Literature DB >> 18579565

Computational design of synthetic gene circuits with composable parts.

M A Marchisio1, J Stelling.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: In principle, novel genetic circuits can be engineered using standard parts with well-understood functionalities. However, no model based on the simple composition of these parts has become a standard, mainly because it is difficult to define signal exchanges between biological units as unambiguously as in electrical engineering. Corresponding concepts and computational tools for easy circuit design in biology are missing.
RESULTS: Taking inspiration from (and slightly modifying) ideas in the 'MIT Registry of Standard Biological Parts', we developed a method for the design of genetic circuits with composable parts. Gene expression requires four kinds of signal carriers: RNA polymerases, ribosomes, transcription factors and environmental 'messages' (inducers or corepressors). The flux of each of these types of molecules is a quantifiable biological signal exchanged between parts. Here, each part is modeled independently by the ordinary differential equations (ODE) formalism and integrated into the software ProMoT (Process Modeling Tool). In this way, we realized a 'drag and drop' tool, where genetic circuits are built just by placing biological parts on a canvas and by connecting them through 'wires' that enable flow of signal carriers, as it happens in electrical engineering. Our simulations of well-known synthetic circuits agree well with published computational and experimental results. AVAILABILITY: The code is available on request from the authors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18579565     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  37 in total

1.  SynBioSS designer: a web-based tool for the automated generation of kinetic models for synthetic biological constructs.

Authors:  Emma Weeding; Jason Houle; Yiannis N Kaznessis
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 2.  Genetic design automation: engineering fantasy or scientific renewal?

Authors:  Matthew W Lux; Brian W Bramlett; David A Ball; Jean Peccoud
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 3.  Towards the engineering of in vitro systems.

Authors:  Christoph Hold; Sven Panke
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Designing and encoding models for synthetic biology.

Authors:  Lukas Endler; Nicolas Rodriguez; Nick Juty; Vijayalakshmi Chelliah; Camille Laibe; Chen Li; Nicolas Le Novère
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Towards programming languages for genetic engineering of living cells.

Authors:  Michael Pedersen; Andrew Phillips
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Piecing together a puzzle. An exposition of synthetic biology.

Authors:  Anna Deplazes
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  Antimony: a modular model definition language.

Authors:  Lucian P Smith; Frank T Bergmann; Deepak Chandran; Herbert M Sauro
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 8.  Mechanisms and evolution of control logic in prokaryotic transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Sacha A F T van Hijum; Marnix H Medema; Oscar P Kuipers
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 9.  The challenges of informatics in synthetic biology: from biomolecular networks to artificial organisms.

Authors:  Gil Alterovitz; Taro Muso; Marco F Ramoni
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 11.622

10.  Computer-aided design of biological circuits using TinkerCell.

Authors:  Deepak Chandran; Frank T Bergmann; Herbert M Sauro
Journal:  Bioeng Bugs       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.