Literature DB >> 18586522

Neural correlates of novelty and face-age effects in young and elderly adults.

Christopher I Wright1, Alyson Negreira, Andrea L Gold, Jennifer C Britton, Danielle Williams, Lisa Feldman Barrett.   

Abstract

The human amygdala preferentially responds to objects of potential value, such as hedonically valenced and novel stimuli. Many studies have documented age-related differences in amygdala responses to valenced stimuli, but relatively little is known about age-related changes in the amygdala's response to novelty. This study examines whether there are differences in amygdala novelty responses in two different age groups. Healthy young and elderly adults viewed both young and elderly faces that were seen many times (familiar faces) or only once (novel faces) in the context of an fMRI study. We observed that amygdala responses to novel (versus familiar) faces were preserved with aging, suggesting that novelty processing in the amygdala remains stable across the lifespan. In addition, participants demonstrated larger amygdala responses to target faces of the same age group than to age out-group target faces (i.e., an age in-group effect). Differences in anatomic localization and behavioral results suggest that novelty and age in-group effects were differentially processed in the amygdala.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18586522      PMCID: PMC2613685          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  60 in total

Review 1.  The amygdala: vigilance and emotion.

Authors:  M Davis; P J Whalen
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 15.992

2.  Effect of familiarity on the processing of human faces.

Authors:  S Dubois; B Rossion; C Schiltz; J M Bodart; C Michel; R Bruyer; M Crommelinck
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Amygdala circuitry in attentional and representational processes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain.

Authors:  Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Age-related differences in the medial temporal lobe responses to emotional faces as revealed by fMRI.

Authors:  Tetsuya Iidaka; Tomohisa Okada; Tetsuhito Murata; Masao Omori; Hirotaka Kosaka; Norihiro Sadato; Yoshiharu Yonekura
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.

Authors:  K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; D A Chesler; I E Goldberg; R M Weisskoff; B P Poncelet; D N Kennedy; B E Hoppel; M S Cohen; R Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Thalamic and amygdala-hippocampal volume reductions in first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia: an MRI-based morphometric analysis.

Authors:  L J Seidman; S V Faraone; J M Goldstein; J M Goodman; W S Kremen; R Toomey; J Tourville; D Kennedy; N Makris; V S Caviness; M T Tsuang
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Part V. A normative study of the neuropsychological battery.

Authors:  K A Welsh; N Butters; R C Mohs; D Beekly; S Edland; G Fillenbaum; A Heyman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  The effects of stimulus novelty and familiarity on neuronal activity in the amygdala of monkeys performing recognition memory tasks.

Authors:  F A Wilson; E T Rolls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  An encoding advantage for own-race versus other-race faces.

Authors:  Pamela M Walker; James W Tanaka
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  31 in total

1.  Both younger and older adults have difficulty updating emotional memories.

Authors:  Kaoru Nashiro; Michiko Sakaki; Derek Huffman; Mara Mather
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Differential hemodynamic response in affective circuitry with aging: an FMRI study of novelty, valence, and arousal.

Authors:  Yoshiya Moriguchi; Alyson Negreira; Mariann Weierich; Rebecca Dautoff; Bradford C Dickerson; Christopher I Wright; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Electrophysiological correlates of processing faces of younger and older individuals.

Authors:  Natalie C Ebner; Yi He; Harlan M Fichtenholtz; Gregory McCarthy; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Kristen A Lindquist; Tor D Wager; Hedy Kober; Eliza Bliss-Moreau; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 12.579

5.  II. Cognitive performance of middle-aged female rats is influenced by capacity to metabolize progesterone in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus.

Authors:  Jason J Paris; Alicia A Walf; Cheryl A Frye
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 6.  Age differences in brain activity during emotion processing: reflections of age-related decline or increased emotion regulation?

Authors:  Kaoru Nashiro; Michiko Sakaki; Mara Mather
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 5.140

7.  Disentangling the effects of novelty, valence and trait anxiety in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, amygdala and hippocampus with high resolution 7T fMRI.

Authors:  Walker S Pedersen; L Tugan Muftuler; Christine L Larson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  I know I've seen you before: Distinguishing recent-single-exposure-based familiarity from pre-existing familiarity.

Authors:  Sarah I Gimbel; James B Brewer; Anat Maril
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 9.  Historical pitfalls and new directions in the neuroscience of emotion.

Authors:  Lisa Feldman Barrett; Ajay B Satpute
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  ERP evidence for own-age effects on late stages of processing sad faces.

Authors:  Mara Fölster; Katja Werheid
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.