Fiona Jones1, Cecily Partridge, Fiona Reid. 1. Faculty of Health and Social Care, St George's University of London, London, UK. fjones@hscs.sgul.ac.uk
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim was to develop a questionnaire for use by practitioners working in stroke care to measure self-efficacy judgements in specific domains of functioning relevant to individuals following stroke. BACKGROUND: The prevalence of stroke is set to rise across the developed world especially amongst the elderly population. Recovery and adjustment in the longer term can be affected by many different factors. Current objective measures of functional performance used in many stroke programmes may not fully explain the extent of personal levels of confidence that could ultimately influence outcome. METHODS: Three separate studies were conducted to develop the Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. A total of 112 stroke survivors, between 2 and 24 weeks, poststroke participated in the study. Development of the scale was undertaken between 2004 and 2006. RESULTS: The final 13-item Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire was found to have good face validity and feasibility to use in the recovery period following stroke. Cronbach Alpha was 0.90 suggesting good internal consistency, and criterion validity was high compared with the Falls Efficacy Scale, r = 0.803, p < 0.001. The Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire was also able to discriminate between those participants walking and not walking. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary psychometric testing of the new Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire has indicated that it is a valid measure of confidence for functional performance and aspects of self-management relevant for individuals recovering from stroke. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire could assist clinicians and researchers working in acute stroke care and rehabilitation to screen levels of confidence of stroke survivors in relation to functional performance and self-management. The Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire could be used as part of battery of stroke outcome measures to provide a more comprehensive overview of factors influencing performance in the individuals recovering from a stroke.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim was to develop a questionnaire for use by practitioners working in stroke care to measure self-efficacy judgements in specific domains of functioning relevant to individuals following stroke. BACKGROUND: The prevalence of stroke is set to rise across the developed world especially amongst the elderly population. Recovery and adjustment in the longer term can be affected by many different factors. Current objective measures of functional performance used in many stroke programmes may not fully explain the extent of personal levels of confidence that could ultimately influence outcome. METHODS: Three separate studies were conducted to develop the Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. A total of 112 stroke survivors, between 2 and 24 weeks, poststroke participated in the study. Development of the scale was undertaken between 2004 and 2006. RESULTS: The final 13-item Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire was found to have good face validity and feasibility to use in the recovery period following stroke. Cronbach Alpha was 0.90 suggesting good internal consistency, and criterion validity was high compared with the Falls Efficacy Scale, r = 0.803, p < 0.001. The Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire was also able to discriminate between those participants walking and not walking. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary psychometric testing of the new Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire has indicated that it is a valid measure of confidence for functional performance and aspects of self-management relevant for individuals recovering from stroke. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire could assist clinicians and researchers working in acute stroke care and rehabilitation to screen levels of confidence of stroke survivors in relation to functional performance and self-management. The Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire could be used as part of battery of stroke outcome measures to provide a more comprehensive overview of factors influencing performance in the individuals recovering from a stroke.
Authors: Thomas V Merluzzi; James E Pustejovsky; Errol J Philip; Stephanie J Sohl; Mark Berendsen; John M Salsman Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2019-07-09 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Anna Palumbo; Viswanath Aluru; Jessica Battaglia; Daniel Geller; Alan Turry; Marc Ross; Adrian Cristian; Caitlin Balagula; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Latika Khatri; Moses V Chao; Robert C Froemke; Jacek K Urbanek; Preeti Raghavan Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2021-12-06 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Lucy Dodakian; Alison L McKenzie; Vu Le; Jill See; Kristin Pearson-Fuhrhop; Erin Burke Quinlan; Robert J Zhou; Renee Augsberger; Xuan A Tran; Nizan Friedman; David J Reinkensmeyer; Steven C Cramer Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Ickpyo Hong; Craig A Velozo; Chih-Ying Li; Sergio Romero; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Lisa M Shulman Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2016-04-05 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Nicola Saywell; Alain C Vandal; Paul Brown; H Carl Hanger; Leigh Hale; Suzie Mudge; Stephan Milosavljevic; Valery Feigin; Denise Taylor Journal: Trials Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 2.279