| Literature DB >> 21637573 |
Anna Maria Guastella1, Andrea Criscione, Donata Marletta, Antonio Zuccaro, Luigi Chies, Salvatore Bordonaro.
Abstract
Nero Siciliano is an autochthonous pig breed that is reared mainly in semi-extensive systems in northeastern Sicily. Despite its economic importance and well-appreciated meat products, this breed is currently endangered. Consequently, an analysis of intra-breed variability is a fundamental step in preserving this genetic resource and its breeding system. In this work, we used 25 microsatellite markers to examine the genetic composition of 147 unrelated Nero Siciliano pigs. The total number of alleles detected (249, 9.96 per locus) and the expected heterozygosity (0.708) indicated that this breed had a high level of genetic variability. Bayesian cluster analysis showed that the most likely number of groups into which the sample could be partitioned was nine. Based on the proportion of each individuals genome derived from ancestry, pigs with at least 70% of their genome belonging to one cluster were assigned to that cluster. The cluster size ranged from 7 to 17 (n = 108). Genetic variability in this sub-population was slightly lower than in the whole sample, genetic differentiation among clusters was moderate (F(ST) 0.125) and the F(IS) value was 0.011. NeighborNet and correspondence analysis revealed two clusters as the most divergent. Molecular coancestry analysis confirmed the good within-breed variability and highlighted the clusters that retained the highest genetic diversity.Entities:
Keywords: Nero Siciliano pig breed; cluster analysis; coancestry; intra-breed genetic variation; microsatellites
Year: 2010 PMID: 21637573 PMCID: PMC3036141 DOI: 10.1590/S1415-47572010005000075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Mol Biol ISSN: 1415-4757 Impact factor: 1.771
Number of observed (NA) and effective (Ae) alleles, observed (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He), and FIS per locus.
| Locus | NA | Ae | Ho | He | FIS |
| 16 | 5.66 | 0.738 | 0.823 | 0.107* | |
| 9 | 5.24 | 0.762 | 0.809*** | 0.061 | |
| 7 | 3.25 | 0.632 | 0.692 | 0.091 | |
| 8 | 3.82 | 0.732 | 0.738 | 0.012 | |
| 19 | 10.78 | 0.782 | 0.907** | 0.141*** | |
| 8 | 1.94 | 0.429 | 0.484 | 0.117 | |
| 11 | 3.85 | 0.676 | 0.740 | 0.091 | |
| 9 | 4.02 | 0.731 | 0.751 | 0.030 | |
| 7 | 3.97 | 0.600 | 0.748*** | 0.201** | |
| 7 | 1.68 | 0.380 | 0.403 | 0.060 | |
| 8 | 3.65 | 0.695 | 0.726 | 0.046 | |
| 13 | 6.73 | 0.667 | 0.851** | 0.221*** | |
| 14 | 8.75 | 0.810 | 0.886* | 0.089 | |
| 6 | 2.08 | 0.293 | 0.519*** | 0.439*** | |
| 14 | 6.14 | 0.738 | 0.837* | 0.122* | |
| 12 | 2.37 | 0.500 | 0.578* | 0.138* | |
| 8 | 3.20 | 0.600 | 0.688 | 0.131 | |
| 11 | 7.14 | 0.760 | 0.860 | 0.119** | |
| 10 | 2.62 | 0.558 | 0.618 | 0.101 | |
| 12 | 7.53 | 0.807 | 0.867 | 0.073 | |
| 5 | 2.29 | 0.521 | 0.562 | 0.077 | |
| 11 | 5.45 | 0.782 | 0.817 | 0.045 | |
| 6 | 1.32 | 0.221 | 0.245* | 0.102 | |
| 12 | 6.27 | 0.828 | 0.840 | 0.019 | |
| 6 | 3.51 | 0.603 | 0.715* | 0.160** | |
| Average | 9.96 | 4.53 | 0.634 | 0.708*** | 0.109*** |
Deviations from H-W equilibrium and significance of the FIS values are indicated by asterisks (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001).
Number of heads, average number of observed (NA) alleles per locus, private alleles (Ap) with the highest allele frequency in parentheses, observed (Ho) and expected (He) heterozygosities, and FIS values per cluster and for the subsample of 108 pigs. The contribution of allelic richness (CAr) and gene diversity (CGD) per cluster to the diversity of the subsample is also shown.
| Cluster | Heads | NA | Ap | Ho | He | FIS | CAr | CGD |
| K1 | 13 | 6.32 | 4 (11.5) | 0.675 | 0.669 | 0.033 | 2.059 | -1.044 |
| K2 | 8 | 3.88 | 5 (25.0) | 0.670 | 0.600 | -0.046 | 1.154 | -1.136 |
| K3 | 10 | 4.48 | 5 (38.9) | 0.574 | 0.621** | 0.137* | 1.048 | -0.498 |
| K4 | 12 | 4.88 | 2 (16.7) | 0.568 | 0.601* | 0.106* | 0.798 | -0.082 |
| K5 | 12 | 4.16 | 1 (8.3) | 0.627 | 0.556 | -0.084 | -0.724 | 0.319 |
| K6 | 15 | 5.72 | 4 (13.3) | 0.683 | 0.642 | -0.029 | 0.814 | -0.354 |
| K7 | 14 | 3.72 | 4 (35.7) | 0.543 | 0.511 | -0.026 | -1.535 | 0.332 |
| K8 | 17 | 5.76 | 4 (11.8) | 0.629 | 0.616 | 0.002 | -0.365 | 0.747 |
| K9 | 7 | 4.12 | 4 (14.3) | 0.632 | 0.607 | 0.032 | 0.456 | -0.278 |
| Total | 108 | 9.52 | 33 | 0.622 | 0.706 | 0.011 | - | - |
Figure 1Summary of individual and cluster positions according to the first and second axis of dispersion in correspondence analysis. Circles and squares indicate clusters and individuals, respectively.