.001, respectively. b and
c, human PBMCs were cultured with sRANKL and M-CSF on dentine slices
(b) or coverslips (c) for 21 or 14 days, respectively, in
the absence (-) or presence (+) of rhTSG-6 (50 ng). Osteoclast formation or
activation was assessed by determining the extent of lacunar resorption
(b) or the number of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-positive
multinucleated cells (c), respectively.
FIGURE 2.
Full-length TSG-6 and its isolated Link module inhibit RANKL-induced
lacunar resorption. rhTSG-6 (0–50 ng/ml) or equimolar concentrations
of Link_TSG6 (Link) or CUB_C_TSG6 (CUB_C) were added to cultures of human
PBMCs in the presence of sRANKL and M-CSF. The extent of lacunar resorption of
dentine slices was assessed after 21 days. Data are expressed as the mean
percentage of resorption with RANKL alone (n = 12) ± S.E.,
where ** and *** = p < 0.01 and p
< 0.001, respectively.
TSG-6 inhibits RANKL-mediated osteoclastogenesis. a, human
PBMCs were cultured with sRANKL and M-CSF in the absence or presence of
rhTSG-6 (0–50 ng/ml) for 21 days on dentine slices. Lacunar resorption
was assessed by light microscopy following staining with toluidine blue. Data
are expressed as mean percentage resorption (n = 9) ± S.E.,
compared with RANKL/M-CSF alone, where ** and *** =
p < 0.01, p < 0.001, respectively. b and
c, human PBMCs were cultured with sRANKL and M-CSF on dentine slices
(b) or coverslips (c) for 21 or 14 days, respectively, in
the absence (-) or presence (+) of rhTSG-6 (50 ng). Osteoclast formation or
activation was assessed by determining the extent of lacunar resorption
(b) or the number of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-positive
multinucleated cells (c), respectively.sRANKL-mediated Osteoclastogenesis in TSG-6-deficient
Mice—Cells isolated from the marrow of long bones of
TSG-6-/- mice or wild type BALB/c animals (WT) were
cultured on dentine slices in the presence of M-CSF and sRANKL for 10 days. In
the case of the cells derived from TSG-6-deficient mice there was
substantially elevated osteoclast-mediated lacunar resorption compared with
controls (Fig. 3),
which is consistent with the severe arthritis and tissue damage reported in
these animals (35).
FIGURE 3.
a, osteoclast precursors from the long bone
marrow of TSG-6-/- and wild type BALB/c (WT) mice
were cultured on dentine slices in the absence (Media) or presence of
M-CSF and/or murine sRANKL for 10 days before the determination of lacunar
resorption. Data are plotted as mean percentage resorption (n = 4)
± S.E. for WT (black bars) and TSG-6-/-
(gray bars) mice. Lacunar resorption was significantly greater in the
presence of cells isolated from TSG-6-/- mice as compared
with WT; p = 0.03 for cultures containing sRANKL alone and p
= 0.004 for those with M-CSF and sRANKL. b, three-dimensional models
of the trabecular bone were generated after micro-CT scanning of the hind limb
distal femurs of WT (upper panel) and TSG-6-/-
(lower panel) male mice. Four mice were analyzed in each case, and
representative models are shown.
Full-length TSG-6 and its isolated Link module inhibit RANKL-induced
lacunar resorption. rhTSG-6 (0–50 ng/ml) or equimolar concentrations
of Link_TSG6 (Link) or CUB_C_TSG6 (CUB_C) were added to cultures of human
PBMCs in the presence of sRANKL and M-CSF. The extent of lacunar resorption of
dentine slices was assessed after 21 days. Data are expressed as the mean
percentage of resorption with RANKL alone (n = 12) ± S.E.,
where ** and *** = p < 0.01 and p
< 0.001, respectively.Micro-CT Analysis of Bones from
TSG-6-- and WT
Mice—Micro-CT was used to determine the histomorphometric
parameters of the distal femurs from the knees of TSG-6-/-
mice and WT controls (both on a BALB/c background). Preliminary analysis on
two pairs of mice indicated that the TSG-6 null animals had approximately
twice the bone mass of controls (data not shown). More detailed comparisons on
four different pairs confirmed that the percentage trabecular volume (Bv/Tv)
of the TSG-6-deficient animals (∼17%) is significantly greater than that
of the WT mice (∼13%, p = 0.02). TSG-6 knock-out animals also
show significant increases in trabecular number (Tb/N) and trabecular
thickness (Tb/Th) but not trabecular separation (Tb/Sp) (see
Table 1). This is illustrated
in Fig. 3, which
compares three-dimensional reconstructions of the trabecular bone network for
the TSG-6 null and WT animals. Taken together these findings show that
TSG-6-/- mice have increased bone mass compared with wild
type littermates, which is contrary to what we had expected based on the
effects of TSG-6 on osteoclastic resorption described above and suggests a
role for TSG-6 in normal bone homeostasis that might involve modulation of
osteoblast differentiation/activity.
