Literature DB >> 18571698

Monitoring direct FXa-inhibitors and fondaparinux by Prothrombinase-induced Clotting Time (PiCT): relation to FXa-activity and influence of assay modifications.

Sebastian Harder1, Jeannine Parisius, Bettina Picard-Willems.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: FXa-activity can be measured by the Prothrombinase induced Clotting time (PiCT). The manufactured assay uses bovine FXa as component and employs a incubation period before re-calcification. Its use with new direct FXa-inhibitors is challenged by reports on decreased sensitivity.
METHODS: Blood was incubated with 3 investigational, structurally related (oxazolidinones) direct FXa-inhibitors including the recently approved agent rivaroxaban (0 - 2.0 microM), with the structurally distinct direct FXa-inhibitor DX 9065a (0 - 18 microM) and with the indirect inhibitor fondaparinux (0 - 0.6 microM). We tested modifications of PiCT regarding the source of FXa (bovine or human) and the incubation step (incubation before re-calcification=2-step, no incubation =1-step), and compared results with inhibition of human or bovine FXa-activity.
RESULTS: The bovine 2-step PiCT showed a paradoxical decrease with all direct FXa-inhibitors, this effect is surmounted only at high concentrations and is not seen with the bovine 1-step PiCT. The decrease in PiCT is not observed in antithrombin-depleted plasma. The humanized PiCT (1 or 2 step) showed a consistent prolongation under all direct inhibitors. Fondaparinux prolonged PiCT with either assay. The correlation between PiCT and corresponding FXa-activity was significant both for humanized 2-step PiCT or bovine 1 step PiCT (r2=0.80), but the 95% prediction interval was large and covered a span of 40% FXa-activity between one agent and another.
CONCLUSIONS: The customary bovine PiCT should only be used to monitor direct FXa-inhibitors when modified as 1-step procedure. PiCT is not suitable to assess similarity of FXa-inhibition when different agents are interchanged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18571698     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2008.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  6 in total

1.  New and emerging anticoagulant therapies for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Lori-Ann Linkins; Jeffrey I Weitz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2010-04

Review 2.  Laboratory Assessment of the Anticoagulant Activity of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bethany T Samuelson; Adam Cuker; Deborah M Siegal; Mark Crowther; David A Garcia
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Rivaroxaban: a review of its use in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Natalie J Carter; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Oral anticoagulants in the management of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  John N Makaryus; Jonathan L Halperin; Joe F Lau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Tailored glycopolymers as anticoagulant heparin mimetics.

Authors:  Young In Oh; Gloria J Sheng; Shuh-Kuen Chang; Linda C Hsieh-Wilson
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Laboratory assessment of rivaroxaban: a review.

Authors:  Meyer Michel Samama; Geneviève Contant; Theodore E Spiro; Elisabeth Perzborn; Lena Le Flem; Céline Guinet; Yves Gourmelin; Gabriele Rohde; Jean-Luc Martinoli
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2013-07-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.