Literature DB >> 18570710

Intermittent catheterization practices following spinal cord injury: a national survey.

M Gail Woodbury1, Keith C Hayes, Heather K Askes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify intermittent catheterization (IC) practices and factors associated with urinary tract infection (UTI) in community-dwelling people living with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Canada. STUDY
DESIGN: A national survey employing a 36-item self-report questionnaire that was mailed to members of the Canadian Paraplegic Association (CPA).
RESULTS: There were 912 respondents with SCI of either traumatic or nontraumatic etiology. Fifty-five percent of the respondents used IC. The mean age of users (47+/-14 years) was significantly younger than non-users (53+/-13 years) and a greater percentage of males (57%) than females (50%) used IC. Of those who used IC, 26% use hydrophilic catheters either exclusively or sometimes. The mean frequency of UTIs in the past 12 months for IC users was 2.6+/-2.6. Among IC users, females had a significantly greater number of UTIs than males (p=0.003). Linear regression analysis revealed that the variables of sex, number of catheterizations per day, age, and tetraplegia versus paraplegia were individually correlated with infection rate but collectively only explained a small proportion of the variance. Time lost from social activities due to UTIs was associated with compromised quality of life more so than the actual number of UTIs or days lost from work.
CONCLUSION: The survey identifies existing IC practices and confirms previous reports of UTI rate being dependent on frequency of catheterization and reduced infection rates in individuals using hydrophilic catheters. UTI rates were significantly associated with several clinical and demographic variables but only poorly modeled by the IC practices and lifestyle variables investigated in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18570710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Urol        ISSN: 1195-9479            Impact factor:   1.344


  14 in total

1.  The good, the bad and the ugly of catheterization practices among elite athletes with spinal cord injury: a global perspective.

Authors:  A Krassioukov; J J Cragg; C West; C Voss; D Krassioukov-Enns
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 2.  [The relevance of catheterization in neurourology].

Authors:  R Böthig; H Burgdörfer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  A Web-Based Self-Management Intervention for Intermittent Catheter Users.

Authors:  Mary H Wilde; Eileen Fairbanks; Robert Parshall; Feng Zhang; Sarah Miner; Deborah Thayer; Brian Harrington; Judith Brasch; Dan Schneiderman; James M McMahon
Journal:  Urol Nurs       Date:  2015 May-Jun

Review 4.  Clean intermittent catheterization revisited.

Authors:  Eliza Lamin; Diane K Newman
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Outcome comparison of different approaches to self-intermittent catheterization in neurogenic patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Shamout; X Biardeau; J Corcos; L Campeau
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Catheter-related urinary tract infection in patients suffering from spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  Amela Dedeić-Ljubović; Mirsada Hukić
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.363

7.  Intermittent Catheters for Chronic Urinary Retention: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

8.  Giving intermittent catheter users more choice.

Authors:  Brian Buckley; Mandy Fader; Margaret Macauley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 9.  Contemporary management considerations of urinary tract infections for women with spina bifida.

Authors:  Ellen Fremion; Paola Bustillos; Rose Khavari
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 10.  Intermittent self catheterisation with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: a systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Sarah L Bermingham; Sarah Hodgkinson; Sue Wright; Ellie Hayter; Julian Spinks; Carol Pellowe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.