Literature DB >> 18571932

HeartMate II left ventricular assist device; early European experience.

Martin Strüber1, Kare Sander, Jaap Lahpor, Henrik Ahn, Pierre-Yves Litzler, Stavros G Drakos, Francesco Musumeci, Christian Schlensak, Ivar Friedrich, Ronny Gustafsson, Frank Oertel, Pascal Leprince.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The novel axial flow left ventricular assist device HeartMate II was introduced into clinical practice in Europe as part of the pilot study and after CE approval in November 2005. In order to get an overview of the use and performance of the device in Europe a group of investigators was founded to compare the initial results.
METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of the first 101 consecutive cases in Europe, data were collected with regard to postoperative outcome and severe adverse events and anticoagulation protocols. Results were stratified by intention to treat as a bridge to transplant or as chronic support therapy in heart failure (destination therapy).
RESULTS: In 70% of patients, the HeartMate II was intended as a bridge to transplant therapy, in 30%, it was used as a destination therapy device. The perioperative mortality post implant was 20% in the bridge to transplant patients and 7% in the destination therapy arm. However, after 1 year a comparable survival was observed in both groups (69% destination therapy, 63% bridge to transplant). Main causes of death were multiple organ failure (n=12) and cerebrovascular accidents (n=5). All, but one cerebrovascular accident occurred in the first 9 days after surgery. Only one other death was reported thereafter and there was no mechanical failure of the device.
CONCLUSIONS: Even in the early experience the HeartMate II was used as a chronic support device in a substantial number of patients in Europe. Although the total experience is still limited, the incidence of cerebrovascular accidents is very low and the survival beyond the perioperative period is excellent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18571932     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Improvements in implantable mechanical circulatory support systems : literature overview and update].

Authors:  T Krabatsch; M Schweiger; A Stepanenko; T Drews; E Potapov; M Pasic; Y Weng; M Huebler; R Hetzer
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  John C O'Horo; Omar M Abu Saleh; John M Stulak; Mark P Wilhelm; Larry M Baddour; M Rizwan Sohail
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 3.  Stroke and Intracranial Hemorrhage in HeartMate II and HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sung M Cho; Nader Moazami; Jennifer A Frontera
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 4.  The current status of heart transplantation and the development of "artificial heart systems".

Authors:  Martin Strüber; Anna L Meyer; Doris Malehsa; Christiane Kugler; Andre R Simon; Axel Haverich
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  Left Ventricular Assist Devices for Destination Therapy: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2016-02-08

6.  Contemporary outcomes of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices-a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicholas McNamara; Harry Narroway; Michael Williams; John Brookes; James Farag; David Cistulli; Paul Bannon; Silvana Marasco; Evgenij Potapov; Antonio Loforte
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-03

7.  Current trends in implantable left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Jens Garbade; Hartmuth B Bittner; Markus J Barten; Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 1.866

8.  Primary Diagnoses and Relative Risk in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices Visiting an Emergency Department in the United States.

Authors:  Martin Strueber
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.106

9.  Increased Thromboembolic Events With Dabigatran Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Martin Andreas; Roxana Moayedifar; Georg Wieselthaler; Michael Wolzt; Julia Riebandt; Thomas Haberl; Philipp Angleitner; Thomas Schlöglhofer; Dominik Wiedemann; Heinrich Schima; Guenther Laufer; Daniel Zimpfer
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 8.790

10.  Past and present of cardiocirculatory assist devices: a comprehensive critical review.

Authors:  Gianluca Rigatelli; Francesco Santini; Giuseppe Faggian
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.