TABLE 1
Histomorphometric parameters for the trabecular regions of distal femurs
from TSG-6–/– and WT mice
Mice
Trabecular volume (Bv/Tv)
Trabecular number (Tb/N)
Trabecular thickness (Tb/Th)
Trabecular separation (Tb/Sp)
WTa
12.8 (±0.81)
2.23 (±0.13)
0.057 (±0.001)
0.288 (±0.019)
TSG-6–/–a
17.0
(±0.42)b
2.66
(±0.04)b
0.064
(±0.002)b
0.256 (±0.012)
Average values shown (n = 4 ± S.E.)
Mean values were compared using a non-parametrical Kruskall-Wallis test and
found to differ significantly from WT (p ≤ 0.02)
Histomorphometric parameters for the trabecular regions of distal femurs
from TSG-6–/– and WT miceAverage values shown (n = 4 ± S.E.)Mean values were compared using a non-parametrical Kruskall-Wallis test and
found to differ significantly from WT (p ≤ 0.02)Immunolocalization of TSG-6 in Wild Type Mouse Knee
Joints—Immunohistochemistry of wild type murine knee joints
(Fig. 4) with anti-TSG-6
antibody showed immunoreactive TSG-6 to be associated with cells in the
superficial and midzones of the articular cartilage (panels i and
ii) and the lower region of hypertropic cartilage in the epiphyseal
growth plate (panel ii) as well as with meniscal fibrochondrocytes
(panel iv). In the synovium and periosteum only a few positively
stained cells were detected, where these have a flattened or fusiform shape
(panels iv and v). Notably, the strongest immunostaining was
associated with the cells in the epiphyseal and metaphyseal bone marrow of
both the femur and tibia (panels i, ii, iii, and v), at the
margins of bone marrow and trabecular bone, and in the extracellular matrix of
calcified cartilage adjoining the trabecular bone (indicated by
asterisks in panels ii and iii).
FIGURE 4.
Immunolocalization of TSG-6 in normal mouse knee joints. Sections
were immunostained for TSG-6 and HA, as described under “Experimental
Procedures.” Images were taken at 10× (panels i and
ii; scale bars = 400 μm) and 63× (panels ii,
iv, and v; scale bars = 100 μm) magnifications.
TSG-6 immunoreactivity is shown as red, HA as green, and
nuclei as blue fluorescence. BM, bone marrow; FCC,
femoral condyle cartilage; GP, epiphyseal growth plate cartilage;
MEN, meniscus; PO, periosteum; SCB, subcondral
bone; SYN, synovium; TPC, tibial plateau cartilage;
CL, cruciate ligament.
a, osteoclast precursors from the long bone
marrow of TSG-6-/- and wild type BALB/c (WT) mice
were cultured on dentine slices in the absence (Media) or presence of
M-CSF and/or murine sRANKL for 10 days before the determination of lacunar
resorption. Data are plotted as mean percentage resorption (n = 4)
± S.E. for WT (black bars) and TSG-6-/-
(gray bars) mice. Lacunar resorption was significantly greater in the
presence of cells isolated from TSG-6-/- mice as compared
with WT; p = 0.03 for cultures containing sRANKL alone and p
= 0.004 for those with M-CSF and sRANKL. b, three-dimensional models
of the trabecular bone were generated after micro-CT scanning of the hind limb
distal femurs of WT (upper panel) and TSG-6-/-
(lower panel) male mice. Four mice were analyzed in each case, and
representative models are shown.Immunolocalization of TSG-6 in normal mouse knee joints. Sections
were immunostained for TSG-6 and HA, as described under “Experimental
Procedures.” Images were taken at 10× (panels i and
ii; scale bars = 400 μm) and 63× (panels ii,
iv, and v; scale bars = 100 μm) magnifications.
