Literature DB >> 18576248

A plea for pragmatism in clinical research ethics.

David H Brendel1, Franklin G Miller.   

Abstract

Pragmatism is a distinctive approach to clinical research ethics that can guide bioethicists and members of institutional review boards (IRBs) as they struggle to balance the competing values of promoting medical research and protecting human subjects participating in it. After defining our understanding of pragmatism in the setting of clinical research ethics, we show how a pragmatic approach can provide guidance not only for the day-to-day functioning of the IRB, but also for evaluation of policy standards, such as the one that addresses acceptable risks for healthy children in clinical research trials. We also show how pragmatic considerations might influence the debate about the use of deception in clinical research. Finally, we show how a pragmatic approach, by regarding the promotion of human research and the protection of human subjects as equally important values, helps to break down the false dichotomy between science and ethics in clinical research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18576248     DOI: 10.1080/15265160802166025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  7 in total

1.  Real pragmatism, kids, and the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA).

Authors:  Alexander A Kon
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  Instrumentalist analyses of the functions of ethics concept-principles: a proposal for synergetic empirical and conceptual enrichment.

Authors:  Eric Racine; M Ariel Cascio; Marjorie Montreuil; Aline Bogossian
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2019-08

3.  Enhancing informed consent in clinical trials and exploring resistances to disclosing adverse clinical trial results.

Authors:  John D Banja; Boadie Dunlop
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  A renewed, ethical defense of placebo-controlled trials of new treatments for major depression and anxiety disorders.

Authors:  B W Dunlop; J Banja
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Recommendations and evidence for reporting items in pediatric clinical trial protocols and reports: two systematic reviews.

Authors:  April V P Clyburne-Sherin; Pravheen Thurairajah; Mufiza Z Kapadia; Margaret Sampson; Winnie W Y Chan; Martin Offringa
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Deception in research is morally problematic … and so too is not using it morally: reply to open peer commentaries on "the use of deception in public health behavioral intervention trials: a case study of three online alcohol trials".

Authors:  Jim McCambridge; Kypros Kypri; Preben Bendtsen; John Porter
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.229

7.  The use of deception in public health behavioral intervention trials: a case study of three online alcohol trials.

Authors:  Jim McCambridge; Kypros Kypri; Preben Bendtsen; John Porter
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 11.229

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.