BACKGROUND: Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has been the most affordable regimen for the HIV-infected in developing countries. There are limited data comparing nevirapine (NVP) to efavirenz (EFV) in HIV-infected children. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of NVP-based regimens compared to EFV-based regimens in HIV-infected children in Thailand. METHODS: The medical records of HIV-infected children who had received NNRTI-based regimens for more than 6 months at the Department of Pediatrics, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand, were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 139 HIV-infected children studied, 70 were male, and the median age at treatment initiation was 6.08 years (range 0.32-14.56 years); the median duration of follow-up was 36 months (range 6-66 months). The median baseline CD4 cell count was 185cells/mm(3) (range 2-3482cells/mm(3)) and the median baseline CD4 percentage was 7.20% (range 0.11-36.57%). An NVP-based regimen was initiated in 61 (44%): 38 antiretroviral (ARV)-naïve and 23 ARV-experienced. An EFV-based regimen was initiated in 78 (56%): 34 ARV-naïve and 44 ARV-experienced. The CD4 cell count and percentage gains were not different between the NVP and EFV groups in both the ARV-naïve and the ARV-experienced. However, ARV-naïve children who received an EFV regimen had significantly lower baseline CD4 levels than those who received an NVP regimen. ARV-naïve children had a better CD4 response than the ARV-experienced. The survival rates of children in the NVP groups were not different from those in the EFV groups for both the ARV-naïve and the ARV-experienced. Treatment failure occurred in one ARV-naïve NVP case (2.6%), two ARV-naïve EFV cases (5.8%), and nine ARV-experienced NVP cases (39%) at 24 months of treatment, and 11 ARV-experienced EFV cases (25%) at 18 months of treatment. Seven (10%) children had adverse effects from treatment with NVP. The main side effects were rash and hepatitis; six had to switch to EFV. Four (5%) children had adverse effects from treatment with EFV; two had to switch to NVP. CONCLUSIONS: Both NVP- and EFV-based HAART regimens were effective in children in Thailand for at least 3 years. HIV-infected Thai children generally tolerated NNRTI well.
BACKGROUND: Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has been the most affordable regimen for the HIV-infected in developing countries. There are limited data comparing nevirapine (NVP) to efavirenz (EFV) in HIV-infectedchildren. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of NVP-based regimens compared to EFV-based regimens in HIV-infectedchildren in Thailand. METHODS: The medical records of HIV-infectedchildren who had received NNRTI-based regimens for more than 6 months at the Department of Pediatrics, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand, were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 139 HIV-infectedchildren studied, 70 were male, and the median age at treatment initiation was 6.08 years (range 0.32-14.56 years); the median duration of follow-up was 36 months (range 6-66 months). The median baseline CD4 cell count was 185cells/mm(3) (range 2-3482cells/mm(3)) and the median baseline CD4 percentage was 7.20% (range 0.11-36.57%). An NVP-based regimen was initiated in 61 (44%): 38 antiretroviral (ARV)-naïve and 23 ARV-experienced. An EFV-based regimen was initiated in 78 (56%): 34 ARV-naïve and 44 ARV-experienced. The CD4 cell count and percentage gains were not different between the NVP and EFV groups in both the ARV-naïve and the ARV-experienced. However, ARV-naïve children who received an EFV regimen had significantly lower baseline CD4 levels than those who received an NVP regimen. ARV-naïve children had a better CD4 response than the ARV-experienced. The survival rates of children in the NVP groups were not different from those in the EFV groups for both the ARV-naïve and the ARV-experienced. Treatment failure occurred in one ARV-naïve NVP case (2.6%), two ARV-naïve EFV cases (5.8%), and nine ARV-experienced NVP cases (39%) at 24 months of treatment, and 11 ARV-experienced EFV cases (25%) at 18 months of treatment. Seven (10%) children had adverse effects from treatment with NVP. The main side effects were rash and hepatitis; six had to switch to EFV. Four (5%) children had adverse effects from treatment with EFV; two had to switch to NVP. CONCLUSIONS: Both NVP- and EFV-based HAART regimens were effective in children in Thailand for at least 3 years. HIV-infected Thai children generally tolerated NNRTI well.
Authors: Andrzej Bienczak; Paolo Denti; Adrian Cook; Lubbe Wiesner; Veronica Mulenga; Cissy Kityo; Addy Kekitiinwa; Diana M Gibb; David Burger; Ann S Walker; Helen McIlleron Journal: AIDS Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Sara Mursleen; James H Irlam; Alicen B Spaulding; George W Rutherford; Nandi Siegfried Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-12-10
Authors: Elizabeth D Lowenthal; Jonas H Ellenberg; Edwin Machine; Aditi Sagdeo; Sefelani Boiditswe; Andrew P Steenhoff; Richard Rutstein; Gabriel Anabwani; Robert Gross Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Janneke H van Dijk; Catherine G Sutcliffe; Francis Hamangaba; Christopher Bositis; Douglas C Watson; William J Moss Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 3.240