Literature DB >> 18575303

Anterior torque control using partial-osseointegrated mini-implants: biocreative therapy type I technique.

Kyu-Rhim Chung1, Seong-Hun Kim, Yoon-Ah Kook, Ju-Hyon Son.   

Abstract

AIM: To show the effectiveness of the osseointegration-based mini-implant (C-Implant) in managing anterior torque control during en masse retraction of anterior dentition. Severe gable bends can be applied on utility archwire that is directly engaged in the hole of C-Implants to generate anterior torque on the anterior segment of teeth to resist lingual tipping during en masse retraction. This treatment mechanics is called the biocreative therapy type I technique. Partial osseointegration of C-Implants on the anteroposterior alveolar ridge is stable enough to resist intrusive force, vertically, and retraction force, anteroposteriorly, at the same time.
METHODS: The different treatment concept and procedure for treating maximum anchorage using the C-Implant is shown with case reports of treated patients. The biomechanics and clinical applications of this treatment are also described.
RESULTS: The authors show how C-Implants can provide effective torque control during anterior retraction, the potential indications thereof, and the simplicity of the mechanics.
CONCLUSION: The resistance to rotation force of the C-Implant can be used for anterior intrusion during retraction without concern of extrusion on posterior anchorage teeth. The biocreative therapy type I is a simple and quick technique for anterior torque control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18575303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Orthod        ISSN: 1530-5678


  6 in total

1.  Finite element study of controlling factors of anterior intrusion and torque during Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Device (TSAD) dependent en masse retraction without posterior appliances: Biocreative hybrid retractor (CH-retractor).

Authors:  Sung-Seo Mo; Min-Ki Noh; Seong-Hun Kim; Kyu-Rhim Chung; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Do sand blasted with large grit and acid etched surface treated mini-implants remain stationary under orthodontic forces?

Authors:  Seong-Hun Kim; Jeong-Ho Choi; Kyu-Rhim Chung; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Analysis of lingual en masse retraction combining a C-lingual retractor and a palatal plate.

Authors:  Jun-Shik Kim; Seong-Hun Kim; Yoon-Ah Kook; Kyu-Rhim Chung; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  In Vivo Comparison of the Efficiency of En-Masse Retraction Using Temporary Anchorage Devices With and Without Orthodontic Appliances on the Posterior Teeth.

Authors:  Sanjam Oswal; Sonali V Deshmukh; Sanket S Agarkar; Sachin Durkar; Chaitra Mastud; Jayesh S Rahalkar
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2022-06

5.  Resistance to immediate orthodontic loading of surface-treated mini-implants.

Authors:  Sung-Seo Mo; Seong-Hun Kim; Yoon-Ah Kook; Do-Min Jeong; Kyu-Rhim Chung; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Type of tooth movement during en masse retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth using labial versus lingual biocreative therapy in adults: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mais M Sadek; Noha E Sabet; Islam T Hassan
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 1.372

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.