Literature DB >> 18581439

Economic evaluation of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence.

T C Dudding1, E Meng Lee, O Faiz, D Parés, C J Vaizey, A McGuire, M A Kamm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is an established treatment for faecal incontinence in patients who have failed conservative management. This study established the cost-effectiveness of treating patients with SNS compared with non-surgical treatment.
METHODS: A decision analysis model was performed. Data from 70 patients were obtained from medical records, bowel habit diaries and Short Form 36 quality of life questionnaires. Direct medical and non-medical costs were ascertained using the 2005/2006 national tariff, national statistics, and medication, pad and device costs. Indirect non-medical costs were also estimated.
RESULTS: Incontinence episodes were reduced from a median of 12 per fortnight at baseline to one per fortnight with SNS. Based on direct medical and non-medical costs, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for SNS was pound25 070 per QALY gained. It cost pound1038 more per year to treat patients with SNS for a median reduction of 286 incontinence episodes, equating to pound3.63 per episode reduced. When indirect non-medical costs were included the ICER was reduced to pound12 959 per QALY gained.
CONCLUSION: The ICER of pound25 070 is within the pound30 000 per QALY threshold recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence as an effective use of National Health Service resources with proper justification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18581439     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  18 in total

1.  Sacral nerve stimulation--hidden costs (uncovered).

Authors:  M Zeiton; Sara Faily; James Nicholson; Karen Telford; Abhiram Sharma
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Invited comment on Hultén et al.: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS), posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) or acupuncture for the treatment for fecal incontinence: a clinical commentary.

Authors:  E Falletto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Neuromodulation for fecal incontinence: an effective surgical intervention.

Authors:  Giuseppe Chiarioni; Olafur S Palsson; Corrado R Asteria; William E Whitehead
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Current status: new technologies for the treatment of patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Andreas M Kaiser; Guy R Orangio; Massarat Zutshi; Suraj Alva; Tracy L Hull; Peter W Marcello; David A Margolin; Janice F Rafferty; W Donald Buie; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence in Latin America: initial results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  L Oliveira; G Hagerman; M L Torres; C M Lumi; J A C Siachoque; J C Reyes; J Perez-Aguirre; J C Sanchez-Robles; V H Guerrero-Guerrero; S M Regadas; V G Filho; G Rosato; E Vieira; L Marzan; D Lima; E Londoño-Schimmer; S D Wexner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Prospective clinical audit of two neuromodulatory treatments for fecal incontinence: sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS).

Authors:  Alexander Hotouras; Jamie Murphy; Marion Allison; Anne Curry; Norman S Williams; Charles H Knowles; Christopher L Chan
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Sacral nerve stimulation versus the magnetic sphincter augmentation device for adult faecal incontinence: the SaFaRI RCT.

Authors:  David G Jayne; Annabelle E Williams; Neil Corrigan; Julie Croft; Alison Pullan; Vicky Napp; Rachel Kelly; David Meads; Armando Vargas-Palacios; Adam Martin; Claire Hulme; Steven R Brown; Karen Nugent; Jen Lodge; David Protheroe; Sushil Maslekar; Andrew Clarke; Pasha Nisar; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 4.014

8.  Sympathetic and parasympathetic regulation of rectal motility in rats.

Authors:  Timothy J Ridolfi; Wei-Dong Tong; Toku Takahashi; Lauren Kosinski; Kirk A Ludwig
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Infection Rates of Electrical Leads Used for Percutaneous Neurostimulation of the Peripheral Nervous System.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Rodney A Gabriel; Michael F Saulino; John Chae; P Hunter Peckham; Stuart A Grant; Christopher A Gilmore; Michael C Donohue; Matthew G deBock; Amorn Wongsarnpigoon; Joseph W Boggs
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.183

10.  Exhausted implanted pulse generator in sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: What next in daily practice for patients?

Authors:  Emilie Duchalais; Guillaume Meurette; Bastien Perrot; Vincent Wyart; Caroline Kubis; Paul-Antoine Lehur
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.