| Literature DB >> 18577220 |
Ralph M Garruto1, Chris Reiber, Marta P Alfonso, Heidi Gastrich, Kelsey Needham, Sarah Sunderman, Sarah Walker, Jennifer Weeks, Nicholas Derosa, Eric Faisst, John Dunn, Kenneth Fanelli, Kenneth Shilkret.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The emergence and continuing spread of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) in cervids has now reached 14 U.S. states, two Canadian provinces, and South Korea, producing a potential for transmission of CWD prions to humans and other animals globally. In 2005, CWD spread for the first time from the Midwest to more densely populated regions of the East Coast. As a result, a large cohort of individuals attending a wild game feast in upstate New York were exposed to a deer that was subsequently confirmed positive for CWD.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18577220 PMCID: PMC2453121 DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-7-31
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health ISSN: 1476-069X Impact factor: 5.984
Figure 1Spatial distribution of CWD in the United States and Canada. The CWD map is overlaid on a demographic map of the U.S. population. The insert map of New York State shows the Department of Environmental Conservation CWD Containment Area where the outbreak of CWD occurred. This depiction combines and updates information based on maps and data from the USGS National Wildlife Health Center [38], and census data from the US Census Bureau's interactive online mapping program for 2006 Population Estimates (US Census Bureau; 2006 Population Estimates; generated by Chris Reiber; using American FactFinder [39].).
Figure 2Examination of and specimen preparation from a whitetail deer. The check station where the deer are examined is located in the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation CWD Containment Area in Oneida County.
Figure 3Percent of participants (N = 81) affected by each Feast Risk factor.
Number of risk factors for study participants (N = 81).
| Risk category | # risk factors | n | cum n | % | cum % |
| Feast Risk | 0 | 8 | 8 | 9.9 | 9.9 |
| 1 | 56 | 64 | 69.1 | 79 | |
| 2 | 6 | 70 | 7.4 | 86.4 | |
| 3 | 4 | 74 | 4.9 | 91.4 | |
| 4 | 1 | 75 | 1.2 | 92.6 | |
| 5 | 0 | 75 | 0 | 92.6 | |
| 6 | 4 | 79 | 4.9 | 97.6 | |
| 7 | 2 | 81 | 2.5 | 100 | |
| General Risk | 0 | 19 | 19 | 23.5 | 23.5 |
| 1 | 6 | 25 | 7.4 | 30.9 | |
| 2 | 2 | 27 | 2.5 | 33.4 | |
| 3 | 7 | 34 | 8.6 | 42 | |
| 4 | 9 | 43 | 11.1 | 53.1 | |
| 5 | 15 | 58 | 18.5 | 71.6 | |
| 6 | 13 | 71 | 16 | 87.7 | |
| 7 | 10 | 81 | 12.3 | 100 |
Figure 4Percent of participants (N = 81) consuming various types of venison preparations at the sportsman's feast.
Figure 5Percent of participants (N = 81) affected by each General Risk factor.