TSG-6 immunoreactivity is shown as red, HA as green, and
nuclei as blue fluorescence. BM, bone marrow; FCC,
femoral condyle cartilage; GP, epiphyseal growth plate cartilage;
MEN, meniscus; PO, periosteum; SCB, subcondral
bone; SYN, synovium; TPC, tibial plateau cartilage;
CL, cruciate ligament.Effect of TSG-6 on BMP-2-induced Osteoblast
Differentiation—As a model of BMP-2-induced osteoblast
differentiation, we measured the production of ALP
(50) by two murine
pre-osteogenic cell lines (i.e. stromal MBA-15.4 cells
(Fig. 5) and
calvaria-derived MC3T3.E1 cells (Fig.
5)) cultured in the presence of BMP-2 with and without
the addition of TSG-6 proteins. The full-length protein caused a
dose-dependent reduction in BMP-2-induced ALP activity, with essentially
complete inhibition of differentiation seen at 33 and 6.6 nm TSG-6
for the MBA-15.4 and MC3T3.E1 cell lines, respectively. In contrast, neither
Link_TSG6 nor CUB_C_TSG6 had significant effects on ALP release by these cells
(Fig. 5).
FIGURE 5.
TSG-6 inhibits BMP-2-induced osteoblastogenesis. The murine
pre-osteoblast cell lines MBA-15.4 (a) and MC3T3-E1 (b) were
cultured for 7 days with BMP-2 in the absence or presence of rhTSG-6 (at
0–10000 ng/ml) or molar equivalents of Link_TSG6 or CUB_C_TSG6. ALP
activity was measured, and values were plotted as the mean ALP activity as a
percentage of control (n = 8 ± S.E.) where the addition of
BMP-2 alone was normalized to 100%; ** and *** =
p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively, compared with
BMP-2 alone. MBA-15.4 cells (a) were more responsive to BMP-2 than
MC3T3-E1 cells (b), with ALP activity up-regulated by 272 and 37%,
respectively. §, data for control cells with no added rhTSG-6, Link_TSG6,
or CUB_C_TSG6 are shown as 0 pm protein; data from cells with added
TSG-6 proteins are plotted on a log scale.
Interactions of TSG-6 with BMPs and sRANKL—The interactions
of TSG-6 with BMP-2 and other BMPs were investigated using ELISAs. As
illustrated in Fig. 6, BMP-2
and the structurally and functionally related BMP-4, -5, -6, -7, -13, and -14
all interact with TSG-6, whereas there is no apparent binding to the more
distantly related BMP-3. Further analysis of BMP-2 and two other
representative BMPs (i.e. BMP-13 and -14) revealed that Link_TSG6 and
CUB_C_TSG6 (Fig. 7) have a
lower level of binding to these immobilized proteins compared with full-length
TSG-6. Surface plasmon resonance experiments, where TSG-6 or its individual
domains were flowed over BMP-coupled chips, allowed determination of the
affinities for these interactions. The dissociation constants for TSG-6
binding to BMP-2, -13, and -14 are all ∼0.2 μm
(Table 2). In the case of
BMP-2, its interactions with the Link module and CUB_C domain are both
∼11-fold weaker, suggesting that BMP-2 interacts with a composite binding
surface on TSG-6 that involves both these domains. Similarly, BMP-13 and -14
have lower affinities for the isolated domains of TSG-6 compared with the
full-length protein. However, these BMPs both bind more strongly to the Link
module than the CUB_C domain, perhaps indicating that the Link module makes a
greater contribution to the interaction surfaces in these cases.
FIGURE 6.
TSG-6 interacts with members of the BMP superfamily. The binding of
rhTSG-6 to BMP-coated wells was determined colorimetrically. Values are
plotted as the mean absorbance at 405 nm (n = 4 ± S.E.) after
a 30-min development time. These data are representative of two or three
independent experiments.
FIGURE 7.
BMPs exhibit tighter binding to full-length TSG-6 than to its Link and
CUB_C domains. The interactions of full-length rhTSG-6 (•) with
immobilized BMP-2, -13, or -14 were compared with Link_TSG6 (♦)
(a) or CUB_C_TSG6 (▪) (b). Protein binding was detected
using antibodies specific for the Link module or CUB_C domain as appropriate.
