Literature DB >> 18575222

Adapalene 0.1% gel compared to tazarotene 0.1% cream in the treatment of acne vulgaris.

David Pariser1, Luz E Colón, Lori A Johnson, Ronald W Gottschalk.   

Abstract

A variety of topical retinoids is available for the treatment of acne vulgaris. Selection of the appropriate treatment depends not only on efficacy but also on how well the patient can tolerate different formulations. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of daily adapalene 0.1% gel compared to daily tazarotene 0.1% cream and to demonstrate the noninferiority of adapalene 0.1% gel when compared to tazarotene 0.1% cream in treating acne. This represents 2 arms of a 3-arm study. Subjects 12 to 35 years of age with acne vulgaris (N=202) participated in a 12-week, randomized, evaluator-blinded study of once-daily therapy with adapalene 0.1% gel versus tazarotene 0.1% cream. The primary measure of efficacy was the reduction in total lesion counts posttreatment. Subjects treated with adapalene 0.1% gel achieved similar reductions in total lesion counts at week 12 compared to the subjects treated with the tazarotene cream, which demonstrates the noninferiority of adapalene treatment compared to tazarotene (median difference: -1.18%; lower confidence limit [LCL]: -9.26). At week 2, the number of patients that experienced erythema and scaling with tazarotene 0.1% cream was greater when compared to adapalene 0.1% gel and statistically significant. By week 12, the percentage of subjects reporting cutaneous irritation had returned to or near baseline levels and was similar between treatment arms for all parameters assessed. Adapalene gel was associated with fewer treatment-related adverse events than tazarotene cream (36% versus 58%, respectively), and less than half as many adverse events that were "definitely" related to study treatment than tazarotene cream (20% versus 45%, respectively). Daily therapy with adapalene 0.1% gel was shown to be noninferior to tazarotene 0.1% cream in total acne lesion reductions, and during initial stages of treatment, demonstrated better tolerability with respect to erythema and scaling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18575222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol        ISSN: 1545-9616            Impact factor:   2.114


  7 in total

1.  Management of acne: Canadian clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Yuka Asai; Akerke Baibergenova; Maha Dutil; Shannon Humphrey; Peter Hull; Charles Lynde; Yves Poulin; Neil H Shear; Jerry Tan; John Toole; Catherine Zip
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Efficacy and Safety of Tazarotene 0.1% Plus Clindamycin 1% Gel Versus Adapalene 0.1% Plus Clindamycin 1% Gel in Facial Acne Vulgaris: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Rituparna Maiti; Chandra Sekhar Sirka; M A Ashique Rahman; Anand Srinivasan; Sansita Parida; Debasish Hota
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Bioavailability, Pharmacokinetics, and Transepidermal Water Loss of Short Contact Tazarotene Lotion 0.1% Versus Tazarotene (Tazorac®) Cream 0.1.

Authors:  Srinivas Sidgiddi; Kent Allenby; Franklin Okumu; Anirudh Gautam
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2019-09-01

4.  Problems in the reporting of acne clinical trials: a spot check from the 2009 Annual Evidence Update on Acne Vulgaris.

Authors:  John R Ingram; Douglas J C Grindlay; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 5.  Use of tazarotene foam for the treatment of acne vulgaris.

Authors:  Stamatis Gregoriou; Eleftheria Kritsotaki; Alexandros Katoulis; Dimitris Rigopoulos
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2014-05-27

Review 6.  Synchronizing Pharmacotherapy in Acne with Review of Clinical Care.

Authors:  Sarvajnamurthy Aradhya Sacchidanand; Koushik Lahiri; Kiran Godse; Narendra Gajanan Patwardhan; Anil Ganjoo; Rajendra Kharkar; Varsha Narayanan; Dhammraj Borade; Lyndon D'souza
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Adapalene Gel 0.1% Versus Placebo as Prophylaxis for Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Induced Acne-Like Rash: A Randomized Left-Right Comparative Evaluation (APPEARANCE).

Authors:  Naoko Chayahara; Toru Mukohara; Motoko Tachihara; Yoshimi Fujishima; Atsushi Fukunaga; Ken Washio; Masatsugu Yamamoto; Kyosuke Nakata; Kazuyuki Kobayashi; Kei Takenaka; Masanori Toyoda; Naomi Kiyota; Kazutoshi Tobimatsu; Hisayo Doi; Naomi Mizuta; Naho Marugami; Atsushi Kawaguchi; Chikako Nishigori; Yoshihiro Nishimura; Hironobu Minami
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-03-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.