Literature DB >> 18565440

POWER for reproductive health: results from a social marketing campaign promoting female and male condoms.

Sheana S Bull1, Samuel F Posner, Charlene Ortiz, Brenda Beaty, Kathryn Benton, Lillian Lin, Sherri L Pals, Tom Evans.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate effects of a 6-month social marketing campaign on awareness of, attitudes toward and use of female as well as male condoms for 15-25 year-old-women.
METHODS: Using a time-space sampling methodology, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of 3407 women at pre-campaign in 12 western U.S. neighborhoods on female and male condom awareness, attitudes, and use. Six of the 12 study neighborhoods were randomly selected to receive the POWER social marketing campaign designed to impact condom knowledge, attitudes, and use. The campaign was followed with another cross-sectional survey of 3,003 women in all 12 study neighborhoods on condom knowledge, attitudes, use and awareness of POWER materials. We compared pre-and post-campaign surveys to determine the efficacy of POWER and conducted post hoc analyses on post-campaign data to determine if exposure to POWER was related to higher levels of positive condom attitudes and norms and condom use.
RESULTS: We found no differences between neighborhoods with and without the POWER campaign with regard to our primary outcomes. To diagnose reasons for this null effect, we examined outcomes post hoc examining the influence of POWER exposure. Post hoc analyses show some evidence that exposure to POWER was associated with condom use. In the context of the nested trial, this raises concerns that post test only evaluations are limited.
CONCLUSIONS: Establishing the efficacy of a social marketing campaign is challenging. This group randomized trial showed a null effect. Social marketing campaigns may need to have more media channels and saturation before they can show behavioral effects. Using a nested design with randomization at the community level and probability sampling introduces rigor not commonly seen in evaluations of social marketing campaigns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18565440     DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  9 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for encouraging sexual behaviours intended to prevent cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan P Shepherd; Geoff K Frampton; Petra Harris
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-04-13

Review 2.  Community Education for Family Planning in the U.S.: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marion W Carter; Michelle L Tregear; Susan B Moskosky
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Using community-based participatory mixed methods research to understand preconception health in African American communities of Arizona.

Authors:  Khaleel S Hussaini; Eric Hamm; Toni Means
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-12

4.  Use of the "NYC Condom" among people who use drugs.

Authors:  Don C Des Jarlais; Courtney McKnight; Kamyar Arasteh; Jonathan Feelemyer; David Perlman; Holly Hagan; Hannah L F Cooper
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  Community Education and Engagement in Family Planning: Updated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anjana E Sharma; Brittni N Frederiksen; Nikita M Malcolm; Julia M Rollison; Marion W Carter
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Population attributable risk for chlamydia infection in a cohort of young international travellers (backpackers) and residents in Australia.

Authors:  Handan Wand; Rebecca Guy; Basil Donovan; Anna McNulty
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Effectiveness of community-based condom distribution interventions to prevent HIV in the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohsen Malekinejad; Andrea Parriott; Janet C Blodgett; Hacsi Horvath; Ram K Shrestha; Angela B Hutchinson; Paul Volberding; James G Kahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  An evaluation of the Be Your Own Baby public awareness campaign.

Authors:  Daniel Marthey; Hira Rashid; Liyang Xie; Michel Boudreaux
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.734

Review 9.  Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Literature on Global Condom Promotion Programs.

Authors:  William D Evans; Alec Ulasevich; Megan Hatheway; Bidia Deperthes
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.