Literature DB >> 18581404

Detection of lymph node metastasis in cervical and uterine cancers by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.

Gigin Lin1, Kung-Chu Ho, Jiun-Jie Wang, Koon-Kwan Ng, Yau-Yau Wai, Yen-Ting Chen, Chee-Jen Chang, Shu-Hang Ng, Chyong-Huey Lai, Tzu-Chen Yen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for detection of pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical and uterine cancers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients scheduled for pelvic lymph node dissection were enrolled for 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a single-shot echo-planar DWI technique, body-phased array coil, b = 0, 1000 s/mm(2). We measured short/long-axis diameters, mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of all identifiable nodes, relative ADC values between tumors and nodes, and utilized their cutoff values to validate the diagnostic accuracy internally. Histopathologic results served as the reference standard.
RESULTS: The relative ADC values between tumor and nodes were significantly lower in metastatic than in benign nodes (0.06 vs. 0.21 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, P < 0.001; cutoff value 0.10 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s). Compared to conventional MRI, the method combining size and relative ADC values resulted in better sensitivity (25% vs. 83%) and similar specificity (98% vs. 99%). The smallest metastatic lymph node detected by this method measured 5 mm on its short axis.
CONCLUSION: The combination of size and relative ADC values was useful in detecting pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical and uterine cancers. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18581404     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  53 in total

1.  Advances in magnetic resonance imaging of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Evis Sala; Andrea Rockall; Rahel A Kubik-Huch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Indeterminate adnexal masses at ultrasound: effect of MRI imaging findings on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic decisions.

Authors:  Bianka Chilla; Nik Hauser; Gad Singer; Mafalda Trippel; Johannes M Froehlich; Rahel A Kubik-Huch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Differential diagnosis of axillary inflammatory and metastatic lymph nodes in rabbit models by using diffusion-weighted imaging: compared with conventional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Junping Wang; Qian Liao; Yunting Zhang; Chunshui Yu; Renju Bai; Haoran Sun
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Node-by-node correlation between MR and PET/CT in patients with uterine cervical cancer: diffusion-weighted imaging versus size-based criteria on T2WI.

Authors:  Eugene K Choi; Jeong Kon Kim; Hyuck Jae Choi; Seong Ho Park; Bum-Woo Park; Namkug Kim; Jae Seung Kim; Ki Chun Im; Gyunggoo Cho; Kyoung-Sik Cho
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Utility of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a parallel study of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Feng-Yuan Liu; Chyong-Huey Lai; Lan-Yan Yang; Chun-Chieh Wang; Gigin Lin; Chee-Jen Chang; Wei-Yang Chang; Shu-Hua Huang; Yu-Erh Huang; Nan-Jing Peng; Ji-Hong Hong; Angel Chao; Hung-Hsueh Chou; Yu-Chen Chang; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Role of MR Imaging and FDG PET/CT in Selection and Follow-up of Patients Treated with Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecologic Malignancies.

Authors:  Yulia Lakhman; Stephanie Nougaret; Maura Miccò; Chiara Scelzo; Hebert A Vargas; Ramon E Sosa; Elizabeth J Sutton; Dennis S Chi; Hedvig Hricak; Evis Sala
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Value of diffusion-weighted imaging to detect small malignant pelvic lymph nodes at 3 T.

Authors:  Catherine Roy; Guillaume Bierry; Andrea Matau; Gauthier Bazille; Rémy Pasquali
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Defining the role of modern imaging techniques in assessing lymph nodes for metastasis in cancer: evolving contribution of PET in this setting.

Authors:  Thomas C Kwee; Sandip Basu; Drew A Torigian; Babak Saboury; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer: a multi-modality, morphologic and functional imaging study.

Authors:  Jinman Zhong; Weiwei Zhao; Fang Ren; Shun Qi; Xifu Wang; Tianchu Lv; Zhanliang Su; Hong Yin; Jing Ren; Yi Huan
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance lymphography in gynaecological malignancies.

Authors:  Noor Jahan; Priya Narayanan; Andrea Rockall
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.