Values are plotted as the mean absorbance at 405 nm (n = 8 ±
S.E.) after 60-min (a) or 30-min (b) development times.
TABLE 2
Dissociation constants for the interactions of TSG-6 and its isolated
domains with BMPs and sRANKL, determined by surface plasmon resonance
Proteina
Kd TSG-6
Kd Link_TSG6
Kd CUB_C_TSG6
μm
μm
μm
BMP-2
0.220b
2.43
2.54
BMP-13
0.236
2.84
6.88
BMP-14
0.184
1.10
10.8
sRANKL
1.97
8.25
—c
Each experiment was performed in duplicate with the average values shown
here; all interactions conformed to a 1:1 Langmuir model
Dissociation constants are expressed to three significant figures
A value could not be obtained due to the low level of signal (response
units) detected, combined with nonspecific binding to the sensor chip
Dissociation constants for the interactions of TSG-6 and its isolated
domains with BMPs and sRANKL, determined by surface plasmon resonanceEach experiment was performed in duplicate with the average values shown
here; all interactions conformed to a 1:1 Langmuir modelDissociation constants are expressed to three significant figuresA value could not be obtained due to the low level of signal (response
units) detected, combined with nonspecific binding to the sensor chipWe also investigated the interactions TSG-6, Link_TSG6, and CUB_C_TSG6 with
sRANKL by ELISA and surface plasmon resonance. As can be seen from
Fig. 8, , full-length TSG-6 binds well to immobilized sRANKL,
whereas equivalent amounts (5 pmol/well) of Link_TSG6 or the CUB_C domain show
less binding. Similarly, when sRANKL was incubated with plates coated with the
TSG-6 proteins (Fig.
8), the extent of binding to Link_TSG6 and CUB_C_TSG6
was lower than that seen for the full-length protein. These data suggest that,
like BMP-2, -13, and -14, sRANKL binds to a composite interaction surface
involving both the Link and CUB_C domains of TSG-6. Consistent with this,
surface plasmon resonance analysis revealed that full-length TSG-6 bound to
immobilized sRANKL with an ∼4-fold higher affinity than the isolated Link
module (i.e. about 2 and 8 μm, respectively), although
we were unable to obtain a K value for CUB_C_TSG6 (see
Table 1).
FIGURE 8.
TSG-6 interacts with sRANKL via its Link and CUB_C domains. The
interactions of rhTSG-6, Link_TSG6, or CUB_C_TSG6 with sRANKL were compared
where either the sRANKL (a and b) or TSG-6 proteins
(c) were immobilized on microtiter plates. Absorbance values at 405
nm were measured after 20 min (a), 30 min (b), or 60 min
(c) and are plotted as mean values (n = 8 ±
S.E.).
TSG-6 inhibits BMP-2-induced osteoblastogenesis. The murine
pre-osteoblast cell lines MBA-15.4 (a) and MC3T3-E1 (b) were
cultured for 7 days with BMP-2 in the absence or presence of rhTSG-6 (at
0–10000 ng/ml) or molar equivalents of Link_TSG6 or CUB_C_TSG6. ALP
activity was measured, and values were plotted as the mean ALP activity as a
percentage of control (n = 8 ± S.E.) where the addition of
BMP-2 alone was normalized to 100%; ** and *** =
p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively, compared with
BMP-2 alone. MBA-15.4 cells (a) were more responsive to BMP-2 than
MC3T3-E1 cells (b), with ALP activity up-regulated by 272 and 37%,
respectively. §, data for control cells with no added rhTSG-6, Link_TSG6,
or CUB_C_TSG6 are shown as 0 pm protein; data from cells with added
TSG-6 proteins are plotted on a log scale.As described above, BMP-2 and sRANKL both bind with higher affinity to the
intact TSG-6 protein compared with its isolated domains. In addition, the
full-length protein has more potent biological effects than the Link_TSG6 or
CUB_C_TSG6 domains (see Figs. 2
and 5). Together this provides
evidence that TSG-6-mediated inhibition of osteoblastogenesis and of
osteoclastic resorption is likely to be mediated via its direct interaction
with BMP-2 and RANKL, respectively.TSG-6 interacts with members of the BMP superfamily. The binding of
rhTSG-6 to BMP-coated wells was determined colorimetrically. Values are
plotted as the mean absorbance at 405 nm (n = 4 ± S.E.) after
a 30-min development time. These data are representative of two or three
independent experiments.
