BACKGROUND: Current obesity interventions use intensive behavior changes to achieve large initial weight loss. However, weight regain after treatment is common, and drop out rates are relatively high. Smaller behavioral changes could produce initial weight loss and be easier to sustain after active treatment. PURPOSE: We examined the efficacy of an intervention that targeted small but cumulative participant-chosen changes in diet and physical activity (ASPIRE) and compared this treatment to standard didactic and wait-list control groups. The primary outcome measures were body weight, waist circumference, and intra-abdominal fat. METHODS:Fifty-nine overweight or obese sedentary adults were randomized to one of three groups: (1) the ASPIRE group (n = 20), (2) a standard educationally-based treatment group (n = 20), or (3) a wait list control group (n = 19) for 4 months. Active treatment groups received identical resistance and aerobic training programs. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analyses showed that participants in the ASPIRE group lost significantly more weight than the standard and control groups (-4.4 vs. -1.1 and +0.1 kg, respectively), and the greater initial weight loss in the ASPIRE group was sustained 3 months after active treatment (4.1 kg). An alternative analytic strategy (0.3 kg/month weight gain for those lost to follow-up) showed continued weight loss (-0.2 kg after active treatment; -4.6 kg from baseline) at follow-up in the ASPIRE group. Similar patterns were observed for the other adiposity measures. CONCLUSION: More modest behavioral changes are capable of promoting weight loss, decreasing adiposity markers and sustaining these changes over 3 months. Longer-term studies comparing this approach with traditional behavioral weight loss treatments are warranted.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Current obesity interventions use intensive behavior changes to achieve large initial weight loss. However, weight regain after treatment is common, and drop out rates are relatively high. Smaller behavioral changes could produce initial weight loss and be easier to sustain after active treatment. PURPOSE: We examined the efficacy of an intervention that targeted small but cumulative participant-chosen changes in diet and physical activity (ASPIRE) and compared this treatment to standard didactic and wait-list control groups. The primary outcome measures were body weight, waist circumference, and intra-abdominal fat. METHODS: Fifty-nine overweight or obese sedentary adults were randomized to one of three groups: (1) the ASPIRE group (n = 20), (2) a standard educationally-based treatment group (n = 20), or (3) a wait list control group (n = 19) for 4 months. Active treatment groups received identical resistance and aerobic training programs. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analyses showed that participants in the ASPIRE group lost significantly more weight than the standard and control groups (-4.4 vs. -1.1 and +0.1 kg, respectively), and the greater initial weight loss in the ASPIRE group was sustained 3 months after active treatment (4.1 kg). An alternative analytic strategy (0.3 kg/month weight gain for those lost to follow-up) showed continued weight loss (-0.2 kg after active treatment; -4.6 kg from baseline) at follow-up in the ASPIRE group. Similar patterns were observed for the other adiposity measures. CONCLUSION: More modest behavioral changes are capable of promoting weight loss, decreasing adiposity markers and sustaining these changes over 3 months. Longer-term studies comparing this approach with traditional behavioral weight loss treatments are warranted.
Authors: Mary E Jung; Matthew J Stork; Jessica Stapleton; Jessica E Bourne; Kathleen A Martin Ginis Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Laura J Damschroder; David E Goodrich; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Robert Holleman; Leah Gillon; Susan Kirsh; Caroline R Richardson; Lesley D Lutes Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Lesley D Lutes; Laura J Damschroder; Robin Masheb; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Leah Gillon; Robert G Holleman; David E Goodrich; Julie C Lowery; Carol Janney; Susan Kirsh; Caroline R Richardson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Richard A Winett; Brenda M Davy; Elaina Marinik; Jyoti Savla; Sheila G Winett; Stuart M Phillips; Lesley D Lutes Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Mara Cristina Lofrano-Prado; Hanna Karen Moreira Antunes; Wagner Luiz do Prado; Aline de Piano; Danielle Arisa Caranti; Lian Tock; June Carnier; Sergio Tufik; Marco Túlio de Mello; Ana R Dâmaso Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2009-07-03 Impact factor: 3.186