Literature DB >> 17599427

Recruitment strategies in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial.

Connie Kingry1, Arnaud Bastien, Gillian Booth, Therese S Geraci, Brenda R Kirpach, Laura C Lovato, Karen L Margolis, Yves Rosenberg, JoAnne M Sperl-Hillen, Laura Vargo, Jeff D Williamson, Jeffrey L Probstfield.   

Abstract

The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial is a randomized, multicenter clinical trial using a double 2 x 2 factorial design in 10,251 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. ACCORD is testing 3 complementary medical treatment strategies that may reduce high rates of major CVD morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. The ACCORD vanguard phase, conducted at 59 clinics in the United States and Canada, recruited 1,174 participants in 20 weeks from January through June 1, 2001, with a recruitment efficiency (R-factor) of 0.65. The recruitment strategies used in this vanguard phase were almost exclusively chart and database review within clinical practices and institutions. Recruitment for the main trial began in February 2003, involved 77 clinics, and resulted in an additional 9,077 participants by October 29, 2005 (total, 10,251). The R-factor during main trial recruitment was 0.96. Although new and refined recruitment strategies were formulated from the vanguard experience, the most powerful determinant of improved recruitment efficiency was the immediate start of enrollment by most clinics at the beginning of the main trial. Recruitment in the main trial required only a brief extension of 3 months and facilitated the nearly complete capture of the expected number of person-years of observation. Described herein are vanguard and main trial recruitment activities, including strategy implementation, screening procedures, randomization results, problems encountered, and lessons learned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17599427     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  19 in total

1.  Recruitment strategies and challenges in a large intervention trial: Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.

Authors:  Thomas M Ramsey; Joni K Snyder; Laura C Lovato; Christianne L Roumie; Steven P Glasser; Nora M Cosgrove; Christine M Olney; Rocky H Tang; Karen C Johnson; Carolyn H Still; Lisa H Gren; Jeffery C Childs; Osa L Crago; John H Summerson; Sandy M Walsh; Letitia H Perdue; Denise M Bankowski; David C Goff
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  The Primary Care Research Object Model (PCROM): a computable information model for practice-based primary care research.

Authors:  Stuart M Speedie; Adel Taweel; Ida Sim; Theodoros N Arvanitis; Brendan Delaney; Kevin A Peterson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Psychological and Biological Pathways Linking Perceived Neighborhood Characteristics and Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Diana A Chirinos; Luz M Garcini; Annina Seiler; Kyle W Murdock; Kristen Peek; Raymond P Stowe; Christopher Fagundes
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2019-08-16

4.  Therapeutic hypothermia after pediatric cardiac arrest trials: the vanguard phase experience and implications for other trials.

Authors:  Victoria L Pemberton; Brittan Browning; Angie Webster; J Michael Dean; Frank W Moler
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.624

Review 5.  Glucose targets for preventing diabetic kidney disease and its progression.

Authors:  Marinella Ruospo; Valeria M Saglimbene; Suetonia C Palmer; Salvatore De Cosmo; Antonio Pacilli; Olga Lamacchia; Mauro Cignarelli; Paola Fioretto; Mariacristina Vecchio; Jonathan C Craig; Giovanni Fm Strippoli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-08

6.  Lifestyle interventions and independence for elders study: recruitment and baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Anthony P Marsh; Laura C Lovato; Nancy W Glynn; Kimberly Kennedy; Cynthia Castro; Kathryn Domanchuk; Erica McDavitt; Ruben Rodate; Michael Marsiske; Joanne McGloin; Erik J Groessl; Marco Pahor; Jack M Guralnik
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Hertzel C Gerstein; Michael E Miller; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; J Thomas Bigger; John B Buse; William C Cushman; Saul Genuth; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Denise G Simons-Morton; William T Friedewald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Constructing common cohorts from trials with overlapping eligibility criteria: implications for comparing effect sizes between trials.

Authors:  David L Mount; Patricia Feeney; Anthony N Fabricatore; Mace Coday; Judy Bahnson; Robert Byington; Suzanne Phelan; Sharon Wilmoth; William C Knowler; Irene Hramiak; Kwame Osei; Mary Ellen Sweeney; Mark A Espeland
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Paradox of using intensive lowering of blood glucose in diabetics and strategies to overcome it and decrease cardiovascular risks.

Authors:  Xian-pei Heng; Liu-qing Yang; Min-ling Chen; Liang Li; Su-ping Huang; Ying Lei
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 1.978

10.  Lifestyle modification and weight reduction among low-income patients with the metabolic syndrome: the CHARMS randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Diana A Chirinos; Ronald B Goldberg; Maria M Llabre; Marc Gellman; Miriam Gutt; Judith McCalla; Armando Mendez; Neil Schneiderman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.