Literature DB >> 18581344

MRI phase contrast velocity and flow errors in turbulent stenotic jets.

Kieran R O'Brien1, Brett R Cowan, Manali Jain, Ralph A H Stewart, Andrew J Kerr, Alistair A Young.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To clarify the use of MRI phase contrast (PC), as an alternative to Doppler echocardiography, when measuring high-velocity turbulent jets associated with stenotic valvular disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vivo PC aortic stroke volume (SV) was compared with ventricular SV in 31 patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis (AS). Two in vitro pipe experiments were conducted to evaluate errors in steady stenotic and nonstenotic turbulent flows.
RESULTS: The average in vivo error in SV was -24% in the left-ventricular (LV) outflow tract (LVOT) and -41% in the aortic root. Errors were most prominent in patients with the highest Doppler peak velocities. In vitro nonstenotic flow experiments showed accurate flow measurement with an average error of 1.8%. Significant errors were found in the in vitro stenotic flow, which reduced with shorter echo times (TE): average error -166/-67/-25/-13/-8.8% for TEs of 4.8/4.0/3.3/2.2/2.0 msec. In both the in vivo and in vitro stenotic experiments the errors were associated with signal loss in the flow-compensated magnitude image.
CONCLUSION: Signal loss is associated with flow errors in stenotic jets. Current clinically available PC pulse sequences with TE >2 msec may not accurately quantify flow for severe lesions. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18581344     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  38 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac imaging in valvular heart disease.

Authors:  W S Choo; R P Steeds
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  In vivo evaluation of quantitative MR angiography in a canine carotid artery stenosis model.

Authors:  M Calderon-Arnulphi; S Amin-Hanjani; A Alaraj; M Zhao; X Du; S Ruland; X J Zhou; K R Thulborn; F T Charbel
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Four-dimensional flow MRI for evaluation of post-stenotic turbulent flow in a phantom: comparison with flowmeter and computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Jihoon Kweon; Dong Hyun Yang; Guk Bae Kim; Namkug Kim; MunYoung Paek; Aurelien F Stalder; Andreas Greiser; Young-Hak Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Real-time phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of haemodynamics: from phantom to patients.

Authors:  Julius Traber; Lennart Wurche; Matthias A Dieringer; Wolfgang Utz; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Andreas Greiser; Ning Jin; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Volumetric velocity measurements in restricted geometries using spiral sampling: a phantom study.

Authors:  Anders Nilsson; Johan Revstedt; Einar Heiberg; Freddy Ståhlberg; Karin Markenroth Bloch
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  The effect of reducing spatial resolution by in-plane partial volume averaging on peak velocity measurements in phase contrast magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Jonathan Rodrigues; Kishore Minhas; Guido Pieles; Elisa McAlindon; Christopher Occleshaw; Nathan Manghat; Mark Hamilton
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-10

7.  Cardiac-gated intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the investigation of intracranial cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in the lateral ventricle: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Eddie Surer; Cristina Rossi; Anton S Becker; Tim Finkenstaedt; Moritz C Wurnig; Antonios Valavanis; Sebastian Winklhofer
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Optimization methods for magnetic resonance imaging gradient waveform design.

Authors:  Matthew J Middione; Michael Loecher; Kévin Moulin; Daniel B Ennis
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 9.  Imaging of patients with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Arno A W Roest; Albert de Roos
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  4D spiral imaging of flows in stenotic phantoms and subjects with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  M J Negahdar; Mo Kadbi; Michael Kendrick; Marcus F Stoddard; Amir A Amini
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.