DISCUSSION
Although it is well established that TSG-6 is protective in various
experimental models of arthritis
(31–35),
the exact mechanism(s) by which its effects are mediated remains unclear. Here
we have identified two novel functions for TSG-6; it inhibits both
sRANKL-induced bone resorption by osteoclasts and BMP-2-induced osteoblast
differentiation, which may have a key role in protecting joint tissues during
disease and in the regulation of bone homeostasis.Our functional and ligand binding studies suggest that these activities of
TSG-6 are mediated through its interactions with RANKL or BMP-2 (and possibly
other BMPs), respectively, where both of these are likely to require composite
binding surfaces involving the Link module and CUB_C domain of TSG-6. In this
respect, the new binding partners reported here differ from most other TSG-6
ligands (e.g. HA, heparin, bikunin, pentraxin-3, and
thrombospondin-1), which have binding sites within the Link module
(22). At present, the only
known ligand that binds outside this region of TSG-6 is fibronectin, which
interacts with the CUB_C domain
(12).In this study we have shown that osteoclasts derived from
TSG-6-/- mice give rise to a marked elevation in dentine
resorption compared with those from wild type controls, which is consistent
with the severe bone erosion seen in TSG-6-/- mice with
proteoglycan-induced arthritis
(35). These experiments also
demonstrate that TSG-6 is produced by bone marrow-derived cells (e.g.
pre-osteoclasts and/or stromal cells) in response to stimulation with
sRANKL/M-CSF and, thus, that TSG-6 has an autocrine and/or paracrine function
in this tissue.RANKL, the major regulator of osteoclast differentiation
(51,
52), is expressed on
osteoblasts as well as on dendritic cells and T cells
(53,
54) in response to
calciotropic factors such as prostaglandin E2, IL-1, and TNF
(55). The combination of IL-1
or TNF with IL-17 is particularly potent at inducing RANKL expression,
e.g. in synoviocytes
(56). RANKL binds to its
receptor RANK on mononuclear osteoclast precursors
(57), where this interaction
not only induces osteoclast differentiation but also stimulates the bone
resorbing activity of mature osteoclasts
(58). We have shown here that
TSG-6 inhibits RANKL-induced bone resorption by human osteoclasts in a
dose-dependent manner. Our data suggest that TSG-6 acts at the point of
osteoclast activation, since we observed inhibition of dentine erosion, but no
reduction in osteoclast number or size when TSG-6 was added to PBMC cultures.
It seems reasonable to suggest that TSG-6 might mediate this effect by binding
directly to RANKL, thereby blocking its association with RANK; however,
further studies are required to demonstrate this definitively.BMPs exhibit tighter binding to full-length TSG-6 than to its Link and
CUB_C domains. The interactions of full-length rhTSG-6 (•) with
immobilized BMP-2, -13, or -14 were compared with Link_TSG6 (♦)
(a) or CUB_C_TSG6 (▪) (b). Protein binding was detected
using antibodies specific for the Link module or CUB_C domain as appropriate.
Values are plotted as the mean absorbance at 405 nm (n = 8 ±
S.E.) after 60-min (a) or 30-min (b) development times.At present, osteoprotegerin (OPG), a soluble decoy receptor for RANKL, is
the only known antagonist of the RANKL/RANK interaction that can effectively
inhibit osteoclast maturation and activation in vitro
(59). Furthermore, studies on
rats with antigen-induced arthritis showed RANKL (expressed on the surface of
synovial effector T cells) to be the key mediator of joint damage and bone
erosion, where treatment with OPG provided protection against these effects
(60). The ability of TSG-6 to
inhibit RANKL-induced osteoclast activity, possibly in a manner similar to OPG
(i.e. via a direct interaction with RANKL), thus makes it a potential
model for the development of therapeutics. The dissociation constant observed
here for the TSG-6/sRANKL interaction (∼2 μm) is 3 orders of
magnitude higher than that reported for the binding of OPG to RANKL
(61). However, as noted by
Schneeweis et al.
