Literature DB >> 18577809

Effects of hospital volume of primary percutaneous coronary interventions on angiographic results and in-hospital outcomes for acute myocardial infarction.

Jun Shiraishi1, Yoshio Kohno, Takahisa Sawada, Masayasu Arihara, Masayuki Hyogo, Takakazu Yagi, Takatomo Shima, Takashi Okada, Takeshi Nakamura, Satoaki Matoba, Hiroyuki Yamada, Takeshi Shirayama, Tetsuya Tatsumi, Makoto Kitamura, Keizo Furukawa, Hiroaki Matsubara.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several clinical studies have demonstrated an inverse relationship between hospital volume of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and in-hospital mortality. However, the relationships among hospital primary PCI volume, angiographic results, and in-hospital prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have not been fully investigated in Japan. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Using the AMI-Kyoto Multi-Center Risk Study database between January 2000 and December 2005, hospitals were classified into quintiles based on their annual volume of primary PCI. The fifth quintile of hospitals was labeled as high-volume, and the other quintiles were combined and defined as low-volume. Although patients undergoing primary PCI in high-volume hospitals (high-volume group, n=764) had a larger number of diseased vessels at initial coronary angiography and lower Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade in the infarct-related artery before PCI, compared with those in low-volume hospitals (low-volume group, n=1,021), the rates of achieving TIMI flow grade 3 just after PCI in the high-volume group was significantly higher than that in the low-volume group. The overall in-hospital mortality did not differ between the 2 groups. On multivariate analysis, in AMI patients undergoing primary PCI, Killip class >or=3 at admission, multivessel disease or left main trunk (LMT) as culprit lesion, number of diseased vessels >or=2 or diseased LMT, and age were the independent positive predictors of in-hospital mortality, whereas the TIMI flow grade 3 after primary PCI and elapsed time <24 h were the negative ones, but not low-volume hospital.
CONCLUSIONS: Angiographic results of primary PCI in high-volume hospitals were superior to those in low-volume hospitals, but there was no significant difference in the in-hospital mortality between AMI patients in high-volume hospitals and those in low-volume hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18577809     DOI: 10.1253/circj.72.1041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  4 in total

1.  Regional impact of cardiac arrest center criteria on out-of-hospital transportation practices.

Authors:  Christian Martin-Gill; Christopher P Dilger; Francis X Guyette; Jon C Rittenberger; Clifton W Callaway
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 3.077

2.  The relationship between procedural volume and patient outcomes for percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patricia Harrington; Máirín Ryan; Kieran A Walsh; Thomas Plunkett; Kirsty K O'Brien; Conor Teljeur; Susan M Smith
Journal:  HRB Open Res       Date:  2021-01-28

Review 3.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Hospital Volume and the Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Xiaojun Lin; Hongbing Tao; Miao Cai; Aihua Liao; Zhaohui Cheng; Haifeng Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Differences of in-hospital outcomes within patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention at institutions with high versus low procedural volume: a report from the Japanese multicentre percutaneous coronary intervention registry.

Authors:  Masaki Kodaira; Toshiki Kuno; Yohei Numasawa; Takahiro Ohki; Iwao Nakamura; Ikuko Ueda; Keiichi Fukuda; Shun Kohsaka
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2018-07-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.