Literature DB >> 15724359

Mixed- versus strong right-handedness is associated with biases towards "remember" versus "know" judgements in recognition memory: role of interhemispheric interaction.

Ruth E Propper1, Stephen D Christman.   

Abstract

Growing evidence supports the hypothesis that episodic versus semantic memories rely primarily on interhemispheric versus intrahemispheric processing, respectively. For example, a recent study found that individuals with presumed greater interhemispheric interaction were superior in episodic recall but inferior at semantic word fragment completion; however, tests of recognition memory yielded no group differences. Interestingly, recognition memory can be based on either explicitly remembering a stimulus or implicitly knowing that a stimulus had been presented. The current experiments administered recognition memory tests to strongly versus mixed handed participants who judged for each recognised item whether their response was based on remembering (episodic memory) or knowing (semantic memory) (Tulving, 1983). Results indicate that strong versus mixed handers are biased towards basing recognition responses on judgements of knowing versus remembering, respectively. As strong versus mixed handedness is associated with greater versus lesser interhemispheric processing, the results support the original hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15724359     DOI: 10.1080/09658210344000503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  8 in total

1.  A mixed-handed advantage in episodic memory: a possible role of interhemispheric interaction.

Authors:  Ruth E Propper; Stephen D Christman; Keri Ann Phaneuf
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-06

2.  Eye movements enhance memory for individuals who are strongly right-handed and harm it for individuals who are not.

Authors:  Keith B Lyle; Jessica M Logan; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

3.  Structural asymmetry of anterior insula: behavioral correlates and individual differences.

Authors:  Christine Chiarello; David Vazquez; Adam Felton; Christiana M Leonard
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  The contributions of handedness and working memory to episodic memory.

Authors:  Aparna Sahu; Stephen D Christman; Ruth E Propper
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-11

5.  Memory for hand-use depends on consistency of handedness.

Authors:  James M Edlin; Emily K Carris; Keith B Lyle
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Sex, Age, and Handedness Modulate the Neural Correlates of Active Learning.

Authors:  Sangeeta Nair; Rodolphe E Nenert; Jane B Allendorfer; Adam M Goodman; Jennifer Vannest; Daniel Mirman; Jerzy P Szaflarski
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Degree of Handedness, but not Direction, is a Systematic Predictor of Cognitive Performance.

Authors:  Eric Prichard; Ruth E Propper; Stephen D Christman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-31

8.  Effects of saccadic bilateral eye movements on episodic and semantic autobiographical memory fluency.

Authors:  Andrew Parker; Adam Parkin; Neil Dagnall
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.