(61), the tight binding
observed for OPG/RANKL (K = 10 nm) is likely
to be due the formation of 1:1 complexes between homodimers of OPG and
homotrimers of RANKL, i.e. leading to a high avidity
(61). Interestingly, a
truncated form of OPG containing the RANKL-binding site but lacking the
dimerization domain bound RANKL with a K of ∼3
μm. Our study utilized monomeric sRANKL, and it is possible that
the interaction of TSG-6 with trimeric RANKL might have a considerably higher
affinity; however, this remains to be investigated. In the lacunar resorption
assay used here, sRANKL (Mr = 20 kDa) is present at a
concentration of 50 ng/ml (2.5 nm), and we observed that rhTSG-6
inhibited dentine erosion with an IC50 of ∼15 ng/ml (∼0.5
nm). By comparison, human recombinant OPG (R&D Systems; 43.5
kDa) was found to have an IC50 value of ∼0.25 nm in
this assay.6 This is
consistent with a previous investigation of osteoclast formation from
arthrosplasty-derived macrophages, showing that humanOPG inhibited lacunar
resorption with an IC50 of between 50 and 100 ng/ml (∼1.5
nm) (62). Overall
this indicates that TSG-6 has a similar potency to OPG in the in
vitro inhibition of osteoclastic resorption.TSG-6 interacts with sRANKL via its Link and CUB_C domains. The
interactions of rhTSG-6, Link_TSG6, or CUB_C_TSG6 with sRANKL were compared
where either the sRANKL (a and b) or TSG-6 proteins
(c) were immobilized on microtiter plates. Absorbance values at 405
nm were measured after 20 min (a), 30 min (b), or 60 min
(c) and are plotted as mean values (n = 8 ±
S.E.).Our observation that unchallenged TSG-6-/- mice have
higher trabecular bone mass than wild type controls might at first glance
appear to be at odds with the inhibitory effect of TSG-6 on bone erosion
described above. However, we hypothesize that, although TSG-6 inhibits
osteoclast activity at inflammatory sites, it also has a pivotal role in
normal bone homeostasis. This is supported by our finding that TSG-6 is
expressed in normal joint tissue (e.g. in bone marrow) and that it
significantly reduces the production of ALP (a marker of differentiation) by
osteoblast precursors stimulated with BMP-2. Tsukahara et al.
(63) have also described
inhibition of BMP-2-mediated osteoblastogenesis after overexpression of TSG-6
in human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC) or by the addition of partially
purified recombinant TSG-6 proteins to hMSC cultures; binding of TSG-6 to
BMP-2 was detected in these systems by immunoprecipitation. The authors
proposed that the Link module of TSG-6 is responsible for inhibition of
osteoblast differentiation via interaction with BMP-2, based on
semiquantitative experiments using deletion mutants where, for example,
protein lacking the Link module was found to be inactive. This conclusion is
inconsistent with our results that were obtained using defined amounts of
pure, highly characterized protein preparations
(12–14,
18). It should be noted that,
although Tsukahara et al.
(63) report little or no
inhibition of ALP expression or immunoprecipitation of BMP-2/TSG-6 complex
with their deletion mutant lacking the Link module, their data also show a
substantial reduction in these effects (compared with full-length TSG-6) with
the ΔCUB deletion mutant. We suggest that our data and that of Tsukahara
et al. (63) are
consistent with BMP-2 binding to a surface that involves both the Link and CUB
modules of TSG-6.The ability of TSG-6 to interact with members of the TGFβ/BMP
superfamily closely related to BMP-2
(64), namely BMP-4, -5, -6,
-7, -13, and -14, further supports the hypothesis that TSG-6 has a role in
bone homeostasis. BMP-2, -6, -7, and -9 are important in inducing the
differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into osteoblasts
(65,
66), whereas most other BMPs
are able to stimulate osteogenesis in mature osteoblasts
(67–71).
TSG-6 might also have regulatory roles in other contexts, e.g. BMP-4
has been implicated in tooth development
(72), BMP-2 and -4 are
required for limb patterning
(73), and BMP-2 is essential
for the initiation of fracture repair
(74). In this regard TSG-6 may
function like some of the known BMP antagonists, i.e. those of the
chordin family, noggin (75),
gremlin (76), and brorin
(77), as well as SOST
(78), GDF3
(79), and the recently
discovered suppressors of mineralization such as asporin
(80), Nov
(81), and osteoclast
inhibitory lectin (82).
