CONTEXT: No formal comparison has been made between the pediatric post-highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) outcomes of resource-limited and developed countries. OBJECTIVE: To systematically quantify and compare major baseline characteristics and clinical end points after HAART between resource-limited and developed settings. METHODS: Published articles and abstracts (International AIDS Society 2009, Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections 2010) were examined from inception (first available publication for each search engine) to March 2010. Publications that contained data on post-HAART mortality, weight-for-age z score (WAZ), CD4 count, or viral load (VL) changes in pediatric populations were reviewed. Selected studies met the following criteria: (1) patients were younger than 21 years; (2) HAART was given (≥ 3 antiretroviral medications); and (3) there were >20 patients. Data were extracted for baseline age, CD4 count, VL, WAZ, and mortality, CD4 and virologic suppression over time. Studies were categorized as having been performed in a resource-limited country (RLC) or developed country (DC) on the basis of the United Nations designation. Mean percentage of deaths per cohort and deaths per 100 child-years, baseline CD4 count, VL, WAZ, and age were calculated for RLCs and DCs and compared by using independent samples t tests. RESULTS: Forty RLC and 28 DC publications were selected (N = 17 875 RLCs; N = 1835 DC). Mean percentage of deaths per cohort and mean deaths per 100 child-years after HAART were significantly higher in RLCs than DCs (7.6 vs 1.6, P < .001, and 8.0 vs 0.9, P < .001, respectively). Mean baseline CD4% was 12% in RLCs and 23% in DCs (P = .01). Mean baseline VLs were 5.5 vs 4.7 log(10) copies per mL in RLCs versus DCs (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline CD4% and VL differ markedly between DCs and RLCs, as does mortality after pediatric HAART. Earlier diagnosis and treatment of pediatric HIV in RLCs would be expected to result in better HAART outcomes.
CONTEXT: No formal comparison has been made between the pediatric post-highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) outcomes of resource-limited and developed countries. OBJECTIVE: To systematically quantify and compare major baseline characteristics and clinical end points after HAART between resource-limited and developed settings. METHODS: Published articles and abstracts (International AIDS Society 2009, Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections 2010) were examined from inception (first available publication for each search engine) to March 2010. Publications that contained data on post-HAART mortality, weight-for-age z score (WAZ), CD4 count, or viral load (VL) changes in pediatric populations were reviewed. Selected studies met the following criteria: (1) patients were younger than 21 years; (2) HAART was given (≥ 3 antiretroviral medications); and (3) there were >20 patients. Data were extracted for baseline age, CD4 count, VL, WAZ, and mortality, CD4 and virologic suppression over time. Studies were categorized as having been performed in a resource-limited country (RLC) or developed country (DC) on the basis of the United Nations designation. Mean percentage of deaths per cohort and deaths per 100 child-years, baseline CD4 count, VL, WAZ, and age were calculated for RLCs and DCs and compared by using independent samples t tests. RESULTS: Forty RLC and 28 DC publications were selected (N = 17 875 RLCs; N = 1835 DC). Mean percentage of deaths per cohort and mean deaths per 100 child-years after HAART were significantly higher in RLCs than DCs (7.6 vs 1.6, P < .001, and 8.0 vs 0.9, P < .001, respectively). Mean baseline CD4% was 12% in RLCs and 23% in DCs (P = .01). Mean baseline VLs were 5.5 vs 4.7 log(10) copies per mL in RLCs versus DCs (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline CD4% and VL differ markedly between DCs and RLCs, as does mortality after pediatric HAART. Earlier diagnosis and treatment of pediatric HIV in RLCs would be expected to result in better HAART outcomes.
Authors: M W Kline; C V Fletcher; A T Harris; K D Evans; R C Brundage; R P Remmel; N R Calles; S B Kirkpatrick; C Simon Journal: J Pediatr Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: S A Spector; K Hsia; F H Yong; S Cabral; T Fenton; C V Fletcher; J McNamara; L M Mofenson; S E Starr Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2000-10-26 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: N K M van Kooten Niekerk; M M Knies; J Howard; H Rabie; M Zeier; A van Rensburg; N Frans; H S Schaaf; G Fatti; F Little; M F Cotton Journal: J Trop Pediatr Date: 2005-06-09 Impact factor: 1.165
Authors: R E Barth; J T M van der Meer; A I M Hoepelman; P A Schrooders; D A van de Vijver; S P M Geelen; H A Tempelman Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2008-07-16 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Moses R Kamya; Harriet Mayanja-Kizza; Andrew Kambugu; Sabrina Bakeera-Kitaka; Fred Semitala; Patricia Mwebaze-Songa; Barbara Castelnuovo; Petra Schaefer; Lisa A Spacek; Anne F Gasasira; Elly Katabira; Robert Colebunders; Thomas C Quinn; Allan Ronald; David L Thomas; Adeodata Kekitiinwa Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2007-10-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Marco T Luque; Cathy A Jenkins; Bryan E Shepherd; Denis Padgett; Vanessa Rouzier; Regina Célia M Succi; Daisy M Machado; Catherine C McGowan; Sten H Vermund; Jorge A Pinto Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Bill G Kapogiannis; Minn M Soe; Steven R Nesheim; Elaine J Abrams; Rosalind J Carter; John Farley; Paul Palumbo; Linda J Koenig; Marc Bulterys Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Dora Estripeaut; Jon Mosser; Meg Doherty; William Acosta; Harita Shah; Elizabeth Castaño; Kathia Luciani; Juan Miguel Pascale; Robert C Bollinger; Kathleen R Page Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.129