| Literature DB >> 18578874 |
Wenchuan Leng1, Tao Liu, Rui Li, Jian Yang, Candong Wei, Wenliang Zhang, Qi Jin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Trichophyton rubrum is the most common dermatophyte causing fungal skin infections in humans. Asexual sporulation is an important means of propagation for T. rubrum, and conidia produced by this way are thought to be the primary cause of human infections. Despite their importance in pathogenesis, the conidia of T. rubrum remain understudied. We intend to intensively investigate the proteome of dormant T. rubrum conidia to characterize its molecular and cellular features and to enhance the development of novel therapeutic strategies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18578874 PMCID: PMC2443143 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1The numbers of identified protein from different enzymatic digestion and sample prefractionation. (A) Red circle represents the proteins identified by tryptic digestion and black circle indicates the proteins identified by proteinase K digestion. (B) The contribution of sample prefractionation to the identification of proteins digested by trypsin. Black circle represents the identified proteins from fraction of molecular weight less than 30 kDa. Pink circle represents the identified proteins from fraction of molecular weight between 30 and 50 kDa. Blue circle represents the identified proteins from fraction of molecular weight more than 50 kDa. (C) The contribution of sample prefractionation to identification of proteins digested by proteinase K. Black circle represents the identified proteins from fraction of molecular weight less than 30 kDa. Pink circle represents the identified proteins from fraction of molecular weight between 30 and 50 kDa. Blue circle represents the identified proteins from fraction of molecular weight more than 50 kDa. (D) The overlapping of identified proteins between duplicate analyses. Red circle represents the proteins identified by analysis 1 and black circle indicates the proteins identified by analysis 2.
Figure 2Gene Ontology (GO) cellular component annotation for identified proteins. The GO cellular component categories are shown as a pie-chart, and the numbers in parentheses represent the proteins included in each term. The figure was produced using Blast2GO.
Functional classification of identified proteins in T. rubrum conidia based on the KOG database
| Functional Classification | Numbers of ID | Percents in Total |
| Information storage and processing | ||
| Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis | 101 | 9.8% |
| RNA processing and modification | 30 | 2.9% |
| Transcription | 20 | 1.9% |
| DNA replication, recombination and repair | 7 | 0.68% |
| Chromatin structure and dynamics | 30 | 2.9% |
| Cellular Processes and Signalling | ||
| Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning | 7 | 0.68% |
| Defence mechanisms | 1 | 0.1% |
| Signal transduction mechanisms | 22 | 2.1% |
| Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis | 7 | 0.68% |
| Cytoskeleton | 16 | 1.6% |
| Extracellular structures | 4 | 0.38% |
| Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport | 20 | 1.9% |
| Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones | 71 | 6.9% |
| Metabolism | ||
| Energy production and conversion | 71 | 6.9% |
| Carbohydrate transport and metabolism | 43 | 4.2% |
| Amino acid transport and metabolism | 45 | 4.4% |
| Nucleotide transport and Metabolism | 12 | 1.2% |
| Coenzyme transport and Metabolism | 12 | 1.2% |
| Lipid transport and metabolism | 21 | 2.1% |
| Inorganic ion transport and Metabolism | 21 | 2.1% |
| Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism | 15 | 1.5% |
| Poorly characterized | ||
| General function prediction only | 69 | 6.7% |
| Function unKnown | 19 | 1.9% |
| Anonymous NO related KOG | 381 | 37.1% |
| Total | 1026 | |
ID indicates all proteins identified in our experiments.