Literature DB >> 18571678

Statistical cautions when estimating DEBtox parameters.

Elise Billoir1, Marie Laure Delignette-Muller, Alexandre R R Péry, Olivier Geffard, Sandrine Charles.   

Abstract

DEBtox (Dynamic Energy Budget in toxicology) models have been designed to analyse various results from classic tests in ecotoxicology. They consist of a set of mechanistic models describing how organisms manage their energy, when they are exposed to a contaminant. Until now, such a biology-based modeling approach has not been used within the regulatory context. However, these methods have been promoted and discussed in recent guidance documents on the statistical analysis of ecotoxicity data. Indeed, they help us to understand the underlying mechanisms. In this paper, we focused on the 21 day Daphnia magna reproduction test. We first aimed to clarify and detail the model building process leading to DEBtox models. Equations were rederived step by step, and for some of them we obtained results different from the published ones. Then, we statistically evaluated the estimation process quality when using a least squares approach. Using both experimental and simulated data, our analyses highlighted several statistical issues related to the fitting of DEBtox models on OECD-type reproduction data. In this case, particular attention had to be paid to parameter estimates and the interpretation of their confidence intervals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18571678     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  7 in total

1.  Survival data analyses in ecotoxicology: critical effect concentrations, methods and models. What should we use?

Authors:  Carole Forfait-Dubuc; Sandrine Charles; Elise Billoir; Marie Laure Delignette-Muller
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Consequences of a multi-generation exposure to uranium on Caenorhabditis elegans life parameters and sensitivity.

Authors:  Benoit Goussen; Florian Parisot; Rémy Beaudouin; Morgan Dutilleul; Adeline Buisset-Goussen; Alexandre R R Péry; Jean-Marc Bonzom
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  In Silico Methods for Environmental Risk Assessment: Principles, Tiered Approaches, Applications, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Astuto; Matteo R Di Nicola; José V Tarazona; A Rortais; Yann Devos; A K Djien Liem; George E N Kass; Maria Bastaki; Reinhilde Schoonjans; Angelo Maggiore; Sandrine Charles; Aude Ratier; Christelle Lopes; Ophelia Gestin; Tobin Robinson; Antony Williams; Nynke Kramer; Edoardo Carnesecchi; Jean-Lou C M Dorne
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Sublethal toxicant effects with dynamic energy budget theory: application to mussel outplants.

Authors:  Erik B Muller; Craig W Osenberg; Russell J Schmitt; Sally J Holbrook; Roger M Nisbet
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Sublethal toxicant effects with dynamic energy budget theory: model formulation.

Authors:  Erik B Muller; Roger M Nisbet; Heather A Berkley
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  An individual-based model of zebrafish population dynamics accounting for energy dynamics.

Authors:  Rémy Beaudouin; Benoit Goussen; Benjamin Piccini; Starrlight Augustine; James Devillers; François Brion; Alexandre R R Péry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The application and limitations of exposure multiplication factors in sublethal effect modelling.

Authors:  Neil Sherborne; Tjalling Jager; Benoit Goussen; Marie Trijau; Roman Ashauer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.