Literature DB >> 18577806

A case study of evolutionary computation of biochemical adaptation.

Paul François1, Eric D Siggia.   

Abstract

Simulations of evolution have a long history, but their relation to biology is questioned because of the perceived contingency of evolution. Here we provide an example of a biological process, adaptation, where simulations are argued to approach closer to biology. Adaptation is a common feature of sensory systems, and a plausible component of other biochemical networks because it rescales upstream signals to facilitate downstream processing. We create random gene networks numerically, by linking genes with interactions that model transcription, phosphorylation and protein-protein association. We define a fitness function for adaptation in terms of two functional metrics, and show that any reasonable combination of them will yield the same adaptive networks after repeated rounds of mutation and selection. Convergence to these networks is driven by positive selection and thus fast. There is always a path in parameter space of continuously improving fitness that leads to perfect adaptation, implying that the actual mutation rates we use in the simulation do not bias the results. Our results imply a kinetic view of evolution, i.e., it favors gene networks that can be learned quickly from the random examples supplied by mutation. This formulation allows for deductive predictions of the networks realized in nature.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18577806     DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/5/2/026009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Biol        ISSN: 1478-3967            Impact factor:   2.583


  30 in total

1.  Pareto evolution of gene networks: an algorithm to optimize multiple fitness objectives.

Authors:  Aryeh Warmflash; Paul Francois; Eric D Siggia
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Open cascades as simple solutions to providing ultrasensitivity and adaptation in cellular signaling.

Authors:  Jeyaraman Srividhya; Yongfeng Li; Joseph R Pomerening
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Criticality and Adaptivity in Enzymatic Networks.

Authors:  Paul J Steiner; Ruth J Williams; Jeff Hasty; Lev S Tsimring
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Untangling the Hairball: Fitness-Based Asymptotic Reduction of Biological Networks.

Authors:  Félix Proulx-Giraldeau; Thomas J Rademaker; Paul François
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Sharing of Phosphatases Promotes Response Plasticity in Phosphorylation Cascades.

Authors:  Bhaswar Ghosh; Uddipan Sarma; Victor Sourjik; Stefan Legewie
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  BioJazz: in silico evolution of cellular networks with unbounded complexity using rule-based modeling.

Authors:  Song Feng; Julien F Ollivier; Peter S Swain; Orkun S Soyer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Evolutionary Design of Gene Networks: Forced Evolution by Genomic Parasites.

Authors:  A V Spirov; E A Zagriychuk; D M Holloway
Journal:  Parallel Process Lett       Date:  2014-06

8.  Defining network topologies that can achieve biochemical adaptation.

Authors:  Wenzhe Ma; Ala Trusina; Hana El-Samad; Wendell A Lim; Chao Tang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  Design principles of regulatory networks: searching for the molecular algorithms of the cell.

Authors:  Wendell A Lim; Connie M Lee; Chao Tang
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 10.  Using evolutionary computations to understand the design and evolution of gene and cell regulatory networks.

Authors:  Alexander Spirov; David Holloway
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.608

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.