Literature DB >> 33170529

Digital Otoscopy Videos Versus Composite Images: A Reader Study to Compare the Accuracy of ENT Physicians.

Hamidullah Binol1, Muhammad Khalid Khan Niazi1, Garth Essig2, Jay Shah3, Jameson K Mattingly2, Michael S Harris4, Charles Elmaraghy2, Theodoros Teknos5, Nazhat Taj-Schaal6, Lianbo Yu7, Metin N Gurcan1, Aaron C Moberly2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: With the increasing emphasis on developing effective telemedicine approaches in Otolaryngology, this study explored whether a single composite image stitched from a digital otoscopy video provides acceptable diagnostic information to make an accurate diagnosis, as compared with that provided by the full video. STUDY
DESIGN: Diagnostic survey analysis.
METHODS: Five Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) physicians reviewed the same set of 78 digital otoscope eardrum videos from four eardrum conditions: normal, effusion, retraction, and tympanosclerosis, along with the composite images generated by a SelectStitch method that selectively uses video frames with computer-assisted selection, as well as a Stitch method that incorporates all the video frames. Participants provided a diagnosis for each item along with a rating of diagnostic confidence. Diagnostic accuracy for each pathology of SelectStitch was compared with accuracy when reviewing the entire video clip and when reviewing the Stitch image.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy for physicians reviewing SelectStitch images and full video clips, but both provided better diagnostic accuracy than Stitch images. The inter-reader agreement was moderate.
CONCLUSIONS: Equal to using full video clips, composite images of eardrums generated by SelectStitch provided sufficient information for ENTs to make the correct diagnoses for most pathologies. These findings suggest that use of a composite eardrum image may be sufficient for telemedicine approaches to ear diagnosis, eliminating the need for storage and transmission of large video files, along with future applications for improved documentation in electronic medical record systems, patient/family counseling, and clinical training. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:E1668-E1676, 2021.
© 2020 American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society Inc, "The Triological Society" and American Laryngological Association (ALA).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-assisted Diagnosis; eardrum; image stitching; otoscope; telemedicine

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33170529      PMCID: PMC8610175          DOI: 10.1002/lary.29253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  19 in total

1.  Low-cost ISDN videoconferencing equipment for orthopaedic second opinions.

Authors:  F Baruffaldi; P Mattioli; A Toni; P J Klutke; K H Englmeier
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 6.184

Review 2.  Otoscopic evaluation of the ear canal.

Authors:  Lynette K Cole
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.093

3.  Digital otoscopy versus microscopy: How correct and confident are ear experts in their diagnoses?

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Margaret Zhang; Lianbo Yu; Metin Gurcan; Caglar Senaras; Theodoros N Teknos; Charles A Elmaraghy; Nazhat Taj-Schaal; Garth F Essig
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 6.184

4.  Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pediatric Otolaryngology Perspective.

Authors:  Sarah E Maurrasse; Jeff C Rastatter; Stephen R Hoff; Kathleen R Billings; Taher S Valika
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.497

5.  Optimization of burn referrals.

Authors:  Hanna K Reiband; Kira Lundin; Bjarne Alsbjørn; Anne Marie Sørensen; Lars S Rasmussen
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.744

6.  Telemedicine for acute plastic surgical trauma and burns.

Authors:  D L Wallace; S M Jones; C Milroy; M A Pickford
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Developing a synchronous otolaryngology telemedicine Clinic: Prospective study to assess fidelity and diagnostic concordance.

Authors:  Nolan B Seim; Ramez H W Philips; Laura A Matrka; Brittany Locklear; Mark Inman; Aaron C Moberly; Garth F Essig
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Automated diagnosis of otitis media: vocabulary and grammar.

Authors:  Anupama Kuruvilla; Nader Shaikh; Alejandro Hoberman; Jelena Kovačević
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2013-08-07

9.  Smartphone-enabled wireless otoscope-assisted online telemedicine during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Authors:  Xiangming Meng; Zhiyong Dai; Chao Hang; Yangyang Wang
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 1.808

10.  OtoMatch: Content-based eardrum image retrieval using deep learning.

Authors:  Seda Camalan; Muhammad Khalid Khan Niazi; Aaron C Moberly; Theodoros Teknos; Garth Essig; Charles Elmaraghy; Nazhat Taj-Schaal; Metin N Gurcan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Smartphone-Enabled versus Conventional Otoscopy in Detecting Middle Ear Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chih-Hao Chen; Chii-Yuan Huang; Hsiu-Lien Cheng; Heng-Yu Haley Lin; Yuan-Chia Chu; Chun-Yu Chang; Ying-Hui Lai; Mao-Che Wang; Yen-Fu Cheng
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-13

2.  Shortwave infrared otoscopy for diagnosis of middle ear effusions: a machine-learning-based approach.

Authors:  Rustin G Kashani; Marcel C Młyńczak; David Zarabanda; Paola Solis-Pazmino; David M Huland; Iram N Ahmad; Surya P Singh; Tulio A Valdez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Telemedicine and Telementoring in Rhinology, Otology, and Laryngology: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Angela Yang; Dayoung Kim; Peter H Hwang; Matt Lechner
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2022-03-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.