Literature DB >> 18585567

Digital images for postsurgical follow-up of tympanostomy tubes in remote Alaska.

John Kokesh1, A Stewart Ferguson, Chris Patricoski, Kathryn Koller, Greg Zwack, Ellen Provost, Peter Holck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if video otoscope still images of the tympanic membrane taken in remote clinics are comparable to an in-person microscopic examination for follow-up care.
DESIGN: Comparative concordance, diagnostic reliability.
METHODS: Community health aide/practitioners in remote Alaska imaged 70 ears following tympanostomy tube placement. The patients were then examined in person by two otolaryngologists. Images were later reviewed at 8 and 14 weeks.
RESULTS: Intraprovider concordance for physical examination findings was: "Tube in," 94 percent -97 percent (kappa = 0.89-0.94); "Tube patent," 94 percent -97 percent (kappa = 0.89-0.94); "Drainage," 90 percent -96 percent (kappa = -0.04-0.38); "Perforation," 90 percent -96 percent (kappa = 0.61-0.82); "Granulation," 97 percent -100 percent (kappa = 0.49-1.0); "Middle ear fluid," 88 percent -96 percent (kappa = 0.28-0.71); "Retracted," 83 percent -91 percent (kappa = 0.26-0.58). These agreement rates are similar to interprovider concordance when two otolaryngologists examine the same patient in person. Intraprovider concordance for diagnoses was 76 percent -80 percent (kappa = 0.64-0.71) and 77 percent -88 percent (kappa = 0.66-0.81) when poor images were excluded. Interprovider diagnostic concordance for the in-person exam was 89 percent (kappa = 0.83).
CONCLUSION: Video-otoscopy images of the tympanic membrane are comparable to an in-person examination for assessment and treatment of patients following tympanostomy tubes. Store-and-forward telemedicine is an acceptable method of following patients post tympanostomy tube placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18585567     DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  11 in total

1.  Prospective Evaluation of a Smartphone Otoscope for Home Tympanostomy Tube Surveillance: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Debra M Don; Jeffrey A Koempel; Laurel M Fisher; Choo Phei Wee; Beth Osterbauer
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Feasibility of community health workers as teleaudiology patient-site facilitators: a multilevel training study.

Authors:  Laura Coco; Rosie Piper; Nicole Marrone
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.437

3.  Hearing Norton Sound: a community randomised trial protocol to address childhood hearing loss in rural Alaska.

Authors:  Susan D Emmett; Samantha Kleindienst Robler; Nae-Yuh Wang; Alain Labrique; Joseph J Gallo; Philip Hofstetter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Cost savings associated with an outpatient otolaryngology telemedicine clinic.

Authors:  Ramez Philips; Nolan Seim; Laura Matrka; Brittany Locklear; Aaron C Moberly; Mark Inman; Garth Essig
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-14

5.  The role of community health workers in addressing the global burden of ear disease and hearing loss: a systematic scoping review of the literature.

Authors:  James O'Donovan; Misha Verkerk; Niall Winters; Shelly Chadha; Mahmood F Bhutta
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2019-03-01

Review 6.  Telemedicine in Audiology. Best practice recommendations from the French Society of Audiology (SFA) and the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (SFORL).

Authors:  H Thai-Van; D Bakhos; D Bouccara; N Loundon; M Marx; T Mom; I Mosnier; S Roman; C Villerabel; C Vincent; F Venail
Journal:  Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.665

7.  Digital Otoscopy Videos Versus Composite Images: A Reader Study to Compare the Accuracy of ENT Physicians.

Authors:  Hamidullah Binol; Muhammad Khalid Khan Niazi; Garth Essig; Jay Shah; Jameson K Mattingly; Michael S Harris; Charles Elmaraghy; Theodoros Teknos; Nazhat Taj-Schaal; Lianbo Yu; Metin N Gurcan; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Telemedicine in tinnitus: feasibility, advantages, limitations, and perspectives.

Authors:  Matthieu J Guitton
Journal:  ISRN Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-14

9.  Telescopic otology referrals: Evaluation of feasibility and acceptability.

Authors:  Elizabeth Cottrell; Ajith George; Chris Coulson; Ruth Chambers
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-03-03

Review 10.  A Review of Telemedicine Applications in Otorhinolaryngology: Considerations During the Coronavirus Disease of 2019 Pandemic.

Authors:  Amrita K Singh; David A Kasle; Roy Jiang; Jordan Sukys; Emily L Savoca; Michael Z Lerner; Nikita Kohli
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.