Srinivas Sidgiddi1,2, Kent Allenby1,2, Franklin Okumu1,2, Anirudh Gautam1,2. 1. Drs. Sidgiddi, Allenby, and Okumu are with Promius Pharma in Princeton, New Jersey. 2. Mr. Gautam is with Dr. Reddy's Laboratories SA in Basel, Switzerland.
Abstract
Objective: Two clinical studies were conducted to 1) assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of tazarotene and tazarotenic acid in DFD-03 lotion (a 1-minute, short-contact formulation for the topical treatment of acne vulgaris) and tazarotene cream 0.1% and 2) to evaluate transepidermal water loss (TEWL) with DFD-03 lotion, tazarotene gel (0.1%), or vehicle. Design: The PK study included a single-center, randomized, multiple-dose, laboratory-blinded, open-label, parallel-design, and the TEWL study included a multiple-dose, within-subject comparison design. Participants: The PK study included healthy adult men aged 18 to 40 years (n=43), and the TEWL study included healthy adults, male or female, aged 18 to 40 years (n=24). Measurements: PK was assessed via Cmax, AUC0-12, AUC0-24, Tmax, Cmin, Tmin, and fluctuation. TEWL was assessed via evaporimetry. Results:Tazarotene levels were very low due to rapid esterase hydrolysis to the primary active metabolite, tazarotenic acid. Tazarotenic acid AUC0-24 ratios (%) were at least two times higher when the test product was applied twice daily (Treatment-1) versus once daily (Treatment-2) on Days 7 and 14 (268.73% and 254.42%, respectively). Tazarotenic acid AUC0-24 ratios (%) were nearly 100 percent for Treatment-1 versus once-daily tazarotene cream 0.1% (Treatment-3) (99.36% and 83.21%, on Days 7 and 14, respectively). Starting on Day 7, DFD-03 lotion TEWL readings were significantly greater than vehicle (p≤0.05), except for on one study day. DFD-03 lotion TEWL readings were numerically greater (nonsignificant) than tazarotene gel. Conclusion:DFD-03 lotion was well-tolerated, increased TEWL when applied twice daily for one minute, and had a PK profile with similar overall exposure as compared with commercially available tazarotene formulations applied once daily for 12 hours.
RCT Entities:
Objective: Two clinical studies were conducted to 1) assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of tazarotene and tazarotenic acid in DFD-03 lotion (a 1-minute, short-contact formulation for the topical treatment of acne vulgaris) and tazarotene cream 0.1% and 2) to evaluate transepidermal water loss (TEWL) with DFD-03 lotion, tazarotene gel (0.1%), or vehicle. Design: The PK study included a single-center, randomized, multiple-dose, laboratory-blinded, open-label, parallel-design, and the TEWL study included a multiple-dose, within-subject comparison design. Participants: The PK study included healthy adult men aged 18 to 40 years (n=43), and the TEWL study included healthy adults, male or female, aged 18 to 40 years (n=24). Measurements: PK was assessed via Cmax, AUC0-12, AUC0-24, Tmax, Cmin, Tmin, and fluctuation. TEWL was assessed via evaporimetry. Results:Tazarotene levels were very low due to rapid esterase hydrolysis to the primary active metabolite, tazarotenic acid. Tazarotenic acid AUC0-24 ratios (%) were at least two times higher when the test product was applied twice daily (Treatment-1) versus once daily (Treatment-2) on Days 7 and 14 (268.73% and 254.42%, respectively). Tazarotenic acid AUC0-24 ratios (%) were nearly 100 percent for Treatment-1 versus once-daily tazarotene cream 0.1% (Treatment-3) (99.36% and 83.21%, on Days 7 and 14, respectively). Starting on Day 7, DFD-03 lotion TEWL readings were significantly greater than vehicle (p≤0.05), except for on one study day. DFD-03 lotion TEWL readings were numerically greater (nonsignificant) than tazarotene gel. Conclusion: DFD-03 lotion was well-tolerated, increased TEWL when applied twice daily for one minute, and had a PK profile with similar overall exposure as compared with commercially available tazarotene formulations applied once daily for 12 hours.
Authors: Emil Tanghetti; Sunil Dhawan; Lawrence Green; Mark Ling; Jeanine Downie; Marguerite A Germain; J Scott Kasteler; Leon Kircik; Michael G Oefelein; Zoe Draelos Journal: J Drugs Dermatol Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 2.114