Andrew T Clark1, Pamela W Ewan. 1. Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom. atclark@doctors.org.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of nut allergy causes anxiety. Few studies exist that estimate risk of reactions and inform management. OBJECTIVE: To describe frequency and circumstances of reactions after the institution of a management plan. METHODS: Prospective study of children with peanut/nut allergy with an allergist's management plan. Severity and circumstances of worst reaction before diagnosis (index) and follow-up reactions were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 785 children were followed for 3640 patient-years from diagnosis. Index reactions were mild in 66% (516), moderate in 29% (224), and severe in 5% (45). Fourteen percent (114/785) had follow-up reactions (3% annual incidence rate). Ninety percent had the same/reduced severity grade, and 1 of 785 (0.1%) had a severe reaction. Preschool children (n = 263) had a low incidence of reactions, and none were severe. There was a 3-fold reduction in injected epinephrine use from that used in the index reaction, required in 1 severe reaction, never twice; 14% (16/114) required no medication, 78% only oral antihistamines. Forty-eight percent reacted to the index nut type, 19% to a different nut (55% sensitized at diagnosis, 14% not sensitized, 31% not tested). Accidental versus index reactions were 4-fold more likely to be a result of contact exposure rather than ingestion. Contact reactions were always mild. Most (53%) reactions occurred at home, 5% in school, 21% at other sites (21% not recorded). The nut was given by a parent/self in 69 (61%) reactions or teacher in 5 (4%). CONCLUSION: With a comprehensive management plan, accidental reactions were uncommon and usually mild, most requiring little treatment; 99.8% self-treated appropriately and 100% effectively.
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of nutallergy causes anxiety. Few studies exist that estimate risk of reactions and inform management. OBJECTIVE: To describe frequency and circumstances of reactions after the institution of a management plan. METHODS: Prospective study of children with peanut/nutallergy with an allergist's management plan. Severity and circumstances of worst reaction before diagnosis (index) and follow-up reactions were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 785 children were followed for 3640 patient-years from diagnosis. Index reactions were mild in 66% (516), moderate in 29% (224), and severe in 5% (45). Fourteen percent (114/785) had follow-up reactions (3% annual incidence rate). Ninety percent had the same/reduced severity grade, and 1 of 785 (0.1%) had a severe reaction. Preschool children (n = 263) had a low incidence of reactions, and none were severe. There was a 3-fold reduction in injected epinephrine use from that used in the index reaction, required in 1 severe reaction, never twice; 14% (16/114) required no medication, 78% only oral antihistamines. Forty-eight percent reacted to the index nut type, 19% to a different nut (55% sensitized at diagnosis, 14% not sensitized, 31% not tested). Accidental versus index reactions were 4-fold more likely to be a result of contact exposure rather than ingestion. Contact reactions were always mild. Most (53%) reactions occurred at home, 5% in school, 21% at other sites (21% not recorded). The nut was given by a parent/self in 69 (61%) reactions or teacher in 5 (4%). CONCLUSION: With a comprehensive management plan, accidental reactions were uncommon and usually mild, most requiring little treatment; 99.8% self-treated appropriately and 100% effectively.
Authors: Julie Barnett; Kate Muncer; Jo Leftwich; Richard Shepherd; Monique M Raats; M Hazel Gowland; Kate Grimshaw; Jane S Lucas Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-09-26 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Ananth Thyagarajan; Pooja Varshney; Stacie M Jones; Scott Sicherer; Robert Wood; Brian P Vickery; Hugh Sampson; A Wesley Burks Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: A Thyagarajan; S M Jones; A Calatroni; L Pons; M Kulis; C S Woo; M Kamalakannan; B P Vickery; A M Scurlock; A Wesley Burks; W G Shreffler Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 5.018