PURPOSE: To examine the evidence that a series of cases of diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) was caused by a type of marker pen. SETTING: Eye Institute, Auckland, New Zealand. METHODS: During a 10-week period, 522 consecutive LASIK procedures were performed using a 60 Hz IntraLase femtosecond laser (IntraLase Corp.) to create the LASIK flap and a 217Z 100 Hz excimer laser (Bausch & Lomb) to perform the refractive ablation. As standard practice, a marking pen was used to enable accurate flap realignment. Three weeks after a sudden increase in the incidence of DLK was identified, one of the 5 surgeons performed 5 consecutive bilateral cases using the marking pen in the right eyes but not in the left eyes. RESULTS: Of the 522 LASIK cases (119 without marking pen, 403 with marking pen), DLK developed in 49 (9.4%). No eye treated without the marking pen developed DLK; of those in which the marking pen was used, 49 (12.2%) developed DLK (P<0.0001, Fischer exact test; odds ratio, 27). In the 5 consecutive bilateral cases in which the marking pen was used in the right eye but not the left eye, 4 right eyes and no left eye developed DLK (P=0.03). Forty-five of the 49 eyes with DLK quickly recovered. The other 4 developed central toxic keratopathy. CONCLUSION: There is strong statistical evidence that the marking pen was a factor in the occurrence of DLK.
PURPOSE: To examine the evidence that a series of cases of diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) was caused by a type of marker pen. SETTING: Eye Institute, Auckland, New Zealand. METHODS: During a 10-week period, 522 consecutive LASIK procedures were performed using a 60 Hz IntraLase femtosecond laser (IntraLase Corp.) to create the LASIK flap and a 217Z 100 Hz excimer laser (Bausch & Lomb) to perform the refractive ablation. As standard practice, a marking pen was used to enable accurate flap realignment. Three weeks after a sudden increase in the incidence of DLK was identified, one of the 5 surgeons performed 5 consecutive bilateral cases using the marking pen in the right eyes but not in the left eyes. RESULTS: Of the 522 LASIK cases (119 without marking pen, 403 with marking pen), DLK developed in 49 (9.4%). No eye treated without the marking pen developed DLK; of those in which the marking pen was used, 49 (12.2%) developed DLK (P<0.0001, Fischer exact test; odds ratio, 27). In the 5 consecutive bilateral cases in which the marking pen was used in the right eye but not the left eye, 4 right eyes and no left eye developed DLK (P=0.03). Forty-five of the 49 eyes with DLK quickly recovered. The other 4 developed central toxic keratopathy. CONCLUSION: There is strong statistical evidence that the marking pen was a factor in the occurrence of DLK.
Authors: Fernando H de Paula; Christian G Khairallah; Leslie M Niziol; David C Musch; Roni M Shtein Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2012-04-08 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: Christina H Choe; Carly Guss; David C Musch; Leslie M Niziol; Roni M Shtein Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: Mathew S Ward; Jordan P Hastings; Kathryn M Shmunes; Yasmyne Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes; Majid Moshirfar Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep Date: 2021-12-16