Literature DB >> 18567248

Eye movements enhance memory for individuals who are strongly right-handed and harm it for individuals who are not.

Keith B Lyle1, Jessica M Logan, Henry L Roediger.   

Abstract

Subjects who make repetitive saccadic eye movements before a memory test subsequently exhibit superior retrieval in comparison with subjects who do not move their eyes. It has been proposed that eye movements enhance retrieval by increasing interaction of the left and right cerebral hemispheres. To test this, we compared the effect of eye movements on subsequent recall (Experiment 1) and recognition (Experiment 2) in two groups thought to differ in baseline degree of hemispheric interaction-individuals who are strongly right-handed (SR) and individuals who are not (nSR). For SR subjects, who naturally may experience less hemispheric interaction than nSR subjects, eye movements enhanced retrieval. In contrast, depending on the measure, eye movements were either inconsequential or even detrimental for nSR subjects. These results partially support the hemispheric interaction account, but demand an amendment to explain the harmful effects of eye movements for nSR individuals.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18567248     DOI: 10.3758/pbr.15.3.515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  24 in total

1.  Factors that determine false recall: a multiple regression analysis.

Authors:  H L Roediger; J M Watson; K B McDermott; D A Gallo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  Microstimulation of the frontal eye field and its effects on covert spatial attention.

Authors:  Tirin Moore; Mazyar Fallah
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with decreased false memories in a verbal converging semantic associates paradigm.

Authors:  Stephen D Christman; Ruth E Propper; Adam Dion
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with earlier offset of childhood amnesia.

Authors:  Stephen D Christman; Ruth E Propper; Tiffany J Brown
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Hemispheric asymmetries in semantic processing: evidence from false memories for ambiguous words.

Authors:  Miriam Faust; Elisheva Ben-Artzi; Itay Harel
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Handedness is related to memory via hemispheric interaction: evidence from paired associate recall and source memory tasks.

Authors:  Keith B Lyle; David P McCabe; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Mixed- versus strong right-handedness is associated with biases towards "remember" versus "know" judgements in recognition memory: role of interhemispheric interaction.

Authors:  Ruth E Propper; Stephen D Christman
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2004-11

8.  Pursuit and saccadic eye movement subregions in human frontal eye field: a high-resolution fMRI investigation.

Authors:  Caterina Rosano; Christine M Krisky; Joel S Welling; William F Eddy; Beatriz Luna; Keith R Thulborn; John A Sweeney
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Cerebral dominance, sex, and callosal size in MRI.

Authors:  A Kertesz; M Polk; J Howell; S E Black
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Bilateral eye movements enhance the retrieval of episodic memories.

Authors:  Stephen D Christman; Kilian J Garvey; Ruth E Propper; Keri A Phaneuf
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  12 in total

1.  A combined fMRI and DTI examination of functional language lateralization and arcuate fasciculus structure: Effects of degree versus direction of hand preference.

Authors:  Ruth E Propper; Lauren J O'Donnell; Stephen Whalen; Yanmei Tie; Isaiah H Norton; Ralph O Suarez; Lilla Zollei; Alireza Radmanesh; Alexandra J Golby
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Inconsistent handedness is linked to more successful foreign language vocabulary learning.

Authors:  Vera Kempe; Patricia J Brooks; Stephen D Christman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-06

3.  Saccade-induced retrieval enhancement and the recovery of perceptual item-specific information.

Authors:  Andrew Parker; Jolyon Poole; Neil Dagnall
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-12-16

4.  Memory for hand-use depends on consistency of handedness.

Authors:  James M Edlin; Emily K Carris; Keith B Lyle
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Do Horizontal Saccadic Eye Movements Increase Interhemispheric Coherence? Investigation of a Hypothesized Neural Mechanism Underlying EMDR.

Authors:  Zoe Samara; Bernet M Elzinga; Heleen A Slagter; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 6.  Independent and collaborative contributions of the cerebral hemispheres to emotional processing.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Shobe
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Replication Requires Psychological Rather than Statistical Hypotheses: The Case of Eye Movements Enhancing Word Recollection.

Authors:  R Hans Phaf
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-26

8.  Eye exercises enhance accuracy and letter recognition, but not reaction time, in a modified rapid serial visual presentation task.

Authors:  Paula Di Noto; Sorin Uta; Joseph F X DeSouza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Degree of Handedness, but not Direction, is a Systematic Predictor of Cognitive Performance.

Authors:  Eric Prichard; Ruth E Propper; Stephen D Christman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-31

10.  Effects of saccadic bilateral eye movements on episodic and semantic autobiographical memory fluency.

Authors:  Andrew Parker; Adam Parkin; Neil Dagnall
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.