Literature DB >> 18567729

Genetic diversity in native and commercial breeds of pigs in Portugal assessed by microsatellites.

A A Vicente1, M I Carolino, M C O Sousa, C Ginja, F S Silva, A M Martinez, J L Vega-Pla, N Carolino, L T Gama.   

Abstract

Population structure and genetic diversity in the Portuguese native breeds of pigs Alentejano (AL), Bísaro (BI), and Malhado de Alcobaça (MA) and the exotic breeds Duroc (DU), Landrace (LR), Large White (LW), and Pietrain were analyzed by typing 22 microsatellite markers in 249 individuals. In general, the markers used were greatly polymorphic, with mean total and effective number of alleles per locus of 10.68 and 4.33, respectively, and an expected heterozygosity of 0.667 across loci. The effective number of alleles per locus and expected heterozygosity were greatest in BI, LR, and AL, and least in DU. Private alleles were found in 9 of the 22 markers analyzed, mostly in AL, but also in the other breeds, with the exception of LW. The proportion of loci not in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in each breed analyzed ranged between 0.23 (AL) and 0.41 (BI, LW, and Pietrain), mostly because of a less than expected number of heterozygotes in those loci. With the exception of MA, all breeds showed a significant deficit in heterozygosity (F(IS); P < 0.05), which was more pronounced in BI (F(IS) = 0.175) and AL (F(IS) = 0.139), suggesting that inbreeding is a major concern, especially in these breeds that have gone through a genetic bottleneck in the recent past. The analysis of relationships among breeds, assessed by different methods, indicates that DU and AL are the more distanced breeds relative to the others, with the closest relationship being observed between LR and MA. The degree of differentiation between subpopulations (F(ST)) indicates that 0.184 of the total genetic variability can be attributed to differences among breeds. The analysis of individual distances based on allele sharing indicates that animals of the same breed generally cluster together, but subdivision is observed in the BI and LR breeds. Furthermore, the analysis of population structure indicates there is very little admixture among breeds, with each one being identified with a single ancestral population. The results of this study confirm that native breeds of pigs represent a very interesting reservoir of allelic diversity, even though the current levels of inbreeding raise concerns. Therefore, appropriate conservation efforts should be undertaken, such as adopting strategies aimed at minimizing inbreeding, to avoid further losses of genetic diversity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18567729     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  12 in total

1.  Conservation priorities of Iberoamerican pig breeds and their ancestors based on microsatellite information.

Authors:  O Cortés; A M Martinez; J Cañon; N Sevane; L T Gama; C Ginja; V Landi; P Zaragoza; N Carolino; A Vicente; P Sponenberg; J V Delgado
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Molecular characterization and genetic structure of the Nero Siciliano pig breed.

Authors:  Anna Maria Guastella; Andrea Criscione; Donata Marletta; Antonio Zuccaro; Luigi Chies; Salvatore Bordonaro
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 1.771

3.  Genetic characterization of Uruguayan Pampa Rocha pigs with microsatellite markers.

Authors:  M Montenegro; S Llambí; G Castro; N Barlocco; A Vadell; V Landi; J V Delgado; A Martínez
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 1.771

4.  Inbreeding and genetic diversity in three imported Swine breeds in china using pedigree data.

Authors:  G Q Tang; J Xue; M J Lian; R F Yang; T F Liu; Z Y Zeng; A A Jiang; Y Z Jiang; L Zhu; L Bai; Z Wang; X W Li
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.509

5.  Linkage disequilibrium patterns and persistence of phase in purebred and crossbred pig (Sus scrofa) populations.

Authors:  Renata Veroneze; John W M Bastiaansen; Egbert F Knol; Simone E F Guimarães; Fabyano F Silva; Barbara Harlizius; Marcos S Lopes; Paulo S Lopes
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.797

6.  Genomic structure of a crossbred Landrace pig population.

Authors:  Letícia Borges Joaquim; Tatiane Cristina Seleguim Chud; Jorge Augusto Petroli Marchesi; Rodrigo Pelicioni Savegnago; Marcos Eli Buzanskas; Ricardo Zanella; Mauricio Egidio Cantão; Jane Oliveira Peixoto; Mônica Correa Ledur; Renato Irgang; Danísio Prado Munari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genetic diversity analysis of Thai indigenous pig population using microsatellite markers

Authors:  Rangsun Charoensook; Kesinee Gatphayak; Bertram Brenig; Christoph Knorr
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.509

8.  Evaluation of the genetic structure of indigenous Okinawa Agu pigs using microsatellite markers.

Authors:  Shihei Touma; Aisaku Arakawa; Takuro Oikawa
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.509

9.  Microsatellite DNA Analysis for Diversity Study, Individual Identification and Parentage Control in Pig Breeds in Poland.

Authors:  Anna Radko; Grzegorz Smołucha; Anna Koseniuk
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Genetic structure, relationships and admixture with wild relatives in native pig breeds from Iberia and its islands.

Authors:  Luis T Gama; Amparo M Martínez; Inês Carolino; Vincenzo Landi; Juan V Delgado; Antonio A Vicente; José L Vega-Pla; Oscar Cortés; Conceição O Sousa
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.