OBJECTIVES: Chronic disease prevalence and burden is growing, as is the need for applicable large community-based clinical trials of potential interventions. To support the development of clinical trial management systems for such trials, a community-based primary care research information model is needed. We analyzed the requirements of trials in this environment, and constructed an information model to drive development of systems supporting trial design, execution, and analysis. We anticipate that this model will contribute to a deeper understanding of all the dimensions of clinical research and that it will be integrated with other clinical research modeling efforts, such as the Biomedical Research Integrated Domain Group (BRIDG) model, to complement and expand on current domain models. DESIGN: We used unified modeling language modeling to develop use cases, activity diagrams, and a class (object) model to capture components of research in this setting. The initial primary care research object model (PCROM) scope was the performance of a randomized clinical trial (RCT). It was validated by domain experts worldwide, and underwent a detailed comparison with the BRIDG clinical research reference model. RESULTS: We present a class diagram and associated definitions that capture the components of a primary care RCT. Forty-five percent of PCROM objects were mapped to BRIDG, 37% differed in class and/or subclass assignment, and 18% did not map. CONCLUSION: The PCROM represents an important link between existing research reference models and the real-world design and implementation of systems for managing practice-based primary care clinical trials. Although the high degree of correspondence between PCROM and existing research reference models provides evidence for validity and comprehensiveness, existing models require object extensions and modifications to serve primary care research.
OBJECTIVES:Chronic disease prevalence and burden is growing, as is the need for applicable large community-based clinical trials of potential interventions. To support the development of clinical trial management systems for such trials, a community-based primary care research information model is needed. We analyzed the requirements of trials in this environment, and constructed an information model to drive development of systems supporting trial design, execution, and analysis. We anticipate that this model will contribute to a deeper understanding of all the dimensions of clinical research and that it will be integrated with other clinical research modeling efforts, such as the Biomedical Research Integrated Domain Group (BRIDG) model, to complement and expand on current domain models. DESIGN: We used unified modeling language modeling to develop use cases, activity diagrams, and a class (object) model to capture components of research in this setting. The initial primary care research object model (PCROM) scope was the performance of a randomized clinical trial (RCT). It was validated by domain experts worldwide, and underwent a detailed comparison with the BRIDG clinical research reference model. RESULTS: We present a class diagram and associated definitions that capture the components of a primary care RCT. Forty-five percent of PCROM objects were mapped to BRIDG, 37% differed in class and/or subclass assignment, and 18% did not map. CONCLUSION: The PCROM represents an important link between existing research reference models and the real-world design and implementation of systems for managing practice-based primary care clinical trials. Although the high degree of correspondence between PCROM and existing research reference models provides evidence for validity and comprehensiveness, existing models require object extensions and modifications to serve primary care research.
Authors: Christine Laine; Richard Horton; Catherine D DeAngelis; Jeffrey M Drazen; Frank A Frizelle; Fiona Godlee; Charlotte Haug; Paul C Hébert; Sheldon Kotzin; Ana Marusic; Peush Sahni; Torben V Schroeder; Harold C Sox; Martin B Van der Weyden; Freek W A Verheugt Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-06-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lesley Wood; Matthias Egger; Lise Lotte Gluud; Kenneth F Schulz; Peter Jüni; Douglas G Altman; Christian Gluud; Richard M Martin; Anthony J G Wood; Jonathan A C Sterne Journal: BMJ Date: 2008-03-03
Authors: Janet M Warren; Rebecca K Golley; Clare E Collins; Anthony D Okely; Rachel A Jones; Philip J Morgan; Rebecca A Perry; Louise A Baur; Julie R Steele; Anthea M Magarey Journal: Int J Pediatr Obes Date: 2007
Authors: Connie Kingry; Arnaud Bastien; Gillian Booth; Therese S Geraci; Brenda R Kirpach; Laura C Lovato; Karen L Margolis; Yves Rosenberg; JoAnne M Sperl-Hillen; Laura Vargo; Jeff D Williamson; Jeffrey L Probstfield Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2007-04-12 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: George A Komatsoulis; Denise B Warzel; Francis W Hartel; Krishnakant Shanbhag; Ram Chilukuri; Gilberto Fragoso; Sherri de Coronado; Dianne M Reeves; Jillaine B Hadfield; Christophe Ludet; Peter A Covitz Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2007-04-02 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Alison M McDonald; Rosemary C Knight; Marion K Campbell; Vikki A Entwistle; Adrian M Grant; Jonathan A Cook; Diana R Elbourne; David Francis; Jo Garcia; Ian Roberts; Claire Snowdon Journal: Trials Date: 2006-04-07 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Brendan C Delaney; Kevin A Peterson; Stuart Speedie; Adel Taweel; Theodoros N Arvanitis; F D Richard Hobbs Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2012 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Kevin A Peterson; Brendan C Delaney; Theodoros N Arvanitis; Adel Taweel; Elisabeth A Sandberg; Stuart Speedie; F D Richard Hobbs Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2012 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Wolfgang Kuchinke; Töresin Karakoyun; Christian Ohmann; Theodoros N Arvanitis; Adel Taweel; Brendan C Delaney; Stuart M Speedie Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 2.796