Interestingly, we have shown that TSG-6 does not bind to BMP-3, an antagonist
of osteogenic BMPs that blocks differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells into
osteoblasts (83).In addition to its role in osteogenesis, BMP-2 can induce cartilage
formation and is expressed at elevated levels around lesions (e.g. in
osteoarthritis), suggesting that it might contribute to cartilage repair
(84). A recent study, looking
at the effects of BMP-2 overexpression in murine knee joints, has shown that
this protein promotes matrix turnover in cartilage with increased proteoglycan
synthesis and aggrecan degradation
(85). Furthermore, blocking of
BMP-2 activity (by gremlin) in IL-1-damaged cartilage gave rise to an overall
decrease in proteoglycan content. It is not yet known whether TSG-6, which is
expressed by chondrocytes in response to IL-1
(28,
29), can inhibit
BMP-2-mediated functions in cartilage and if so whether this contributes to
its protective effects in arthritis.The significantly higher bone mass that we have observed in the present
study in TSG-6-/- mice compared with wild type animals
provides compelling evidence that TSG-6 has an in vivo role in the
regulation of bone formation. Although we have demonstrated that TSG-6 can
inhibit BMP-2-mediated osteoblast differentiation in vitro, we cannot
rule out that TSG-6 may also affect the activities of other modulators of
osteoblastogenesis (e.g. l-ascorbate and
1,25-(OH)-2-vitamin D3 (86,
87)), which will require
further investigation.In this study we have shown that TSG-6 is expressed in mouse knee joints,
where the strongest TSG-6 immunostaining was associated with the cells in the
epiphyseal and metaphyseal bone marrow and at the margins of bone marrow and
trabecular bone. Our in vitro cell culture experiments are also
consistent with TSG-6 being produced by bone marrow-derived cells in mice. OPG
and RANKL have been shown to co-localize in the bone marrow lining cells,
osteoblasts, and newly embedded osteocytes at sites of bone remodeling in rats
(88). In addition, in rattibiae, ALP activity (a marker of BMP-2-mediated differentiation) has been
detected on osteoblasts and some bone marrow fibroblastic stromal cells, in
particular those cells closest to the bone surface
(89). These observations are
indicative that TSG-6 is present within the bone marrow at similar
localizations to BMP-2, RANKL, and OPG during bone remodeling.The above data have led us to hypothesize that TSG-6 might coordinately
regulate the activities of osteoclasts and osteoblasts, thus having a key role
in bone turnover. The molecular basis for these opposing functions and how
they are differentially controlled remains to be determined. What is clear is
that TSG-6 is a novel regulator of bone cell biology with potent effects on
two processes that are central to both normal physiology and articular joint
disease.
Authors: D Margerie; J Flechtenmacher; F H Büttner; A Karbowski; W Puhl; R Schleyerbach; E Bartnik Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: W S Simonet; D L Lacey; C R Dunstan; M Kelley; M S Chang; R Lüthy; H Q Nguyen; S Wooden; L Bennett; T Boone; G Shimamoto; M DeRose; R Elliott; A Colombero; H L Tan; G Trail; J Sullivan; E Davy; N Bucay; L Renshaw-Gegg; T M Hughes; D Hill; W Pattison; P Campbell; S Sander; G Van; J Tarpley; P Derby; R Lee; W J Boyle Journal: Cell Date: 1997-04-18 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Lisa J Robinson; Irina Tourkova; Yujuan Wang; Allison C Sharrow; Michael S Landau; Beatrice B Yaroslavskiy; Li Sun; Mone Zaidi; Harry C Blair Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: H-G Wisniewski; E Colón; V Liublinska; R J Karia; T V Stabler; M Attur; S B Abramson; P A Band; V B Kraus Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Natalia S Baranova; Erik Nilebäck; F Michael Haller; David C Briggs; Sofia Svedhem; Anthony J Day; Ralf P Richter Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-05-19 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Mary Y Chang; Christina K Chan; Kathleen R Braun; Pattie S Green; Kevin D O'Brien; Alan Chait; Anthony J Day; Thomas N Wight Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2012-02-20 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Rebecca L Hull; Pamela Y Johnson; Kathleen R Braun; Anthony J Day; Thomas N Wight Journal: J Histochem Cytochem Date: 2012-07-21 Impact factor: 2.479