Literature DB >> 31436612

Belief, Confidence, and Motivation to Use the Paretic Upper Limb in Daily Life Over the First 24 Weeks After Stroke.

Kimberly J Waddell1, Rachel G Tabak, Michael J Strube, Debra Haire-Joshu, Catherine E Lang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The recovery patterns of upper limb (UL) impairment after stroke are established. Psychosocial factors such as belief that paretic UL recovery is possible, confidence, and motivation to use the paretic UL in everyday tasks are unexplored early after stroke. The purpose of this exploratory study was to characterize belief, confidence, and motivation to use the paretic UL in daily life, and self-perceived barriers to UL recovery over the first 24 weeks after stroke.
METHODS: This was a longitudinal cohort study (N = 30) with 8 assessment sessions over the first 24 weeks after stroke. Belief, confidence, and motivation to use the paretic UL and self-perceived barriers were quantified via survey and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Change in the number of self-perceived barriers between weeks 2 and 24 was tested using a paired-samples t test. The relationship between UL capacity, depressive symptomatology, cognition, and each psychosocial factor was examined using Spearman rank-order correlation analyses.
RESULTS: Twenty-two participants completed all study assessments. Belief, confidence, and motivation were high across the 24 weeks, with little variation. There was no difference between the average number of barriers from weeks 2 to 24. There was no relationship between the clinical measures and psychosocial factors at week 2, 12, or 24. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: High levels of belief, confidence, and motivation appear consistent over the first 6 months after stroke. The lack of correlations between psychosocial factors and clinical measures suggests belief, confidence, and motivation may not be vulnerable to functional status early after stroke.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1 available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A283).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31436612      PMCID: PMC6744298          DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther        ISSN: 1557-0576            Impact factor:   4.655


  46 in total

1.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.

Authors:  R M Ryan; E L Deci
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2000-01

2.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Ziad S Nasreddine; Natalie A Phillips; Valérie Bédirian; Simon Charbonneau; Victor Whitehead; Isabelle Collin; Jeffrey L Cummings; Howard Chertkow
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  The effect of a task-oriented walking intervention on improving balance self-efficacy poststroke: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Nancy M Salbach; Nancy E Mayo; Sylvie Robichaud-Ekstrand; James A Hanley; Carol L Richards; Sharon Wood-Dauphinee
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke.

Authors:  J H Van der Lee; V De Groot; H Beckerman; R C Wagenaar; G J Lankhorst; L M Bouter
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Qualitative analysis of stroke patients' motivation for rehabilitation.

Authors:  N Maclean; P Pound; C Wolfe; A Rudd
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-28

6.  Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  Patients' expectations of recovery following stroke: a qualitative study.

Authors:  R Wiles; Ann Ashburn; S Payne; C Murphy
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2002-11-10       Impact factor: 3.033

8.  Defining post-stroke recovery: implications for design and interpretation of drug trials.

Authors:  P W Duncan; S M Lai; J Keighley
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2000-03-03       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  Self-care self-efficacy, quality of life, and depression after stroke.

Authors:  G Robinson-Smith; M V Johnston; J Allen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  The unfolding illness trajectory of stroke.

Authors:  M Kirkevold
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 3.033

View more
  4 in total

1.  Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Improves Over the First 12 Weeks Poststroke.

Authors:  Kimberly J Waddell; Michael J Strube; Rachel G Tabak; Debra Haire-Joshu; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 4.895

2.  Sensor-based categorization of upper limb performance in daily life of persons with and without neurological upper limb deficits.

Authors:  Jessica Barth; Keith R Lohse; Jeffrey D Konrad; Marghuertta D Bland; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-10-20

3.  Perceived Facilitators and Barriers for Actual Arm Use during Everyday Activities in Community Dwelling Individuals with Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Grace J Kim; Shir Lebovich; Debbie Rand
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Relationship Between Body-Specific Attention to a Paretic Limb and Real-World Arm Use in Stroke Patients: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Ryoji Otaki; Yutaka Oouchida; Naoki Aizu; Tamami Sudo; Hiroshi Sasahara; Yuki Saito; Sunao Takemura; Shin-Ichi Izumi
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.